I never really liked it, but I accepted it as useful for new viewers. However, they are no longer new viewers, so I don't see the point.
i honestly have no desire to even download this episode or watch it on iplayer. rest in peace doctor who.
Actually, the Amy intro makes it sound like the show is about AMY and her travels/adventures with the doctor
How did she know it was her last kiss with him? She could just try grab him and snog him again. But seems to imply reverse order if his first is her last. I don't buy that though.They are grossly out of sync, and it's often 'in reverse,' at least for all the key moments. His first meeting with her was her last with him. His first kiss with her was her last. etc.
How did she know it was her last kiss with him? She could just try grab him and snog him again. But seems to imply reverse order if his first is her last. I don't buy that though.They are grossly out of sync, and it's often 'in reverse,' at least for all the key moments. His first meeting with her was her last with him. His first kiss with her was her last. etc.
Actually, the Amy intro makes it sound like the show is about AMY and her travels/adventures with the doctor
Well, frankly, these days, it is.
Just like Series One and Two were about Rose and her adventures with the Doctor. And Series Three was about Martha and her adventures with the Doctor.
Really, Series Four and the Specials were the first Doctor Who seasons not to be told from the point of view of the companion. There's a reason that "Rose," "Smith and Jones," and "The Eleventh Hour" all began with the companion meeting the Doctor rather than beginning with the Doctor meeting the companion. The Doctor wasn't the POV character.
I wasn't taking it just in a literal way. River did look genuinely shocked at the fact it was his first.How did she know it was her last kiss with him? She could just try grab him and snog him again. But seems to imply reverse order if his first is her last. I don't buy that though.They are grossly out of sync, and it's often 'in reverse,' at least for all the key moments. His first meeting with her was her last with him. His first kiss with her was her last. etc.
Moffat's said that River was describing broad patterns, not every individual encounter. People need to stop being so literal.
I've just realised that there's either a huge plot hole, or that there's a big piece of this story yet to be told.
In "The Impossible Astronaut," River told Rory about how the Doctor first appeared to her when she was a little girl, and how he knew everything about her despite her never having met him before, and how it started her fascination with him.
That does not match IN ANY WAY with what we saw in this episode. Here River was an adult when she first met the Doctor, and she already knew all about him, both from Amy's stories and because she'd been raised to believe her mission was to kill him. If this was the first time she met him, then she couldn't have met him as a little girl, whatever the incarnation (Melody, Mels, River). Likewise, the Doctor didn't know who the girl in the spacesuit was, he didn't recognise Mels, had never seen her before in fact, so he couldn't have visited her as a little girl, and the River we know never even was a little girl.
So unless River was lying to Rory (which she had no reason to do), or Moffat made a massive mistake (and as a rule he doesn't make that kind of mistake), then there's a lot more to this story than has yet been revealed.
Also, if River (aka Melody) actually was the girl in the space suit, why did Adult River act like she didn't remember being that girl when she was investigating alongside the Doctor in TIA? Just because she didn't want to expose him to "spoilers" ?
.
I've just realised that there's either a huge plot hole, or that there's a big piece of this story yet to be told.
In "The Impossible Astronaut," River told Rory about how the Doctor first appeared to her when she was a little girl, and how he knew everything about her despite her never having met him before, and how it started her fascination with him.
That does not match IN ANY WAY with what we saw in this episode. Here River was an adult when she first met the Doctor, and she already knew all about him, both from Amy's stories and because she'd been raised to believe her mission was to kill him. If this was the first time she met him, then she couldn't have met him as a little girl, whatever the incarnation (Melody, Mels, River). Likewise, the Doctor didn't know who the girl in the spacesuit was, he didn't recognise Mels, had never seen her before in fact, so he couldn't have visited her as a little girl, and the River we know never even was a little girl.
Also, if River (aka Melody) actually was the girl in the space suit, why did Adult River act like she didn't remember being that girl when she was investigating alongside the Doctor in TIA? Just because she didn't want to expose him to "spoilers" ?
.
I've just realised that there's either a huge plot hole, or that there's a big piece of this story yet to be told.
