Not till we see a recast of Ten Forward waiter #5Since Maddox andwere recast, but the rest of established Trek lore characters were not, you know what that means?Icheb
25% different.
Not till we see a recast of Ten Forward waiter #5Since Maddox andwere recast, but the rest of established Trek lore characters were not, you know what that means?Icheb
25% different.
#notmyemperorIan McDiarmid taking over from Clive Revill? I'm out. No more Star Wars movies for me. That is just wrong.
Creating a new character is more preferable to me at this point in time because of the outrage and near-castigation of CBS by accusing them of maleficence towards Brophy. It's all too conspiratorial.
Maybe I'm just unlucky and happened to be on 3 different sites talking about the same thing...But is there really a whole lot of "outrage"--or just a few grumbles on the internet? In the long term, this will be have no lasting impact whatsoever and, at best, become something to look back on and laugh.
"Hey, remember when we spent days arguing about recasting 'Bruce Maddox' of all characters? What were we thinking?"![]()
When I found out Jeffery Hunter wasn't playing Pike on Discovery, I cancelled my CBS subscription right away.
Why? If they could bring Brophy back, then why not? There's nothing to be "good" about creatively, since we don't know why Brophy didn't return. It sounds to me like you're just being petty for fan reasons, not creative ones.
Just so you are aware, I first posted this picture around here well over a month ago, before the first episode even aired and heavily speculated that it was going to be Maddox...It's not about his acting warranting his return (whatever that means; he wasn't bad) but the fact that the character returned. If it's between creating a new character and non-Maddox-Maddox, then a new character would have been less irksome.
Why? If they could bring Brophy back, then why not? There's nothing to be "good" about creatively, since we don't know why Brophy didn't return. It sounds to me like you're just being petty for fan reasons, not creative ones.
So contemporary life can be strange and kinda shitty, true.
So, yeah, this. Again, my idea was if you're going to recast, at least show us a picture of the guy earlier on so we're not expecting something else for 5 episodes. I was kind of looking forward to seeing an actor I, or most, hadn't seen in a while. Tarantino famously spoke to this in his casting of Kill Bill.
I don't know that it's conspiratorial or outrage-inducing, but it does warrant some discussion on a fan bulletin board, yeah.
I am surprised you didn’t do it when Mark Lenard wasn’t used as Sarek.
and your cancellation spared you the anger over Leonard Nimoy not playing Spock.
Because...While the episode itself is memorable, the only line I remember of Brain Brophy’s is two words, delivered over the top: “A machine!”
Brophymania.Feel the Broph? #Bromentum
Nope. Then people would be outraged that they didn't use Maddox, and debating why they didn't...If it's between creating a new character and non-Maddox-Maddox, then a new character would have been less irksome.
The punctuation in the thread title alone fairly screams it.Reading the OP indicates there is outrage there.
But it won't be any where near as fun as the SOMBRERO Thread was.But is there really a whole lot of "outrage"--or just a few grumbles on the internet? In the long term, this will have no lasting impact whatsoever and, at best, become something to look back on and laugh.
"Hey, remember when we spent days arguing about recasting 'Bruce Maddox' of all characters? What were we thinking?"![]()
Because in the alternate universe where Brophy played the part, you would have somehow gone, "Nah, I'm good." Huh? If it doesn't matter to you who plays the part, but it does to lots of others, why not kill two birds with one stone and Brophy play the part?How am I being petty? I just don't care that a one off character was re-cast.
As mentioned multiple times above, it was eye-rolling then and also one that's been talked about time and again. Hell, why not recast Sisko every fourth episode? It's just a TV show. Doesn't amount to a hill of beans in this world. Get over it, nerd.It's happened in trek before, 3 times in DS9 for example.
I wouldn't care if anything changed in the portrayal of Maddox (although, if his original dickish Maddox also managed to be sympathetic, maybe that'd have created a more complex character?), but it would have been nice to come from the same face, voice, and mannerisms we know as the character. And kinda cool to see a face we haven't in so many years, and maybe to see a non-current actor pull it off....and considering his last tv role was in 2011 as a background character, i'm not convinced much would change in terms of his portrayal of Maddox.
That could have been anyone? Like, honestly, if Jurati pulled up Maddox's personnel file while she was doing the exposition for Picard in the pilot, there would have been way less expectation.Just so you are aware, I first posted this picture around here well over a month ago, before the first episode even aired and heavily speculated that it was going to be Maddox...
![]()
Some people would be...mildly?...nearly imperceptibly?...dissapointed, but Maddox could have been just another scientist who tried and failed to duplicate Data thirty-five years ago. That dick, wanting to take Data apart prematurely... This series raised him, above the thousands of other cyberneticists in the galaxy, to have succeeded now. Well, shucks, okay; let's see him.Nope. Then people would be outraged that they didn't use Maddox, and debating why they didn't...
I'd prefer a flashback to a hospital room with a guy wrapped up in bandages. Head to foot. Then I would be at peace.if you're going to recast, at least show us a picture of the guy earlier on so we're not expecting something else for 5 episodes.
No. It must be a voice-over of, "The part of Bruce Maddox will now be played by..."I'd prefer a flashback to a hospital room with a guy wrapped up in bandages. Head to foot. Then I would be at peace.
Yes. I forgot that part.No. It must be a voice-over of, "The part of Bruce Maddox will now be played by..."
That much is obvious. Though, don't tell the Shatner lovers.Actor doesn't equal the character.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.