Not seeing this "news" being reported anywhere...
I felt that way while watching the film.There were moments in the film he came off as so disinterested and disengaged
There were moments in the film he came off as so disinterested and disengaged that I had doubts he had spent any considerable time studying the script. Sometimes I wondered if he even knew what film he was in.
It was an extremely poor performance, almost to the point of being unprofessional, especially given what a great actor he otherwise is. Frankly, I think his whole tenure as Bond has been hugely underwhelming and overrated. I'd put him at the bottom just above Lazenby. But a potato sack covered in duck feathers and chocolate would have been better than Lazenby.
That's very harsh on Lazenby who wasn't an experienced actor and who in no way disgraced himself in one of the better bond movies.There were moments in the film he came off as so disinterested and disengaged that I had doubts he had spent any considerable time studying the script. Sometimes I wondered if he even knew what film he was in.
It was an extremely poor performance, almost to the point of being unprofessional, especially given what a great actor he otherwise is. Frankly, I think his whole tenure as Bond has been hugely underwhelming and overrated. I'd put him at the bottom just above Lazenby. But a potato sack covered in duck feathers and chocolate would have been better than Lazenby.
The Craig films that I remember are Casino Royale because I was into Texas Holdem at the time, and Skyfall because the old Aston Martin makes an appearance.The only one I remember of the four so far is Skyfall and that's because of Judy Dench.
It actually took me a while to catch onto that. I remember after the first time I saw Casino Royale one of my first complaints was "why does he keep throwing his phones away, only to get a new one when he needs to do something different? Why doesn't he just have one phone to do everything?" I think it took nearly a year before someone pointed out to me he isn't just throwing phones away, he's throwing anything/everything away after it's no longer any use to him.Bond doesn't care, with a few exceptions, about anyone or anything, once they've served their purpose they're disposable. It's one of the things he's done from the start.
It actually took me a while to catch onto that. I remember after the first time I saw Casino Royale one of my first complaints was "why does he keep throwing his phones away, only to get a new one when he needs to do something different? Why doesn't he just have one phone to do everything?" I think it took nearly a year before someone pointed out to me he isn't just throwing phones away, he's throwing anything/everything away after it's no longer any use to him.
Because of this misunderstanding it always amused me when one of the complaints I saw many have about the Jeffrey Deaver modern Bond novel was that Bond's smart phone was used way too much.
I don't even remember what Spectre is about. I only saw it once, but that's really freaking unusual for me. I hated each of the post-GoldenEye Brosnan Bonds, I saw each of them only once, but I remember what they were about. I'd rather just watch A View to a Kill again than revisit those, but I guess I need to give Spectre another whirl.
And Spectre doesn't?Neither film is written well, but at least Skyfall had some beautiful imagery/cinematography.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.