That's really pushing it. The show is never graphic, and the staginess (and often hamfisted approach to many moral dilemmas and politics) aren't quite true to life either. Idealization is far more common than the alternative and whatever sordidness there is is fairly tame."gritty-uncompromising, tough, true to life, unidealized, graphic, sordid."
At times, Babylon 5 was VERY much this.
Nonsense, their native language is Italian.Yes, and their native language was "English", so obviously that was REALLY what they called their top guy.
But it's not a word joke: Republics tend not to have emperors. We can call them Res Publica and Imperator but the general meaning is the same. So, yes, that's an 'alien' aspect of Centauri culture.
What does that have to do with them being alien? You claimed Babylon 5 made aliens more ALIEN (or tried to). As I've rather pointedly elaborated it didn't, fundamentally speaking, do this any more than Star Trek had already done by that point.I didn't say it was "better" than Star Trek, although in some ways it was, as, like most elements, there was no reset switch, and everyone came out on the other side fundamentally changed somehow.
I'd like to read that, actually. Sounds interesting.There was an article recently which dealt with the most influential TV shows in recent history.
Is that a Joss Whedon fansite? From the way you described it I assumed it was in a TV magazine or something, my bad.I'll find it for you, if I can. The link was over at www.whedonesque.com. If I find it, I'll post it here.
I don't suppose we could get back to focusing on TGB's reviews, could we? The sidebars are understandable and interesting, but we're veering away from the focus of TGB's topic.
^
Aw. I mean, "Infection" sucks. It'd be more fun to discuss it if someone was defending it.
DS9's debt to B5 with the Cardassian-Bajoran arc is contestable, given they both aired simultaneously and the DS9 crew were fairly adamant they didn't watch the show on the most part. Also, being one of five most influential sci-fi/fantasy programs of the 1990s is a sort of limited field.
The other article you linked me to was a far more interesting read, I see you've removed it, presumably because while its analysis of TV in the 2000s is fascinating and it does mention some important 1990s precursors (like, indeed, Buffy) Babylon 5 isn't mentioned once.
Honestly, it's astounding B5 managed to keep an audience with some of the early episodes. It'd be like if DS9 had followed up "Emissary" with "If Wishes Were Horses" and "Move Along Home."
All I can say is that you need to repeat the B5 season 1 mantra: "Stick with it, it gets a hell of a lot better"
Probably. I've never read anything of the kind outside of geek circles, but then, I'll admit I've never looked for it.Bottom line, though, there are folks out there giving cred to B5 for all kinds of reasons.
It's a Star Trek forum. I think it's not unreasonable to say there's always been an overlap where these geek interests are concerned. The people posting here are also all people who remember Deep Space Nine, for example.There was a reason it reached out and got attention, and inspires threads like these on a regular basis.
An interesting example to be sure, but not one that credits B5 for any influences. At least this list used an actual photo from the series; I read a similar list once that used a photo from one of the unsuccessful spinoffs.
And the others are Firefly and Farscape.Babylon 5 is one of them.
[...]
Yes, like the decadent old world European French/Italian empire. The alien bit is that they call it a Republic but they're ruled by an Emperor. Kooky!
[...]
And then Caesar was killed by Brutus, there were a few civil wars and this Augustus fellow is left with the keys to the house (by way of Egypt, the grain, like spice, must flow.)Actually that is not something, that never happened in human history. The Romans appearently thought of their nation to be an Republic and referred to it as such even after the Roman Republic was transformed into an dictatorship by Caesar.
http://www.ew.com/ew/gallery/0,,20224286_8,00.html
What do they all have in common? They're space operas with people on space stations or spaceships. This is why you'll see more Babylon 5 threads than Twilight Zone threads.
Or Spacehunter. Or Starcops. Or Space 1999. Or Lost In Space, even. I can go on. These don't get talked about to the level of B5, if at all.
Yes, Farscape and Firefly get mentioned a lot, too, on the level of Babylon 5. Why? Because they are also high quality shows that did something different with the genre, and people noticed them for being SHOWS, not just space shows.
Or Spacehunter. Or Starcops. Or Space 1999. Or Lost In Space, even. I can go on.
Or Spacehunter. Or Starcops. Or Space 1999. Or Lost In Space, even. I can go on.
I wasn't comparing Babylon 5 to those. I was comparing it to cult series that aren't space operas. That's why I brought up The Twilight Zone, which topped the list you linked and yet doesn't really generate a lot of thread traffic. Even The Prisoner, say, really just got attention because of its remake (and woe betide the man who dares proclaim that show isn't awesome.)
It's pretty obvious the three most referenced long-ended sci-fi cult series on these forums are space operas, and it's equally obvious as to why.
Here's another, in EW's top twenty of all time, science fiction shows...
http://www.ew.com/ew/gallery/0,,20224286_8,00.html
Can you owe a debt to your own show?Whether Battlestar Galactica was influenced by it at all is another question; that show owes an obvious debt to Deep Space Nine so I guess that'd be a thorny issue anyway.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.