• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

another new uniform pic

The Mighty Monkey of Mim said:
It's still inconsistent because that's not what he (or anyone else) was wearing in the "Tapestry" (TNG) flashback of his Academy days.

Well, to be fair, "Tapestry" was an illusion generated by Q anyway. Maybe Q decided to embellish things a bit. :p

In any case, what "really" happened will always trump any flashback. The pic in NEM was exactly that: a picture. It was taken. It is an exact recording of reality. That's different from a flashback, which is just a memory. Sometimes people don't remember things exactly (i.e. Valtane's "death" in VOY's "Flashback" when it didn't happen 'IRL' ).
 
Babaganoosh said:
Well, to be fair, "Tapestry" was an illusion generated by Q anyway. Maybe Q decided to embellish things a bit. :p

In any case, what "really" happened will always trump any flashback. The pic in NEM was exactly that: a picture. It was taken. It is an exact recording of reality. That's different from a flashback, which is just a memory. Sometimes people don't remember things exactly (i.e. Valtane's "death" in VOY's "Flashback" when it didn't happen 'IRL' ).
Ok then, according to what you just proposed...

Whatever cadet uniform we see in Trek XI will be what they "really" looked like, and the illusion created by the amusement park planet based on Kirk's memory in "Shore Leave" was inaccurate.

Either that or cadets, just as officers, have choices about what they wear at different times.
 
The Mighty Monkey of Mim said:
Whatever cadet uniform we see in Trek XI will be what they "really" looked like, and the illusion created by the amusement park planet based on Kirk's memory in "Shore Leave" was inaccurate.

Ok, I'm cool with that.

Either that or cadets, just as officers, have choices about what they wear at different times.

Somehow I doubt that cadets have much of a choice in anything. :p
 
Well, the larger point is that the history of Trek is full of little (along with a few large) inconsistencies that we the audience initially perceived as distracting "errors" but which we have been able to rationalize or outright ignore within the larger picture without the need for excluding that episode or film from the same continuity as the others. Trek XI will likely be no different.
 
Babaganoosh said:
The Mighty Monkey of Mim said: Hell, NEM had Cadet Picard wearing a TWOK-era noncommissioned officer's uniform!

That's not inconsistent. Those uniforms of that era had identical uniforms for cadets and noncoms. Only the shirt worn underneath it was different (for cadets, red; noncoms, dark blue).
Saavik was NOT A CADET. She was a COMMISSIONED OFFICER.

These words have actual meanings. "Cadet" is a term used to describe someone who was a civilian before and is on their way to BECOMING an officer. A cadet has not yet seen any service.

I was a cadet once. All officers were at one point, BEFORE THEY BECAME OFFICERS.

All officers also return for training from time to time, as they go from one general level of responsibility to another. Note that Army and Navy rank structures are different... a Navy "lieutenant" is equivalent to an Army "Captain," and a Navy "Captain" is equivalent to an Army "Colonel." And a Navy Admiral is equivalent to an Army General.

Why did I point out those particular ranks, rather than ALL ranks? Because those are the ranks where you ARE REQUIRED TO RECEIVE ADDITIONAL TRAINING FIRST.

A naval Lieutenant will be returned to school to learn basic leadership, something that a junior officer would not be expected or required to exercise. And... GLORY BE... isn't that EXACTLY what Saavik was doing? The CADETS (wearing different uniforms) were being LED. Not by "Cadet Saavik" but by LIEUTENANT SAAVIK.

Yes, I know I've said this about a dozen times and have just kept having to repeat myself. But this is NOT accidental either in "Where No Man Has Gone Before" or in "The Wrath of Khan." In both cases, it's a LIEUTENANT (Kirk or Saavik) who is at the Academy, but in a position where leadership is being developed, not basic skills.

Please TRY to assimilate this piece of info, OK? Starfleet is closely patterned on the US Navy in many if not most ways, and the rank structure is one of the most obvious examples of that.
cooleddie74 said:
If he were on a training cruise on another ship and it stopped for brief R&R, yes he'd be allowed to crash and relax. We don't see any other ships at K-7 in the episode, but that doesn't mean his vessel and commander didn't come back a little later to retrieve him.
Nah, sorry, still not buying it. Assuming a cadet would be lucky enough to get time off from what must surely be a brutal and very busy schedule (how often do you think cadets at our own military academies get leave?), there's no way that he'd get left *alone* there.
Really? Gee, I'd have SWORN when I WAS IN THAT POSITION I got leave, and got to travel home on holidays... and that I DID travel in-uniform sometimes.

