I've said this before and I'll probably say it again at some point but for me STNG ended with 'All Good Things...'.
The movies.... what are those.![]()
They were missed opportunities. Not without some merit or watch-ability (I'd buy the 4K blu's, the movies are good), but generally were not as stellar as the 80s films - TNG films more often feel like a bunch of set-pieces and ideas plopped into a ball like gobs of clay, and made more for fanservice than continuing a thematic and linked story worthy of the big screen. 80s Trek movies were embryonic of a new style with a loose arc of recurring and expanding developments, but that's held up more than TNG's freewheeling and rushed, clipped-ending standalone flicks. Even secondary characters (Chekov, et al) had better reasons for returning to the Enterprise than TNG's (read: Worf and with each subsequent movie installment, his reasoning for being there got both more and more feeble, and more and more small universe syndrome. It's not quite unlike each movie regarding Data's <<fused-and-can't-be-removed-and-stuck-on//on-off switch added//is now removable but doesn't take it to the planet where he's acting out of anger at starfleet//what's an emotion chip?>> "emotion chip". (All this isn't to say the 80s films didn't have whoopsies, they did... just not as many, many are more easily explained anyway, or as lackadaisically thrown in.) But I unsurprisingly digressed.)
Then again, over the last few decades, some now opine how television feels larger and more epic with running themes and movies feel cheap. I'll agree television shows now have incredible budgets to achieve theater-worthy effects...