If they wanted to use the refit, they should have just used the refit.
I don't think so. Looks thick enough for two decks to meDid.... did they flatten the saucer?
Because it looks as it the Enterprise here has only one deck on the saucer!
A TMP era set series would have been more fitting for Discovery. Uncharted territory, advanced looking ships. Color up the uniforms and you might have a winner on your hands.If they wanted to use the refit, they should have just used the refit.
They didn't ruin it at all, and they're still selling TOS merchandise.TOS is the cultural icon, the one that is the easiest to make money off of. So that is the one CBS has to ruin.
Ouch, the sarcasm is so dry that I need a drink...Excellent news on what looks like the window for two reasons: 1) it brings the Enterprise more in line with the DSC continuity and 2) hopefully more people will like Star Trek now because they’ll be able to understand it better.
Interesting. Minor inaccuracies notwithstanding, what the side-by-side comparison underscores for me is that the show took an approach practically guaranteed to please nobody. If you're in the camp that really thinks the original Enterprise design looks "dated" and somehow unfit for modern audiences, then the DSC version is so damn close to the original (deflector dish and all!) that it's not really an improvement. On the other hand, if you're in the camp that loves the original, there are enough differences (including the bulgy nacelles, shorter neck, bridge window, etc.) that it's obviously not the same ship.here are some comparison images @ITDUDE screencapped from a Trekyards video. Just to note, this model is from a mobile game, so 1. The quality isn't great and 2. there are some inaccuracies...
...whereas I emphatically disagree. To my eye the original design is beautiful, a joy to look at. This one looks squat and unbalanced, as several other posters have been describing.it looks way better.
They were? I've heard him blamed for the redesigned Klingons and the squarish nacelles, but this is the first time I've heard the flatter ships pinned on him. What's your source? It always seemed to me like an obvious Eaves-ism.And having flat ships in Discovery were a design directive from Fuller.
They were? I've heard him blamed for the redesigned Klingons and the squarish nacelles, but this is the first time I've heard the flatter ships pinned on him. What's your source? It always seemed to me like an obvious Eaves-ism.
I said BEFORE Discovery. Re-read my post.What do you mean? Every major ship Eaves has designed looks flat, from the Ent-E to the Shenzou to the Discovery itself. Lots of the minor ones as well.
A closed room with a viewscreen gives a more claustrophobic effect.
I knew it looked familiar:
![]()
![]()
They're in a tin can in space.
The 1701-D had a giant skylight on top of theirs.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.