Nerdrotic doesn't like it, which makes me want to see it even more.
I have never watched a YouTube movie review in my life. It’s baffling to me that people use any of them to determine what they see. More so that they are famous themselves and part of the discussion. From the reactions I read on this stuff, any movie, the opinions are shaped by getting attention.
Someone has a YouTube video to make and countless followers. Filling a review video is what they are thinking about the whole time watching anything. They have a mental checklist of whether it meets their demands. Obviously this is not limited to videos. But written ones too. Please me or I am angry. Particularly with existing franchises.
So now it's Riddler as in "riddle with bullets?"
That kind of close-mindedness is a weird thing to flaunt. Christy Lemire, for one, has a long career as a professional film critic for the Associated Press. You're obviously entitled to say that your opinions are the only person's opinions that matter to you, but I assure you, your opinions are not so special that anyone else here should care what you think for the single reason you don't post reviews to YouTube.
They should do exit interviews.
"So what made you decide to see this?"
"Nerdrotic."
"People keep saying that!"
To really engage on that level, you really have to go see the movie. So you're having an educated conversation.
A critic can bring up information and viewpoints in their review that have value even to those who will never see the movie. I am not sure if I will see the current Supergirl movie, but I am still interested in what it is attempting to do and say, and I am curious if it has any elements that distinguish it from other entries in the superhero genre.
Similar threads