In "The Impossible Astronaut," River told Rory about how the Doctor first appeared to her when she was a little girl, and how he knew everything about her despite her never having met him before, and how it started her fascination with him.
That does not match IN ANY WAY with what we saw in this episode. Here River was an adult when she first met the Doctor, and she already knew all about him, both from Amy's stories and because she'd been raised to believe her mission was to kill him.
Actually, River didn't tell Rory she was a "little girl" when she first met the Doctor, she says she was a "young girl" which could be interpreted as her bieng as old as in her 20s.
I think there is more significance to his reaction to the kiss than we might have figured. River seemed troubled that she and the doctor did not have a 'relationship' involving kissing before that kiss. Almost as though she worries that something has gone amiss in the timeline, that time has been rewritten for him but not for her. :confusing much??:I wasn't taking it just in a literal way. River did look genuinely shocked at the fact it was his first.
That was my first thought when they started talking about said question.So, is the answer to the unknown question 42?
That would certainly be an interesting twist on the old joke and show title. But does that mean The Doctor's name is 42?So... the unknown question. If it is hidden in plain sight, then surely it is...
"Doctor Who?"
In other words, what is the Doctor's real name? And the Silence believe that Silence will fall when that question is asked.
That line had me in stitches. If we see the antibodies again in the future, will it become the new "Exterminate" and "Resistance is futile?"Remain calm while your life is extracted.
I completely agree on this point, unfortunately, although it should be noted that it's not just Moffat's fault. RTD started the ball rolling but Moffat kept it going. With each regeneration (either full-on/proper or false/fake-out) I finding myself wishing they would tone it down. I really don't like the whole standing up regeneration with super gold glowing energy pouring all over the place out of the head and sleeves. I much preferred the quieter, somber, reflective regenerations of old instead of the spastic, hyperactive regenerations (although I realize that mode is reflective of the current show).I was disappointed by this episodes and here are my reasons why:
1: Regeneration has lost all significance and wonder and magic and bittersweetness that it once had. It used to be that the Doctor regenerated only when he was finally defeated in some way or if he had to make a final act of sacrifice. It represented the end of a character we had grown to love and admire even if we often disliked him at first. As much as I initially disliked and prejudged each new Doctor, I grew to love and lament the loss of each of them from Hartnell to Tennant. That was the magic of regeneration. Now it's a plot device, drained of all emotional impact and meaning.
That was my first thought when they started talking about said question.So, is the answer to the unknown question 42?
I think there is more significance to his reaction to the kiss than we might have figured. River seemed troubled that she and the doctor did not have a 'relationship' involving kissing before that kiss. Almost as though she worries that something has gone amiss in the timeline, that time has been rewritten for him but not for her. :confusing much??:I wasn't taking it just in a literal way. River did look genuinely shocked at the fact it was his first.
But no, they are not meeting in reverse order that much is clear. The matching diaries and synching them up, and the already mixed up order of their meetings.
Any reason the Doctor who tackles injustice and tyrants didn't care to do anything about Hitler? Would have appreciated a line from him about why he won't overthrow or prevent Hitler.
I completely agree on this point, unfortunately, although it should be noted that it's not just Moffat's fault. RTD started the ball rolling but Moffat kept it going. With each regeneration (either full-on/proper or false/fake-out) I finding myself wishing they would tone it down. I really don't like the whole standing up regeneration with super gold glowing energy pouring all over the place out of the head and sleeves. I much preferred the quieter, somber, reflective regenerations of old instead of the spastic, hyperactive regenerations (although I realize that mode is reflective of the current show).Regeneration has lost all significance and wonder and magic and bittersweetness that it once had. It used to be that the Doctor regenerated only when he was finally defeated in some way or if he had to make a final act of sacrifice. It represented the end of a character we had grown to love and admire even if we often disliked him at first. As much as I initially disliked and prejudged each new Doctor, I grew to love and lament the loss of each of them from Hartnell to Tennant. That was the magic of regeneration. Now it's a plot device, drained of all emotional impact and meaning.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.