Wow you're not kidding. I particularly like the Starbase shots.
Here's another great one courtesy of TrekMovie.
The new FX shots were very nice.
One syndication cut that was particularly jarring was when the prosecution tried to interrupt the listing of Kirk's medals. The lines from Cogley were cut. It showed the prosecutor saying she concedes Kirk inestimable record followed by the judge asking the computer to continue, which messed up that scene (as well as removing one of the best moments of the episode). This part used to be in the previous syndication versions, but I guess it had to be sacrificed for the ever increasing commercial time. I wish they had picked some other scene to cut.
I hope I don't seem completely ignorant by asking this, but do the DVD's include the full episodes (which, I assume, would include mostly stuff without too many additional effects).
The other problem with this image is that the gas giant has moved. The moon that this starbase is on should probably be tidelocked.Wow you're not kidding. I particularly like the Starbase shots.
Here's another great one courtesy of TrekMovie.
I had a problem with this image. The circular buildings in the foreground appear to be 1-story thick at the rim. That would made the tall building on the right 15-20 stories tall. But they superimposed some folks walking inside the tall building, sized to make it look like an 8-story building. The scale of the starbase was thrown totally off. One of the few times I had to rewind to make sure what I was seeing. Probably wouldn't have bothered me, if it wasn't such an iconic image from Star Trek....
I don't really get this impression. Sure, the cylindrar building at the foreground should be one story tall - that is, the story that has the square windows, plus a set of narrow skylights close to the domed ceiling. The other mushroom things seem to be shaped so much unlike a useful house that they probably don't have a story structure or habitable volume or anything like that, and are only about three stories tall overall.I had a problem with this image. The circular buildings in the foreground appear to be 1-story thick at the rim. That would made the tall building on the right 15-20 stories tall.
Unless there's a tall mountain range to the left, of course.Which means it shouldn't yet have set below the horizon, so the scene should still be daylit.
While most of the big moons of Jupiter and Saturn are tidally locked to their gas giants, the "gas giant" here is anything but - you can see distinct craters on the surface of that bright thing on the sky! It's a rock, and a very small one at that, not a gas giant at all. The rock on which the starbase sits is probably bigger than that, and possibly is the centerpiece in the ballet that features at least three-four orbiting rocks: the one with the rings, and the two-three even smaller (or at least more distant) ones that share the sky with it in the second shot.The other problem with this image is that the gas giant has moved. The moon that this starbase is on should probably be tidelocked.
I don't really get this impression. Sure, the cylindrar building at the foreground should be one story tall - that is, the story that has the square windows, plus a set of narrow skylights close to the domed ceiling. The other mushroom things seem to be shaped so much unlike a useful house that they probably don't have a story structure or habitable volume or anything like that, and are only about three stories tall overall.
Unless there's a tall mountain range to the left, of course.Which means it shouldn't yet have set below the horizon, so the scene should still be daylit.
No, seriously, forks. The terrain is shown to be quite mountaneous. And the earlier establishing shot, of the avenue where a couple of people walk, also shows the sun well above the horizon yet the city in darkness.
Whether the small rock could plausibly have a well-defined set of rings is another question. There's no physical law against the existence of rings even around the tiniest objects, even though such phenomena are probably even more short-lived around small planets than they are around large ones. But wouldn't the rings be massively disrupted by the great proximity of the starbase planet?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.