They only ask King to be creative and be himself give them something creepy and he delivers. He creates his own characters and does as he wishes. And I don't do trek or sci-fi writing, It doesn't suit me and im not a fan of the genre.
We weren't talking about Stephen King and, more to the point, we weren't talking about original fiction, we were talking about
Star Trek fiction, and you
do have to follow the rules to write tie-in fiction of any sort.
I am kind of curious what you're doing here if you're not a fan of the genre, since this is a forum about
Star Trek books. (Not that you're not welcome, I'm just confused.)
A writer needs to be in it because its a calling, not because your good at it.. not because you like to write and sure the hell not for money or fame. Any other reason is senseless.
Aaaaaand this is nonsense. Utter, total nonsense. The technical term for writers who aren't in it to be paid is "hobbyist." But professional artistic endeavors are
always for money, and what's more always have been. The myth of the starving artist is just that: a myth, perpetuated by failed artists who needed an excuse for their failure. Those who think true art can't be created under such restraints should recall that Michelangelo's painting of the Sistine Chapel's ceiling was a media tie-in work-for-hire.[/QUOTE
Did he ever say why he's here if he's "Not a fan?" I dont understand either.