Let me start off by saying that I haven't read any of the preceding posts so if these issues have been touched upon, please forgive me.
To answer the thread title's question: no, there is noway that TATV could have been a good episode for a number of reasons.
1.) It's not an ENT episode, it's a TNG episode
2.) Even as a TNG episode it's awful and there was absolutely no attempt to use make-up to make Sirtas and Frakes look like they did a decade earlier. Yes, there is only so much you can do but it has been done realtively successfully on other shows and if they couldn't do it, they shouldn't have subjected us to that nonsense with those characters (Frakes especially) because it was totaly unbelievable. If they were so set on doing a TNG story, they should have used Stewart, Dorn or Wheaton as they don't look like they've aged at all in the last decade and you can hide a lot more under Kligon makeup anyway.
3.) They killed Trip off for Fuck's sake!!! WTF were they thinking?!
4.) The episode is a downer all the way around.
5.) Because of the fact that they spent 75% of the episode on the Enterprise-D, they didn't flesh out the founding of the Federation at all. It should have been a two hour episode.
6.) Even if they had made the damned thing sans the TNG storyline it still should have been a 2 hour ep.
In closing TATV wasn't just a disservice to Trek fans or ENT fans it was a disservice to anyone who actually enjoys a good story.
I used to be a huge critic of ENT but in the last few months I watched the entire series the whole way through and I actually like it a lot more than I did and despite what most people think, I think Season 3 was great (Season 4 is a given).
That being said, TATV is still a POS despite me giving ENT a second chance.
-Shawn
