• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Abrams Directing Star Wars

Here's my main hope for Abrams's Star Wars: he dumps John Williams as the composer (using the SW theme and opening, of course; Disney will mandate that) and films the thing in a faster paced and more modern style.

I think it's a safe bet Michael Giacchino will do the music, although I can't imagine Williams not being asked or turned down. Williams will probably just step aside. It's a new regime. Giacchino would probably keep the main and end title music and then do his own thing, while keeping it "Star Warsy." Abrams will also most likely bring a brand new look to the franchise since he doesn't have Lucas's "everyone on vitural sets" stiffness. Whether one likes his visual style or not, it DOES have energy. He may keep it closer to the original trilogy style than Star Trek, but he'll bring his own pacing and energy to the project. There may be a feeling that since it's "episode 7" they want to keep the look close to what had come before, but who knows?

I see nothing but good things for Star Wars, honestly.

Considering Lucas is apparently so anal about Star Wars that he wants 20th Century Fox to distribute Episode VII just so it'll have the same logo at the start that Episodes I-VI had, I'm not so sure he'll allow Abrams to deviate too much from the style of days gone by.
 
Here's my main hope for Abrams's Star Wars: he dumps John Williams as the composer (using the SW theme and opening, of course; Disney will mandate that) and films the thing in a faster paced and more modern style.

I think it's a safe bet Michael Giacchino will do the music, although I can't imagine Williams not being asked or turned down. Williams will probably just step aside. It's a new regime. Giacchino would probably keep the main and end title music and then do his own thing, while keeping it "Star Warsy." Abrams will also most likely bring a brand new look to the franchise since he doesn't have Lucas's "everyone on vitural sets" stiffness. Whether one likes his visual style or not, it DOES have energy. He may keep it closer to the original trilogy style than Star Trek, but he'll bring his own pacing and energy to the project. There may be a feeling that since it's "episode 7" they want to keep the look close to what had come before, but who knows?

I see nothing but good things for Star Wars, honestly.

Considering Lucas is apparently so anal about Star Wars that he wants 20th Century Fox to distribute Episode VII just so it'll have the same logo at the start that Episodes I-VI had, I'm not so sure he'll allow Abrams to deviate too much from the style of days gone by.

Well, that fanfare intro leading into the main title rocks. I'd have been that anal, too. Don't forget that Lucas resigned from the DGA over the structure of the beginning of the OT films.

That entire intro from the fox fanfare to the ellipsis at the end of the crawl is almost like a trademark. If it were me, I'd stipulate that the crawl must be there, the font of the crawl, the music, a lot of things that make the beginnings all distinctive and intrinsic to the first six films.
 
One concern regarding Williams (although the man hasn't seemed to slow down yet) - He is 81.
 
I won't be shocked in the least if Lucas has the right connections within the industry to keep 20th Century Fox as the distributor of the third Trilogy. I know Disney now owns Lucasfilm and the Disney folks would carve their name and logos on Mount Rushmore if they had the legal leeway to do so, but as CC said the opening Fox fanfares of the first six Star Wars films are some of the most legendary and iconic opening sequences of any movies in the entire history of cinema. I don't see Lucas giving up on a Fox distribution deal without the biggest fight he and Kathleen Kennedy can muster.
 
Since the 20th logo is so iconic to the SW brand, something like this could work swapping the order of 20th and Disney (and dropping the Pixar)

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FjIi_HyydM[/yt]
 
That opening isn't iconic, it's just familiar.

Frankly, Star Wars did more to boost the status of the 20th logo than the logo does for Star Wars. A Disney logo there will do just as well.

Disney does a lot of variants, tailoring their logo to individual films.

[yt]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1eLFy-QIBg[/yt]

[yt]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwpCa2QCNto[/yt]

I'd like to see their Star Wars variant. ;)
 
I was just looking at some of the topics about this over at a star wars forums and someone mention that ben affleck was in the running to direct star wars number 7.
 
I was just looking at some of the topics about this over at a star wars forums and someone mention that ben affleck was in the running to direct star wars number 7.

Everyone was in the running. But Abrams seems to have been selected even if no actual official announcement has been made. Hell, news on TV and radio is even running with this news. If this turns out to be a hoax, a lot of people are going to be embarassed.
 
Affleck's a talented director. He's not shown real interest in fantasy films, but I'd certainly not be alarmed if he were directing a Star Trek movie.
 
And, here we go courtesy of the L.A. Times:

According to Paramount Vice Chairman Rob Moore, Abrams — who directed both 2009′s “Star Trek” and the upcoming sequel “Star Trek Into Darkness” — will still be involved in some capacity with a possible third “Trek” movie, at the minimum as a producer, if not also directing the film.

Moore also pointed out that Abrams will continue to play a role in another of the studio’s most valuable franchises, “Mission: Impossible.”

“J.J. will continue to develop projects for us including a new ‘Mission: Impossible,’ and he is committed to produce another ‘Star Trek,’” Moore said Friday afternoon.

With 2009′s big-screen reboot of the beloved television and movie series, Abrams won over a new generation of audiences with a broadly entertaining and accessible take on Gene Roddenberry’s venerable cast of characters — and satisfied hard-core fans by creating a place for Leonard Nimoy to appear as Spock alongside Zachary Quinto’s new take on the beloved Vulcan.

Anticipation for the May 17 sequel is astronomically high. Paramount wisely began stoking interest in “Star Trek Into Darkness” starting late last year, with the release of a plot synopsis, a poster, a teaser, a trailer and then rolling out nine minutes of footage before Imax 3-D showings of Peter Jackson’s “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey.”
.
.
.
If Abrams does not direct, that could leave either Lindelof or Kurtzman and Orci in the director’s chair, or perhaps another Abrams associate such as filmmaker Matt Reeves, who helmed the Abrams-produced monster movie “Cloverfield”...

It seems for now Abrams’ relationship with Paramount remains strong — every film Abrams has directed or produced since 2006′s “Mission: Impossible III” has been for the studio, where Bad Robot enjoys a lucrative first-look deal.
So, for folks who thought maybe this was going to produce a change in the direction of the Star Trek films and franchise:

Tough shit.
 
^You mean those who were "hoping it would change the direction."

And I concer with your sentiment. :)
 
So, for folks who thought maybe this was going to produce a change in the direction of the Star Trek films and franchise:

Tough shit.

I doubt anyone was expecting that. Cultural degeneration doesn't change overnight. Anyway JJ seems OK. The writers are probably the bulk of the problem. But thanks for caring. :lol:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top