Also, Carmilla didn't go biting Laura's neck in the novella.
There are a lot of odd things in the novella. There are a number of interpretations that settle them by taking the Styrian as a metaphor for Ireland and that the story is about the fear of Anglo/Irish children turning from their British inheritance and assimilating into the Irish culture. Laura, English/Austrian and descended from the Karnsteins through her mother is tempted abandon her Anglo inheritance through her father for the ancestral Irish ruling class that she's descended from. Le Fanu had a lot of issues whichever way you cut it.Indeed, it was on the sternum, putting it politely.
Also, Carmilla fed on Laura as an infant, years before pulling the damsel in distress part of the plan when she was in her 20's. I don't think people would be up for that part of the story being kept either.
The whole collection of stories from 'In a Glass Darkly' play on memory and perception. Carmilla really might have been outside that door at the end, we don't know, only that Laura dies some time after finishing the manuscript. Natural causes, Carmilla come back, who knows, but it seems Le Fanu wanted it open to interpretation like the other stories often were.A lot of his books read strangely, I have a small publication of his ghost stories as well as Carmilla.
But given how short the story is, the semi-validity of Laura's memories and perception, it's open to a lot of interpretation as it is.
I've only watched season 1 so far, have they touched on her being able to turn into a panther yet?
The story has so many layers to it that you really have to question so very much. The framing prologue tells us Laura is dead to start with no cause of death given. She states that she's writing this almost a decade after the events so she is trying to recall how she felt long after the facts. Le Fanu really piles on that this story isn't one to take at face value but to question whether Laura is giving us the whole story or even can after all the time past. I wonder if Le Fanu really was trying to work past the standard omniscient narrator common to stories of the time with the 'In A Glass Darkly' tales by emphasizing how much the characters perceptions were deceived by emotion, drugs, misunderstanding and a dozen and one other ways that the facts in our heads are fictional constructs. Carmilla really plays that up with the layers of time and narrators between the events and the reader.If it is her, that's probably the most a Vampire has gone through and lived, well for the older stories.
They play this with infectious enthusiasm.Finally caught up with Season 3. Boy, Carmilla episodes are like blood-soaked potato chips. You can't watch just one.
To Hell, evidently.Curious to see where the plot is going . ...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.