I take it you're not basing your assessment on any actual personal experience, huh?

I don't necessarily accept that this guy WAS a cadet, as I've made clear before, but at the same time there's no evidence that he wasn't.

This is the really funny (and sometimes, in extreme cases, very SAD) aspect of Trek fandom. We all think of this so seriously that we tend to build our own "fantasy version of the universe" inside of our individual heads, without any justification or support whatsoever, then react viscerally if anyone contradicts any part of what we've built up in there.

By the way, there IS another example of this uniform. But not the blue version. Go back and watch "Balance of Terror" and see what the commander of station #4 is wearing. It's the same basic fabric, but gold/tan. And he's no cadet. So, add that into the list of "sightings."

My guess? These uniforms were "test items" Bill Theis put together, and they decided that the material didn't look good on-screen, but they reused them several times anyway.

In-universe? Maybe it's an old version that just hasn't been replaced across-the-board yet (look at the US Army... some units still have old-style BDUs like I used to wear, but most have now transitioned to the new "digital BDUs). Or maybe it's a uniform specific to "ground duty stations" (as opposed to mobile craft)? Or maybe it's just a regular uniform variant (the military is full of those!).

Bottom line... there is NO REASON to conclude that this is a cadet uniform. But with the bit from "BoT" I think that there IS reason to conclude it's not "Academy-wear."
And certainly not in a dive like K-7. As Worf pointed out on DS9, most of K-7 isn't even habitable. Apart from the bar.

Any cadet lucky enough to get any kind of break would probably go home to his or her family for the duration.
All cadets get "some kind of break."

And if that cadet wasn't from, say, EARTH, he may have been in-transit to go back and visit his family.

All this "it's not POSSIBLE" stuff is just silly. WE DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING except that this was a costume hanging on one of Bill Theis's racks that got reused a couple of times which was different than the ones we're used to seeing.

However, based upon the BoT use of the gold variant of this uniform, I'm no longer as strongly in favor of this being the "cadet" uniform as I was before. Even given that, when Kirk (or Saavik) took the Kobayashi Maru test, NEITHER WAS A CADET.
 
Basil said:So . . . you were a Starfleet cadet?
No. So... you're a moron?

I think I've been quite clear what I'm saying. And I think I've been quite clear about how Star Trek's rank and command structure is based almost entirely on the US Navy model.

If you really, really don't want to pick up on that, that's your call. But don't you DARE try that sort of snide bullshit with me. You know goddamned well what I was saying and your "cute" attempt to turn it into something mockable says more about you than about anyone else.
 
Cary L. Brown said:
Basil said:So . . . you were a Starfleet cadet?
No. So... you're a moron?

I think I've been quite clear what I'm saying. And I think I've been quite clear about how Star Trek's rank and command structure is based almost entirely on the US Navy model.

If you really, really don't want to pick up on that, that's your call. But don't you DARE try that sort of snide bullshit with me. You know goddamned well what I was saying and your "cute" attempt to turn it into something mockable says more about you than about anyone else.
Starfleet isn't the U.S. Navy, never was, probably never will be. Your rant, cursing, and bullying doesn't change that.
 
Basil said:
Cary L. Brown said:
Basil said:So . . . you were a Starfleet cadet?
No. So... you're a moron?

I think I've been quite clear what I'm saying. And I think I've been quite clear about how Star Trek's rank and command structure is based almost entirely on the US Navy model.

If you really, really don't want to pick up on that, that's your call. But don't you DARE try that sort of snide bullshit with me. You know goddamned well what I was saying and your "cute" attempt to turn it into something mockable says more about you than about anyone else.
Starfleet isn't the U.S. Navy, never was, probably never will be. Your rant, cursing, and bullying doesn't change that.
Starfleet was patterned almost exclusively upon the US Navy. Your inability to fathom that is more a matter of your own hard-headedness than of a lack of truth behind it.

And "bullying?" How, exactly, am I "bullying?" Oh, right... I'm actually speaking from personal experience, and I don't agree with you. Authority, even hard-earned authority, if it disagrees with your own pewsonal widdle feewings equals "bullying?" :rolleyes:

Once again.

You are the one here who is stating things in ABSOLUTES. You state that this is true, that this is not. You've got your own personal "fantasy version" of things in Trekdom that you've built up in your head and you're arguing it with the conviction of a True Believer (tm).

But the thing is... YOUR OPINION IS ONLY THAT. All we know is that Bill Theis made these costumes and they got used in a few "background character" shots, but never by any major characters in the series. We can suppose, based upon (1) their existence, and (2) certain comments made in historical Trek production stories, that Theis experimented with different materials before settling on the velour he eventually went with. We can't even be CERTAIN of that.

