Now, now...their benign neglect gave us the whole show with really very little interference.Am I the only one that thinks WB couldn't make a right decision to save it's life?
Even a broken clock is right twice a day, but not WB.

Now, now...their benign neglect gave us the whole show with really very little interference.Am I the only one that thinks WB couldn't make a right decision to save it's life?
Even a broken clock is right twice a day, but not WB.
Now, now...their benign neglect gave us the whole show with really very little interference.Comparatively speaking.
Oh, I'm every bit as cynical. Or more so. Their net cost was actually zero due to the way it was done through PTEN. The subscribing stations actually financed the show with license fees. That's why we got a fourth season even though PTEN didn't really exist anymore after the third. There's a story in the script books of how the show *didn't* get financed by WB for the fourth season and JMS and Netter (and Copeland?) took out a loan to start production. Eeek!I was thinking, should I say that? How can I complain about the studio that made my favorite show? But after all that I've read and heard over the years, I think they did it as a write off rather than because they believed in it in any way. So that's why.
Didn't WB once claim that they'd never made any money from the DVD sales for B5 or am I imagining that? I can't locate definitive information to confirm one way or the other.
JMS' participation statement shows that B5 has never 'made money'. Which is true given the nature of bookkeeping. While it's common to rag on studios as keeping crooked books, even I, an outsider but a bookkeeper can pretty much say that there's nothing crooked about it.Didn't WB once claim that they'd never made any money from the DVD sales for B5 or am I imagining that? I can't locate definitive information to confirm one way or the other.
^It certainly rings a bell.
Studios are known for pulling these kinds of shady book keeping tricks to make out they're making a loss in order to avoid paying residuals or claim some kind of tax deduction. IIRC a favourite method essentially involves charging themselves over the odds for catering services, consultation fees and other ill defined expenses.
Something similar, yes. Just as it would all of the other WB shows. It's pretty basic: All of the revenue generating departments share the non-revenue costs of running the studio.Jan, didn't JMS say that if a set burned down in South Africa it came out of B5's profit?
You guys know about the looping, right?
I have started my re-watch of B5, most of it I have not seen since they originally aired in the 90's. So its a bit of treat to watch some episodes I have forgotten about, Just got thru season 1's 'Signs and Portents', great to see our first real introduction to Morden and the Shadows, I had forget about of the episode until I re-watched it yesterday. Was also great to see my friend Walter (Koenig) as Bester again. Sad about Jerry Doyle, I had met him 4 years ago when we had a big dinner/toast for Walter a day before his 'Star on the walk of fame' ceremony. Jerry was a great guy.
I don't think you're supposed to with him. He is what the mundanes fear about telepaths which, ironically, is all a creation of the telepath laws and Psicorp that the mundanes created. Mundane prejudice created the very thing they feared.I like the character of Bester but in the interviews on the dvds he mentions the telepaths and prejudice and all that, but his character sometimes just doesn't make me want to feel for the telepaths.
I bought my DVD's at very a very-low per-season price. Which, if enough others did likewise, might explain the lack of profit from same.
It more depends on the retailer agreements (i.e wholesale costs). after all the retailer might have already bought that stock so the studio would already have had it's cut and later sold stock at a reduced margin to clear.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.