Three's Venusian Karate v Miss Piggy's karate chops.
Three's Venusian Karate v Miss Piggy's karate chops.
Same plot, same villain, same name Bond girl. Obviously they updated NSNA to the 1980s & acknowledged Connery's age and there are some differences in the action scenes etc (Cubby Broccoli apparently was at one stage insisting that it be a shot-for-shot remake) but it's very recognisable as the same story.
Actually Broccoli had nothing to do with NSNA, it was made by someone who had disputed the rights to Thunderball and the legal quagmire was the reason SPECTRE were eased out of the Bond Universe until the case was settled (even Blofeld's last appearance in For Your Eyes Only he wasn't mentioned by name). The James Bond RPG produced in 1983 also had to replace SPECTRE with TAROT and Skorpios due to this legal dispute - I have wondered if The Simpsons Bondish villain of Scorpio may have been a homage to the game.
^
Yes, I know that. But Broccoli was on the other side of the legal dispute. So he tried to argue that Kevin McCrory, producer of NSNA, should only be entitled to remake Thunderball, not to be able to do a 007 movie that in any way deviated from the sole film in which McClory was involved. Obviously this argument failed.
Ah right sorry I interpreted from what you said that you meant Cubby was involved directly. Was a little like the odd legal stuff that drifted around during the Battlestar Galactica reboot, where Larson was actively working on a movie but for some reason he would have been allowed to use the Battlestar Pegasus but not the Galactica.
Not strictly true - we could have used them if we were willing to give 60% of the fee to Terry Nation. So more a "not motivated to" than "not allowed to"...Sounds a bit like how the Virgin Dr Who novels weren't allowed to feature Daleks
Not strictly true - we could have used them if we were willing to give 60% of the fee to Terry Nation. So more a "not motivated to" than "not allowed to"...
Wow smart move there by the Nation estate. Take 60% of a writer's royalty and have no-one write a Dalek oriented NA or set a much lower royalty rate and get the Daleks in a few book.
Though what counted as featured? Were there any royalties to be paid for their mention (such as Ace talking about her Dalek encounters in Lucifer Rising) or is it when they are directly involved in the story line?
Not strictly true - we could have used them if we were willing to give 60% of the fee to Terry Nation. So more a "not motivated to" than "not allowed to"...
I still think a Doctor Who Red Dwarf would be smashing and if written half seriou, and half funny could very well work given the Dwarfers are 3 million years ahead of the 24th century. .even a children in need special, if done well would be awesome. The old Doc lands on the dwarf and they have to battle some Cybermen and Simulants invading the ship. Lots of corridors and running.
So basically the Terry Nation estate cutting off it's nose to spite it's face
Did the Daleks not appear much in the BBC books for similar reasons?
Pretty much, except for John Peel being a mate of the Nation Estate. Whether he got a better deal or was more willing, I couldn't say.
I think the ET thing was mainly George's reply to the multiple Star Wars references in E.T-the action figures and the Yoda costume (With John Williams even putting part of the Yoda theme in there!).
I hold now and forever that Guinan is a Timelord. Why couldn't we see her and Seven together?
A Stargate SG-1 verse crossover is possible - the TARDIS intersects a wormhole that is crossing dimensional boundaries (as per the eps where SG-1 encounters multiversal duplicates of the team) and can't leave immediately due to the same power issues as in the CybusMen dimension... naturally the Doctor immediately grasps concepts like Stargates, transport rings and all the other "weird" stuff SG-1 deals with and is in danger of showing up Carter and Jackson (especially Jackson, since the TARDIS translates things)
Because Seven was trapped in the Delta Quadrant with the rest of the Voyager crew.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.