You release an "official prequel to STXI", you better make sure that prequel can actually be a prequel and thus be in continuity with the movie. If it isn't that, what's the point?
What in the movie contradicts the comic? Because if there is anything, it's something minor that I haven't noticed, and could easily be ironed out if made into a mini-series or whatever.
Does the film really say there's no former friendship between Spock and Nero?
You release an "official prequel to STXI", you better make sure that prequel can actually be a prequel and thus be in continuity with the movie. If it isn't that, what's the point?
DC Comics' "The Origin of Saavik" two-parter led directly into their ST III comic adaptation. Through the course of the story, they even gradually tilted Saavik's eyebrows, from Alley brows to Curtis brows! The comics weren't stamped with "official", but then all licensed ST tie-ins are approved by the copyright owner, and that's as official as you can get. Unofficial tie-ins are illegal fanfic.
DC Comics also did some issues that set up ST IV: showing Janice Rand working for Admiral Cartwight at Starfleet HQ, Spock's restored memory revert to a blank slate, and Styles successding in getting Excelsior back from Kirk. These comics weren't stamped with "official", but they certainly set up an acceptable status quo, restoring events for ST IV.
In Marvel/Paramount Comics' and Pocket Books' "Star Trek vs X-Men" materials, the Enterprise-E didn't time travel successfully at the end of "First Contact", and had two encounters with the X-Men first!
The official novelization of "Nemesis" put Wesley Crusher onto USS Titan, developing a dropped scene from the movie. The nine-part "A Time..." novel series was able to ignore thar scene, because it wasn't canonical and didn't suit their plans for the trainee Traveler.
The comic was written after the film was shot, so that likely accounts for such a discrepancy.
The thing about this is, the companion comics/books didn't make up so much of the plot and backstory in the way Countdown does.You release an "official prequel to STXI", you better make sure that prequel can actually be a prequel and thus be in continuity with the movie. If it isn't that, what's the point?
DC Comics' "The Origin of Saavik" two-parter led directly into their ST III comic adaptation. Through the course of the story, they even gradually tilted Saavik's eyebrows, from Alley brows to Curtis brows! The comics weren't stamped with "official", but then all licensed ST tie-ins are approved by the copyright owner, and that's as official as you can get. Unofficial tie-ins are illegal fanfic.
DC Comics also did some issues that set up ST IV: showing Janice Rand working for Admiral Cartwight at Starfleet HQ, Spock's restored memory revert to a blank slate, and Styles successding in getting Excelsior back from Kirk. These comics weren't stamped with "official", but they certainly set up an acceptable status quo, restoring events for ST IV.
In Marvel/Paramount Comics' and Pocket Books' "Star Trek vs X-Men" materials, the Enterprise-E didn't time travel successfully at the end of "First Contact", and had two encounters with the X-Men first!
The official novelization of "Nemesis" put Wesley Crusher onto USS Titan, developing a dropped scene from the movie. The nine-part "A Time..." novel series was able to ignore thar scene, because it wasn't canonical and didn't suit their plans for the trainee Traveler.
As I've noted already, the comparison of the Federation to the European Union doesn't really work. The United Federation of Planets is just that -- a federation, a sovereign state comprised of sub-polities with whom the state shares power. The European Union, on the other hand, is an especially strong alliance of sovereign states that has been delegated some of the functions of a sovereign state -- but which is not itself a sovereign state, as evidenced by the lack of a unified foreign policy (e.g., the United Kingdom and Kingdom of Spain participating in the Iraq War while the French Republic and Federal Republic of Germany oppose the war) and lack of international recognition of the EU as a sovereign state.
The Federation, on the other hand, possesses all of the traits of a sovereign state. It has the right to make binding law throughout its territory (TNG: "Force of Nature"). It raises and maintains its own military in the Federation Starfleet. It can unilaterally declare martial law over the territory of one of its member states (DS9: "Homefront"/"Paradise Lost"). It can conduct foreign policy without getting its member states' permissions (Star Trek VI). It exchanges ambassadors with other sovereign states. It declares war and wages peace. Etc.
In TNG, DS9 and beyond. (Really at the latest from STVI and beyond.)
Before that though, the Federation is not yet a state. "Journey To Babel" tells us very much a UN-like organization. For one thing, the Federation is unable to decide for the Tellarites whether or not they can exploit Coridan, not even once they've been admitted into the Federation. As Sarek says, if Coridan has entered the Federation, what can be done is that Starfleet can protect Coridan from among others the Tellarites. Starfleet protecting one Federation member world from another Federation member world.
As I've noted already, the comparison of the Federation to the European Union doesn't really work. The United Federation of Planets is just that -- a federation, a sovereign state comprised of sub-polities with whom the state shares power. The European Union, on the other hand, is an especially strong alliance of sovereign states that has been delegated some of the functions of a sovereign state -- but which is not itself a sovereign state, as evidenced by the lack of a unified foreign policy (e.g., the United Kingdom and Kingdom of Spain participating in the Iraq War while the French Republic and Federal Republic of Germany oppose the war) and lack of international recognition of the EU as a sovereign state.
The Federation, on the other hand, possesses all of the traits of a sovereign state. It has the right to make binding law throughout its territory (TNG: "Force of Nature"). It raises and maintains its own military in the Federation Starfleet. It can unilaterally declare martial law over the territory of one of its member states (DS9: "Homefront"/"Paradise Lost"). It can conduct foreign policy without getting its member states' permissions (Star Trek VI). It exchanges ambassadors with other sovereign states. It declares war and wages peace. Etc.
In TNG, DS9 and beyond. (Really at the latest from STVI and beyond.)
Actually, it comes as early as "Errand of Mercy," wherein Kirk says that the Federation Council has declared war upon the Klingon Empire -- something a mere intergovernmental organization cannot do.
I don't think we can take anything from "Journey to Babel" as an indicator of what things are usually like. "Journey to Babel" makes it pretty clear that the Federation is on the brink of civil war over the issue of admitting Coridan as a Member world; as such, the situation doesn't really give us any useful information about the normal legalities of how the Federation functions. Indeed, one of the things that seems to fuel the disagreement is that apparently Tellar has claimed Coridan as part of their internal territory.Before that though, the Federation is not yet a state. "Journey To Babel" tells us very much a UN-like organization. For one thing, the Federation is unable to decide for the Tellarites whether or not they can exploit Coridan, not even once they've been admitted into the Federation. As Sarek says, if Coridan has entered the Federation, what can be done is that Starfleet can protect Coridan from among others the Tellarites. Starfleet protecting one Federation member world from another Federation member world.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.