• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Chris Nolan is prepping Batman 3 and will mentor a new Superman film

Re: Chris Nolan is prepping Batman 3 and will mentor a new Superman fi

Sure, Gene Hackman's fun to watch, but the character is too lame to be Lex Luthor.

I agree with you whole-heartedly about the stupidity of S:TM's Luthor. The one thing they did right was to cast Hackman, who could effortlessly convey menace even in the midst of camp. As stupid as it all is, Hackman's easy humor as he explains his plan, the way he responds to Ms. Tessmacher's plea about her mother (just checking his watch and shaking his head) - is chilling, just for a moment, but chilling nonetheless. But yes, the set up for Luthor and his plan is inane in the extreme.


Granted. One thing I will give the Donner films is that they told big stories (aside from the minuscule size and competence of Luthor's excuse for a criminal organization). For all the faults of Superman II, its Metropolis battle between Superman and Zod's trio is one of the most effective cinematic translations of comic-book action ever made (if you ignore the comedy beats Richard Lester stuck into it). And I can't get over the stupidity of Clark and Lois walking back to civilization from the middle of the Arctic, and the whole super-amnesia-kiss thing was a totally inane copout, but I'll grant that they did choose to tell a big story about Superman/Clark and Lois. I'd just like to see a big story told in a way that actually makes a modicum of sense.

I agree here as well. In fact, one the worst mistakes of this film is that you have this heart-rending tale of a god giving up his powers to be with a mortal woman at the exact instant that three destructive gods arrive to conquer the world - is that right at a key moment, Lois suddenly acts like a whiny, petulant ass, crying that she wants the man with powers. I've always hated the truck stop scene from start to finish. The world's been conquered by aliens and these people are bantering over a diner counter top? WTF? There was such potential for an amazing scene there, and it's pretty much blown. (And the coda to it makes Superman seem like a petulant ass himself.)

But my point is that the basic story being told here is a compelling myth in our culture - the conflict for a warrior between love and duty.


Granted, Lois-Clark chemistry is important. Too bad I really disliked Margot Kidder.

I can't imagine. Particularly in S:TM she is the sheer embodiment of Lois Lane. And no Supes/ Lois team has ever had the crackling timing of Reeve and Kidder.


Which is why Lois & Clark, despite being so cheesy you couldn't watch it without crackers, manages to have some real charm - the love story works.

Yeah, the chemistry there was pretty good.

They're fun enough, sure, but again, the point is the story evolves around Clark as a man with amazing powers - who is in love with a driven, adventurous woman who is his equal, if not in physical strength, in mental and emotional strength. The reason Superman's rogue gallery is largely forgettable is because his foil has always been Lois. It's possible to tell a decent short tale in the comics without her, but for any big Superman story (as a movie must be) the love story has to be paramount because it is fundamental to Superman's identity. It's where the meat of the character's drama is.
 
Re: Chris Nolan is prepping Batman 3 and will mentor a new Superman fi

Why should Krypton be functional?

Because people live and work there. What should a living or working environment be but functional? Keeping in mind that the comfort and psychological well-being of its occupants is part of its function. That barren, sharp-edged, colorless crystal environment in the movie strikes me as a horrible place to try to live or work, even aside from the complete lack of any practical accoutrements or any sign of life forms other than the actors. True, they deliberately wanted it to be cold and barren for some strange reason, and they succeeded to the point that the environment is completely repellent to me, but they also rendered it completely devoid of anything remotely credible as a living or working environment. (Hell, where do they even get their oxygen if there are no plants, no soil for them to grow in? If the whole planet is just one big crystal, how the hell does anyone live there?) It's a one-note caricature of an alien environment, far more so than the oft-scorned single-ecology planets in Star Wars.

Just what I'be been thinking about, and saying for years! Thanks for finally saying it, Christopher!

Also, Krypton should have been like something out of Star Trek (maybe even using the same types of designs and designers from TOS!) Maybe the new movie can hire Mike and Denise Okuda And Andrew Probert to do the designs for Krypton if it's mentioned, or maybe they can get the designers from Superman: The Animated Series! Either way, this looks good.
 
