• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Best photos yet of the new Discoprise - Studio Model

Did.... did they flatten the saucer?
Because it looks as it the Enterprise here has only one deck on the saucer!
I don't think so. Looks thick enough for two decks to me

RQhvr2W.png
 
Excellent news on what looks like the window for two reasons: 1) it brings the Enterprise more in line with the DSC continuity and 2) hopefully more people will like Star Trek now because they’ll be able to understand it better.
Ouch, the sarcasm is so dry that I need a drink... :cool:

here are some comparison images @ITDUDE screencapped from a Trekyards video. Just to note, this model is from a mobile game, so 1. The quality isn't great and 2. there are some inaccuracies...
Interesting. Minor inaccuracies notwithstanding, what the side-by-side comparison underscores for me is that the show took an approach practically guaranteed to please nobody. If you're in the camp that really thinks the original Enterprise design looks "dated" and somehow unfit for modern audiences, then the DSC version is so damn close to the original (deflector dish and all!) that it's not really an improvement. On the other hand, if you're in the camp that loves the original, there are enough differences (including the bulgy nacelles, shorter neck, bridge window, etc.) that it's obviously not the same ship.

So the "appease modern audiences" rationale become moot. Which leaves only the question of which design is more aesthetically pleasing. And that is an irreducibly subjective question, as some people will say...
it looks way better.
...whereas I emphatically disagree. To my eye the original design is beautiful, a joy to look at. This one looks squat and unbalanced, as several other posters have been describing.

I'm firmly in the camp that thinks that the only ship design in Trek that ever improved on the original Enterprise was the TMP refit design. The people who did that one beat the odds. But that was a daunting task, and the folks behind DSC don't seem to have been up to it. If they couldn't improve it, they should have left it alone.

And having flat ships in Discovery were a design directive from Fuller.
They were? I've heard him blamed for the redesigned Klingons and the squarish nacelles, but this is the first time I've heard the flatter ships pinned on him. What's your source? It always seemed to me like an obvious Eaves-ism.
 
They were? I've heard him blamed for the redesigned Klingons and the squarish nacelles, but this is the first time I've heard the flatter ships pinned on him. What's your source? It always seemed to me like an obvious Eaves-ism.

It was from one of the Eaglemoss booklets. I don't remember which one.

Also why is it an Eaves-ism? He only designed one flat'ish ship for the canon before Discovery came along.

Edit: He also designed the 'Intrepid' from Enterprise.
 
What do you mean? Every major ship Eaves has designed looks flat, from the Ent-E to the Shenzou to the Discovery itself. Lots of the minor ones as well.
 
What do you mean? Every major ship Eaves has designed looks flat, from the Ent-E to the Shenzou to the Discovery itself. Lots of the minor ones as well.
I said BEFORE Discovery. Re-read my post.

And as I said the flat part was a Fuller directive.
 
It is more squashed, but I believe Eaves in that the differences in design were made purely for legal reasons. I think the bridge windows look nice and make for good effect when crew members are looking out over the hull at what's going on. A closed room with a viewscreen gives a more claustrophobic effect.
 
The 1701-D had a giant skylight on top of their bridge.

As did the original 1701 in 'The Cage'. Maybe? Not sure if that zoom in was meant to imply that was a window or not.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top