Well, if we can't have more books per year, at least the ones we get can be long. I remember when I'd read Trek as a kid and books were like 250 pages or less. I much prefer the typical length of today's books.
Me too. I definitely prefer longer books to shorter ones.
I don't know if you'd care to reveal anything about the content, Christopher, but did your background reading include DS9's Millennium Trilogy? It included a great deal of temporal musings.
Cool. I always appreciated their explanation for the unspoken rule that if you travel in time by one method, you can only return to your original time period by that same method.
Yes, and Millennium contains some of the most solid temporal physics discussions in all Trek lit. I tried to keep my model of temporal physics in DTI essentially consistent with what they established, as much as I could. And there are references to a few other time-related Trek novels as well, though some are merely passing nods.
Just out of curiosity, are we seeing them dealing with the time travel incidents as they happen or are they after the fact references?
Wouldn't the causality-breaking nature of time travel pevent the profession from being 'reactive'?
If the investigator limits itself only to reacting, not using time travel himself, while the perpetrator can jump back in time, refining its actions, then the investigator will never catch a perpetrator armed with such a powerful tool.
Or... has it already been awesome?^Ok, I'm gonna just say it... this book is going to be AWSOME!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.