I didn't. I hate fake moralizing. They can't let Ward die so easily (well Whedon might) so of course poor Skye would chose to save his life. It's so plainly obvious that it felt insulting.
By the way did anyone else find it odd that.That Coulson basically resigned from SHIELD because of T.A.H.I.T.I which sort of contradicts The Avengers
I think it shows that HYDRA had Nazi roots and is still seen by a Nazi organization by most, but not seen that way by many or most of the HYDRA members.
Which, as I said, is probably a rationalization.
Honestly it's very likely that the HYDRA of 2014 is very different from the HYDRA of the 1940s.
I think they did previously reference Blonsky as being at the Fridge...but would Garrett be stupid enough to release him if he had no means of controlling him...?
I don't think it was "fake" -- well, except in the sense that it's an imaginary story about people who don't exist. I think it was a chance for Skye to prove that she's a better person than Ward and Garrett.
I think it's important to give heroes chances to show why they're better than the villains. I'll never understand shows that have protagonists who are just as lethal and cruel and ruthless as their enemies. Why should we root for them in that case?
What makes them better? In that case it might as well just be a story about gang warfare, with the sides picked arbitrarily.
The MCU has been frustratingly lacking in protagonists who show regard for human life, so I'll take that show of basic human decency any way I can get it.
He didn't resign from SHIELD, he stepped down from oversight of that specific project and recommended its cancellation.
Yes, as I argued myself earlier in the discussion. But there's merit in the counterargument too. However they may have evolved,
Although I seem to recall a promo pic that had Hill and Coulson hugging, but don't recall that happening in the episode (which is a shame, Coulson could use a hug).
But why make Skye a better person. Why not let Skye be awful and see how that develops the character.
Because comic books and TV shows like AoS are about empowerment fantasy and beating and killing thugs in the name of justice makes you "the good guy".
It's part of our tribal instincts to pick a side and root for them. Hence that's why Americans are the good guys even though we murder children with drones.
In a society where torture is okay, I'll live with my heroes just being selectively violent.
I think they did previously reference Blonsky as being at the Fridge...but would Garrett be stupid enough to release him if he had no means of controlling him...?
No they didn't, they said "cryo-cell in Alaska." The "Alaska" part may be why you're thinking it's the Fridge, but the Fridge is obviously not in Alaska.
... What makes them better? In that case it might as well just be a story about gang warfare, with the sides picked arbitrarily.
It's part of our tribal instincts to pick a side and root for them. Hence that's why Americans are the good guys even though we murder children with drones.
He didn't resign from SHIELD, he stepped down from oversight of that specific project and recommended its cancellation.
If you can, you should watch the show again. Coulson said he was handing in his resignation. It's not clear though if it's from SHIELD or that specific project.
Sorry but that is not only completely unsupported by any dialogue from Coulson, it is not a good story.Coulson's death ultimately united the Avengers. Coupled with Hydra working alongside SHIELD, he may fear the Avengers might disband should his secret of being alive comes out.
Thank goodness you made that a spoiler, I doubt any board members want that plotline revealed in advance.... What makes them better? In that case it might as well just be a story about gang warfare, with the sides picked arbitrarily.
It's part of our tribal instincts to pick a side and root for them. Hence that's why Americans are the good guys even though we murder children with drones.
First of all, their are a lot of people who don't consider Americans the good guys, including Americans. Second, the bushmen of Madagascar don't pick sides and welcome outsiders (for a time before sending them away) and they are as tribal as you can get. It's our culture that's trained to pick sides, not instincts. Third,In regards to drones murdering children, it's not like some General said "Oh look, a child. Shoot him!", there are many factors including; bad intel, there was a terrorist cell there that was supplemented with families prior to an assault, or the target was a terrorist cell and other cells thought it would be wise to blow up kids and place the bodies there to discredit Americans.
But why make Skye a better person. Why not let Skye be awful and see how that develops the character.
Because comic books and TV shows like AoS are about empowerment fantasy and beating and killing thugs in the name of justice makes you "the good guy".
If you can, you should watch the show again. Coulson said he was handing in his resignation. It's not clear though if it's from SHIELD or that specific project.
Well we only saw one half of that conversation; we're missing Fury's response. It's likely he was resigning from SHIELD, but Fury didn't accept his resignation and instead took his advice and shut down TAHITI.
Although I seem to recall a promo pic that had Hill and Coulson hugging, but don't recall that happening in the episode (which is a shame, Coulson could use a hug).
Deleted scene.
Well we only saw one half of that conversation; we're missing Fury's response. It's likely he was resigning from SHIELD, but Fury didn't accept his resignation and instead took his advice and shut down TAHITI.
I'd actually call that rather unlikely. Coulson's very loyal to SHIELD and believes in what it stands for. Fury and Coulson tried something with benevolent intentions, but it went horribly wrong and Coulson wanted it to be abandoned. That doesn't mean he'd lost faith in the entire organization.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.