All we know is where and when certain uniforms were seen. Anything beyond that is supposition. Even if you, my friend, close your eyes, stomp your feet, and wish REALLY REALLY HARD that what you want it to be turns out to be true.

Where this particular bit came up was with YOU stating that "cadets DO NOT GET TIME OFF." You were making a BULLSHIT comment about, not Star Trek, but about REAL LIFE.

And you were just talking out of your ass, pal. When I see someone spouting bullshit about things they have no clue about, I call them on it. And yes, I called YOU on this line you were feeding out.

You seem not to like having been caught making up "good-facts" to support your own personal "preferred version of reality." Oh well.

The reality is that cadets get time off. The truth is that we don't KNOW what that uniform was. The truth is that they can put ANY UNIFORM THEY LIKE into this movie as a "cadet uniform" and it will in NO WAY contradict anything we actually KNOW to be true.

If it contradicts what you REALLY REALLY WANT to be true... that's just too bad.
 
Fuck. Who knew a uniform for a fictional organisation could arouse such strong feelings?

Well, I did know. Still, it never ceases to amaze.
 
Cary, if you have a weakness, it's not knowing when to NOT write a 1000-word argument in response to a post containing only one sentence fragment. :D
 
ancient said:
Cary, if you have a weakness, it's not knowing when to NOT write a 1000-word argument in response to a post containing only one sentence fragment. :D

:lol:

Agreed, Cary. You make some good points, but less is more. (So you don't lose your audience mid-post.)
 
Babaganoosh said:
Cary L. Brown said: when Kirk (or Saavik) took the Kobayashi Maru test, NEITHER WAS A CADET.

We actually have no idea what rank Kirk had when he took the test.

I don't think it would make much sense to give a command test to someone who isn't even a jr. officer yet. I'd imagine Saavik's case was the standard: a Lt. going for Commander would certainly need a command-level test.

Troi went through a similar test in TNG and she was a Lt. Commander, not a cadet. Forget the name of the ep., but in the test simulation she had to be willing to sacrifice a fellow officer in order to save the ship. In other words, order someone to go to their death. That sort of thing is command-level officer training, not cadet training.

(whew...we're going kinda off topic here.)
 
ancient said:
Babaganoosh said:
Cary L. Brown said: when Kirk (or Saavik) took the Kobayashi Maru test, NEITHER WAS A CADET.

We actually have no idea what rank Kirk had when he took the test.

I don't think it would make much sense to give a command test to someone who isn't even a jr. officer yet.

Nonetheless, he's right: Kirk's rank when he took the test is unestablished.

The only clue we have is in dialogue: "The Kobayashi Maru scenario frequently wreaks havoc with students and equipment. As I recall you took the test three times yourself."

Abrams and company can say whatever they like without contradicting established continuity.
 
Actually, Babaganoosh your statement is incorrect.
When McCoy is talking to David and Saavik inside Regula 1, he states specifically
"You are looking Lieutenant at the only Star Fleet cadet to beat the no win scenario."

McCoy states to a serving officer that Kirk was indeed a CADET.
 
Eurosolo said:
Actually, Babaganoosh your statement is incorrect.
When McCoy is talking to David and Saavik inside Regula 1, he states specifically
"You are looking Lieutenant at the only Star Fleet cadet to beat the no win scenario."

McCoy states to a serving officer that Kirk was indeed a CADET.

I stand corrected. If we treat McCoy's statement as good continuity then Kirk has to be a cadet when he takes the test. :lol:
 
Eurosolo said:
Actually, Babaganoosh your statement is incorrect.
When McCoy is talking to David and Saavik inside Regula 1, he states specifically
"You are looking Lieutenant at the only Star Fleet cadet to beat the no win scenario."

McCoy states to a serving officer that Kirk was indeed a CADET.

Not that I give a jot.

I've always been fascinated about how literal minded Trek fans are, how they extrapolate generalizations out of particulars and assume when people speak they're always being specific and literal when in real life humans tend not talk so literal like or with historical specificity.

What McCoy said is literally true in as much Kirk was at one time a cadet of that we can be pretty sure. Its also true he was the only one to beat the test... it need not follow however he was a cadet at the time he overcame the challenge since that's not what the Doctor is really saying. All he's telling us is Kirk a one time Starfleet cadet did beat the scenario.

My point humans aren't so literal when they say stuff like that.

Sharr
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top