Is that supposed to be the port where they jettisoned the pod in the image with the woman in the window above it?
Is that supposed to be the port where they jettisoned the pod in the image with the woman in the window above it?
As would Renoir.Raphael would fit the motif.
Also, it is clearly a re-use of the previous high-in-the-sky, night moon image, photoshopped into the scene. Some of the details match almost perfectly. I hadn't actually noticed the shadow and light direction before, but now that it has been pointed out, it does stand out a bit.
Yes. In a later shot, you see what might be spacesuited workers moving a replacement pod into place
Which has me wondering what that part of the ship looks like normally.
In William Shatner's "Star Trek Memories" book he talks to one of the effects guys, Eddie Milkis I think, and the interviewee says that they used the smaller model if they wanted "a pod to blow out".
Besides, TOS-era Constitution class ships had only torpedo tubes and phaser banks in the underside of the saucer section didn't they? No apertures big enough for anything much bigger than a photon torpedo.
Yes. In a later shot, you see what might be spacesuited workers moving a replacement pod into place
An excellent place for the pod, really, allowing Finney to slip into the maze of Engineering facilities unnoticed (as we well know that there never is anybody anywhere near the shuttlebay to stop unauthorized movement!).
Which has me wondering what that part of the ship looks like normally.
There is no detail observable between the aftermost of the two round portholes and the "1837" marker there in the original model. OTOH, the R-team essentially seems to have turned the after of those two portholes into the ion pod, as we only see one lit hole there. I'm not sure they didn't jiggle the positioning of the 'hole, too.
I'm actually a bit disappointed they didn't turn both of those portholes into ion pods. As these things are by definition an expendable commodity, it would make sense for the ship to have several. (And perhaps more than two; if they had two on the port side as well, it would make more sense that the dialogue doesn't specify e.g. "starboard ion pod"; it's just one of the numerous possibilities that are clustered close to each other, no need to identify it more accurately.)
Timo Saloniemi
The detail they used is not a porthole. In real life it is a switch, used to turn the lighting on the 11 foot model on and off. IIRC it is a "button switch" -- push in -- lights on, and push again -- lights off.
The detail they used is not a porthole. In real life it is a switch, used to turn the lighting on the 11 foot model on and off. IIRC it is a "button switch" -- push in -- lights on, and push again -- lights off.
I would really appreciate it if someone could provide a photo of the area in question. Ideally both one of the original miniature and one of the TOS-R digital version in normal (non-"Court-martial") configuration.
Okay: Why would having someone in the pod, as it's being discussed, endanger the ship? A pod, attached in the position of the lighting switch or the nub on the bottom of the primary hull is always exposed to the local environment, ion storm or no, and doesn't affect the ship's safety. As depicted here, the ion pod's another room on the ship. Finney being in or out of it makes no matter.
I've sometimes imagined the pod was more like a diving bell, extended away from the ship so its readings were not distorted by its systems. If that were the case, it might be a problem--open hatches, a cable or arm connecting the pod which might conduct current back to the ship's systems (think the shuttle space tether experiments), etc. It's possible that might have been the arrangement the TOS-R team envisioned, but if it were, I doubt we'd see the scorch marks from where the explosive bolts holding the pod to the side of the ship detonated.
Admittedly, that's not the best way to go, but neither is the pod. A probe, as discussed above, remote and independent of the Enterprise, makes the most sense, but it doesn't set up the same potential for the story as does sending Finney up to the crow's nest in a typhoon to watch for rocks. The business with the pod's a contrivance, but one I'm willing to forgive as I do enjoy this episode.
Here's that area of the stern, cropped from a Galileo Seven screen cap, remastered before Court Martial. You'll notice no ion pod, no switch, no nothing.
Actually, its absence is in fine Star Trek tradition, along with Tommorrow Is Yesterday's transporter room food replicators and Space Seed's engineering levers, one of which became a Khan basher. File it under Props Used Once And Then Forgotten About.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.