Re: Chris Nolan is prepping Batman 3 and will mentor a new Superman fi

Eh, I dunno about McTeague at the helm. While V for Vendetta wad good, Ninja Assasin was pretty bad. Under the tutelage of Nolan it might work out but ehh we'll see
 
Re: Chris Nolan is prepping Batman 3 and will mentor a new Superman fi

In a vacuum, yes. But I was responding to the idea of using the Donner film as a model for how a new Superman film should be approached. Whatever passed for "verisimilitude" in the context of the 1970s is no longer anywhere close to believable today.

Oh... well that makes sense.



Because people live and work there. What should a living or working environment be but functional? Keeping in mind that the comfort and psychological well-being of its occupants is part of its function. That barren, sharp-edged, colorless crystal environment in the movie strikes me as a horrible place to try to live or work, even aside from the complete lack of any practical accoutrements or any sign of life forms other than the actors. True, they deliberately wanted it to be cold and barren for some strange reason, and they succeeded to the point that the environment is completely repellent to me, but they also rendered it completely devoid of anything remotely credible as a living or working environment. (Hell, where do they even get their oxygen if there are no plants, no soil for them to grow in? If the whole planet is just one big crystal, how the hell does anyone live there?) It's a one-note caricature of an alien environment, far more so than the oft-scorned single-ecology planets in Star Wars.

I see where you're coming from, and in certain instances I prefer that myself. But I think this is an objective argument. I agree that the Krypton depicted wasn't functional, but on a purely visual level it stimulated me greatly, I had never seen anything quite like it at the time, and I still think that visually even Superman Returns and Smallville (lol!) fail to capture the beauty of Krypton as it was presented in Superman '78.

It didn't make sense, but for me it didn't have to. It was amazingly designed and beautifully shot apart from the scenes that were cut, which were clunky in terms of design and aesthetic by comparison.

I get the fact that you wanted a more functional approach, and that makes sense completely, I just don't feel it mattered much personally.
 
Re: Chris Nolan is prepping Batman 3 and will mentor a new Superman fi

Krypton as depicted in Superman the Movie has always fascinated me since I first saw it as a little kid in my grandmother's house. I still love this aspect of Krypton...that Kryptonians are so advanced that they use crystals to grow their infrastructure and technology. I'll agree that it wasn't functional. I think though it wasn't meant to be more of a visual feast. I don't think that anyone had seen Krypton on screen before so I'm sure that Donner and his team wanted it to be spectacular. They probably weren't sure themselves what Krypton should look like and how it should function. Geoff Johns has done a great job in explaining what the crystal technology (called Sunstone during his run) does and interacts. Lex seems to understand how the crystals work as well in Superman II and Superman Returns.
 
Re: Chris Nolan is prepping Batman 3 and will mentor a new Superman fi

I wonder why they don't embrace the sci-fi action aliens aspect of Superman in the films? It's not "out of character" the way magical stories in Spider-Man or bright sci-fi or campy stories in Batman are.

Seriously, I would go all out with a Darkseid and the armies of Apokalips attack. For that matter, why does Superman's introduction to the world always have to be catching a helicopter or plane? Why can't it be stopping a REAL threat?
 
Re: Chris Nolan is prepping Batman 3 and will mentor a new Superman fi

I agree, screw realism! (more or less) Screw earth based villains! Bring on some real foes!
 
Re: Chris Nolan is prepping Batman 3 and will mentor a new Superman fi

I hope they put a lot of sci-fi elements in the Superman reboot, too, especially in terms of the villains. The fact that Warners has signed off on a fully-fledged sci-fi adaptation of Green Lantern hopefully signals a willingness to go in that direction with other superhero films, perhaps including Superman.
 
Re: Chris Nolan is prepping Batman 3 and will mentor a new Superman fi

I agree, screw realism! (more or less) Screw earth based villains! Bring on some real foes!

