Frankly, this episode was SO good that it caused a major problem: It wrapped up the show so well that the movies couldn't rise to meet the bar of quality this set.
Maybe there shouldn't have been TNG movies and just end it with this, and the other characters making recurring appearances on DS9 or something.
Even though I enjoy some of the TNG movies to varying degrees, I tend to agree with this. AGT was such an excellent way to end the series that anything after-the-fact feels tacked on. If they had found a way to make Q the antagonist of the final Trek movie (and turned that particular story in something of a trilogy with Farpoint and AGT), I would have been very pleased.
Put me in this category, too. Happened to catch it last night on the SyFy network (well flipped back and forth between it and the Kentucky-Mississippi basketball game).
The episode was almost
too good. It's not just good
Star Trek, it's good science fiction.
Now, there's a lot more "talk" in it and less action in it than I remembered, and a few very conveniently placed friends to move the story (Data, Crusher, Riker and Worf are all almost too usefully placed in the future).
But I think with some fiddling, it could've become a very good big screen movie. If they were hellbent to glory to use Shatner in the first movie, given the time jumps, Kirk could've even been written into the story.
In a way, with the characters and their relationships, the theme of trust and growing to think beyond normal bounds, the paradox driving the story, and the unusual antagonist (not a real villain, just Q, who is actually
helping in a way), it would've embodied so much of what
good Star Trek is. It had the "big idea." Unfortunatley for B and B going into the movies, they left their best story back on TV with AGT.
Anyway, my two cents after seeing it again for the first time in quite a while.