• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

DC Cinematic Universe ( The James Gunn era)

Maybe that budget includes hidden figures that may not go directly to production, but rather things like promotion?

Usually, when media reports on a film's budget, they're likely talking about the production budget alone, not the marketing budget. That said, if this movie's costing $364 million, one can only imagine what the marketing budget will be for the film that's supposed to reboot a film universe. Its an understatement to say there's much riding on this movie.
 
1338-a113bddb-66a2-4c4a-8e56-fd3ac475b804.png
 
More from Gunn:
When I finished the first draft of the script, I called the film Superman: Legacy. By the time I locked the final draft, it was clear the title was SUPERMAN. Making our way to you July 2025. Happy Birthday, Clark! UpUpAndAway
https://www.threads.net/@jamesgunn

Kinda cool that the official title is simply Superman, which was also the actual onscreen title of Donner's classic -- only marketing material and such dubbed it Superman: The Movie.

From what little we can see of the costume, I like it fine -- I'd personally prefer a more traditional "S," but the yellow is nice. I suppose the modern basketball texturing was inevitable, since apparently the universe would collapse and swallow itself if Superman or any other superhero ever wore smooth fabric in live-action again (at least for the major hero suit -- they went smooth for Hoechlin's Fleischer suit on S&L, and it looked much better than the heavily-textured ones they've given him in the show's present-day).

But as I've said many times, while I'll certainly have opinions on costuming and such, ultimately that kind of thing matters much, much less to me than character, performance, story, theme, tone, romance, humor ... the things that, to me, make a film live and breathe and sing. And I really can't wait to see what Gunn brings to the screen for my favorite characters in Superman '25. :techman:
 
I'm curious how they're going to differentiate it from the first Donner/Reeve movie, will be Superman '78 and Superman '24?
 
Maybe that budget includes hidden figures that may not go directly to production, but rather things like promotion?
Or past production costs for Superman films that never made it out of 'development hell'. :shrug:

(Still it's surprising IF that's the production budget as they seem to be setting themselves up to fail out of the gate as it's a HUGE Box Office hurdle to clear. Again looks like someone at WB just thinks "If it's Superman, EVERYONE will come/pay to see it in a theatre."
 
Last edited:
Kinda cool that the official title is simply Superman, which was also the actual onscreen title of Donner's classic -- only marketing material and such dubbed it Superman: The Movie.

Whereas I find it annoying when two films have the same title. I like titles that are individual and relevant to the specific story.

As far as onscreen titles go, I've always found it interesting that neither the 1988 Ruby-Spears Superman animated series nor Bruce Timm's Superman: TAS actually showed the title "Superman" in its main title sequence, just using the Superman logo (although the former did use the classic voiceover narration and thus had the name spoken aloud several times). For that matter, Batman: TAS also had a main title sequence without written text, and the title card of Batman Forever, IIRC, just had "Forever" over the Batman logo. It's as if the Superman and Batman logos were being used as pictographs for the names themselves.
 
Comics artist Clay Mann (THE definitive modern Lois Lane artist, IMO) posted this tonight on his Twitter:

GHjBQowW0AEigkw


It's a reworking of this older piece, replacing the original S-shield with Gunn's newly revealed version (as well as changing the TV image, obviously):

FhDczQAWIAAJstf
 
Whereas I find it annoying when two films have the same title. I like titles that are individual and relevant to the specific story.
It's not as if the 1978 film staked out anything intrinsically unique to it with its title, however appropriate it was to the epic classic; therefore a following artist should not feel that the title's off limits. Simply call the first one Superman (1978), problem solved.
 
Here's a really delightful video Rachel Brosnahan just posted:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Apparently, she captioned the original TikTok version of the clip, "A supervillain, a journalist and an alien walk into a bar .…" :)

(Thanks to M'Sharak for teaching me how to embed YouTube "Shorts" a while back.)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top