Yeah, I'd love to see how much a Superman vs. Darkseid movie would cost.
 
Re: Chris Nolan is prepping Batman 3 and will mentor a new Superman fi

What I disagree with is the assumption that a science-fictional approach is incompatible with a realistic approach. The "science" part of the phrase "science fiction" is supposed to mean something. And even fantasy is best handled in a naturalistic, plausible manner to facilitate suspension of disbelief.
 
Re: Chris Nolan is prepping Batman 3 and will mentor a new Superman fi

I agree, screw realism! (more or less) Screw earth based villains! Bring on some real foes!

Yeah, I'd love to see how much a Superman vs. Darkseid movie would cost.

Thinking maybe Avatar budget numbers? With 170 million for Superman Returns, could be a little higher, although maybe they can hire Neil Blomkamp to helm. He managed to keep the costs pretty low on District 9 and the FX on that was pretty good in my opinion, haha

A property like Superman might be too much for him
 
Re: Chris Nolan is prepping Batman 3 and will mentor a new Superman fi

Neil Blomkamp is an inspired choice for Superman. Superman Returns cost around $185 million discounting marketing and other figures (including those from previous failed Superman productions) but apparently the final production budget skyrocketed a bit towards the end of post-production and landed somewhere in the $200 million range.
 
Re: Chris Nolan is prepping Batman 3 and will mentor a new Superman fi

He would be a great choice for "Superman" but I still want to see him make a "Halo" movie if there's a chance.
 
Re: Chris Nolan is prepping Batman 3 and will mentor a new Superman fi

They're fun enough, sure, but again, the point is the story evolves around Clark as a man with amazing powers - who is in love with a driven, adventurous woman who is his equal, if not in physical strength, in mental and emotional strength. The reason Superman's rogue gallery is largely forgettable is because his foil has always been Lois. It's possible to tell a decent short tale in the comics without her, but for any big Superman story (as a movie must be) the love story has to be paramount because it is fundamental to Superman's identity. It's where the meat of the character's drama is.

Lapis, I'm really enjoying your thoughts on this. I do have a question though (not just for you): what about the trend in (some) comics towards pairing Superman off with Wonder Woman if Lois is for some reason not in the picture? I guess I'm mostly thinking of Kingdom Come here, since I can't think of any other good examples off the top of my head...
 
Re: Chris Nolan is prepping Batman 3 and will mentor a new Superman fi

Lapis, I hope you don't mind, I saved that first great post of yours in my computer. I thought they were really spot on (though I enjoyed Superman II and Returns).
 
Re: Chris Nolan is prepping Batman 3 and will mentor a new Superman fi

I'd like to read both those films drafts eventually. Interesting thoughts about Lois and Clark Lapis which I agree with...also about earlier statements regarding Margot Kidder, I thought she was a fantastic Lois Lane and her dynamic with Christopher Reeve is great. I just don't like this constant need that Lois needs to fall in Superman without accepting Clark Kent. The comic book Lois Lane managed to fall in love with Superman and later realized she was in love with Clark Kent. This is one aspect of the Donner films and Superman Returns that I'm not a big fan of.
 
Re: Chris Nolan is prepping Batman 3 and will mentor a new Superman fi

I hope they put a lot of sci-fi elements in the Superman reboot, too, especially in terms of the villains. The fact that Warners has signed off on a fully-fledged sci-fi adaptation of Green Lantern hopefully signals a willingness to go in that direction with other superhero films, perhaps including Superman.

My thoughts exactly.. we've had 5 Superman movies now and in 3 or 4 of them the main villain was Luthor. It gets old especially with the lame villain plot so i believe they need to expand the scope.

Green Lantern might be the perfect point to widen Superman's world to include some of the more powerful and equal enemies like Darkseid and Brainiac who can really put on some hurt on Superman.

Additionally i'm not convinced by Nolan supervising Superman.. sure, he made some fantastic Batman movies but it remains to be seen if he "understands" Superman as well and isn't just doing dark Superman.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top