• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Captain Marvel (2019)

I know it's pedantic, but I'm always a little hesitant to label adaptations of material that's already been adapted a "remake". Mostly because it always seems to infer an inherent inferiority, simply on the basis that someone else got there first. I guess "re-adaptation" would be a more accurate term?
The 57 million versions of the likes of 'A Christmas Carol' and 'Treasure Island' are probably the prime example of this, as opposed to the likes of 'Robocop' which was an original screenplay.

It's not always so clear cut though of course, especially when an adaptation becomes more famous than the source material (see: 'Wizard of Oz', 'The Thing', 'Conan The Barbarian' etc.) Plus of course there are shot-for-shot remakes of adaptations ('Psycho' leaps to mind) where the previous film version is the primary source, not the material it's all based on.

Yeah. The line between "remake" and "new adaptation" is a blurry one. As you note, a lot depends on the degree to which the movie version may have eclipsed the original text, as well as on how much the new film draws upon the previous film versions, as opposed to the original book. And, honestly, it often depends on how "literary" the source material is. A new version of LITTLE WOMEN is less likely to be labeled a "remake" than, say, a new version of PLANET OF THE APES or LOGAN'S RUN or JAWS, even though the latter also started out as novels.

Which, getting back to the post that started this side-discussion, raises the question: do we count the 1940 PHANTOM OF THE OPERA as a remake of classic 1925 movie--or as a new adaptation of Gaston Leroux's original novel? :)
 
Last edited:
For the people freaking out over the color of the Captain Marvel costume we've been seeing,
I'd like to point out that in the Infinity War post credits scene, we do see her logo on a red and blue background on the pager screen.
 
I can't imagine how hard it must be to try to decide what to use and what not to when it comes to a character with a history as complicated as Carol Danvers.
 
And I think we can all agree that if they don't cram in that whole "gives birth to her own brainwashing kidnapper and everyone else is cool just with it" subplot into the first act, then this movie will be justly decried as blatantly unfaithful to the source material and the legacy of Captain Marvel!!!

In all seriousness, if there's a "and then Rogue grabs her" post credits scene, I may just jump for joy. ;)
 
And I think we can all agree that if they don't cram in that whole "gives birth to her own brainwashing kidnapper and everyone else is cool just with it" subplot into the first act, then this movie will be justly decried as blatantly unfaithful to the source material and the legacy of Captain Marvel!!!

In all seriousness, if there's a "and then Rogue grabs her" post credits scene, I may just jump for joy. ;)
Uhg. Oh god. Avengers 200. Quite possibly one of the worst comics ever written. The really sad thing is that that isn't how the story was supposed to go. David Michelinie's original ending to Avengers 200 was deemed by editor in chief Jim Shooter to be too similar to the ending of a "What If?" story that Marvel had recently published and he instructed Michelinie to change it. And now, here we are 35-odd years later and nobody remembers the "What if?" story and the Avengers story lives in infamy.

ETA: Read the sad tale here...

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cb...rol-danvers-gave-birth-to-her-own-rapist/amp/
 
Last edited:
I think some people just like to bully people with different opinions until they go away. Guess what? It isn't going to happen.

Also, I don't like getting into arguments and I don't give a shit about "attention", but claiming I do is a great tactic to try to suppress my opinion, I suppose.



Well, its not called whining. Its a legitimate grievance. There is no such costume in any media. Her Captain Marvel costume was something she designed, it was never that color and it is not a kree uniform. if she wears it at all it completely breaks the character. If she wears it for more then five minutes, its the biggest costume fuck up in the entire MCU.

It's only legitimate if you really care. I know MANY MCU fans. None of them are comic fans. NONE OF THEM will care about the uniform consistency compared to the comics. This goes for the majority of MCU fans. People forget, that hardcore comic fans are a minority when it comes to MCU fans. And when I say hardcore comic fans, I mean HARDCORE. Not just casual readers.

The bigger part of MCU fans won't care about the colors of CM's outfit.
 
This is where one of us needs to insist that she absolutely has to wear her very first costume from MS. MARVEL #1, the one with the open belly window that she wore even before she donned the black leotard and red sash.

I'm sure Brie Larson would love that. :)
I wouldn't mind, but we're supposed to have come farther than that, or something....

I'm a hardcore Comics fan and nothing that I've seen bothers me in the slightest. Mainly because I know we'll be getting a Comics accurate suit by the end of the movie. Just like I didn't get upset when I saw shots of Steve Rogers "chorus girl" suit from the first Avengers.
But that was the comics-accurate version.
 
Oh, please. Comic book characters change costumes even more frequently than even Starfleet changes uniforms! That's part of what makes the character of Edna Mode in The Incredibles so hilarious -- the superhero world desperately needs the services of fashion designers.

Comic book artists looove fiddling with costumes, coming up with both signature designs and "what were they thinking?!" disasters. (I see that, in the new Cable movie, Shatterstar is still saddled with his Rob Liefeld "padded roll around his face" thing.) And writers often signal big changes first by new looks for the characters -- Spidey's black costume and Storm's punk look w/ the mohawk haircut come to mind. And as often as not, a character's look is a shorthand for understanding or identifying a character. In the original The Crisis on Infinite Earths, you were able to identify most characters in the enormous crowd scenes due to George Perez's incredible accuracy on the plethora of outfits!
 
The tan and brown was his second costume. Third if you count the one he stole from Fang.
Which he only wore in Uncanny X-Men 107, 108 and Iron Fist 15 before very quickly ditching it in X-Men 109. Dave Cockrum, whose last issue as penciler was 107, intended for that to be Wolverine's new permanent costume and was apparently a little miffed when John Byrne decided to go back to the original design.
 
I read in an interview with one of the creative team that the reasoning behind that was that they were self-conscious at the time of Wolverine being considered a Timber Wolf knock-off, and didn't like the idea of him wearing a costume from another, more direct Timber Wolf knock-off.
 
It interesting how often costumes change these days. It was often decades before a costume changed. Now they seem to change with every creative team.
 
I read in an interview with one of the creative team that the reasoning behind that was that they were self-conscious at the time of Wolverine being considered a Timber Wolf knock-off, and didn't like the idea of him wearing a costume from another, more direct Timber Wolf knock-off.
I've heard Byrne just didn't like the costume. So he switched it back ASAP. Later created the tan and brown. He introduced the tan and brown because there are no blue and yellow wolverines. (Don't hate Michigan fans) Another story I've heard was Jim Lee calling up Byrne, proud he had changed Wolverine back to the blue and gold, forgetting it was Byrne who created the tan and brown. :lol:
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top