The Nebula-class (USS Sutherland) that Data commanded in "Redemption II" should have also used a Galaxy-style bridge, since Nebulas appear to have the same kind of bridge module based on the exterior structure. However, it also appeared quite small and unnecessarily cramped.I realize the DS9 production crew wasn't able to use the Enterprise-D bridge because of filming on Generations, but that set seems so ridiculously cramped for a Galaxy-class starship -- and I rewatched "The Jem'Hadar," and you never see anything forward of the command area, you don't see the viewscreen or Conn/Ops -- that even though you know what the set blueprints are, maybe you've got some license to fudge with it.
edit: And I just restated most of what you already said. That's why I shouldn't post at 5:00 in the AM.![]()
I'm sure the producers once again thought the idiot fandom would get the two ships "confused" if they used the same sets. Same reason nobody ever saw the USS Sovereign or any of her sisters during the main battles of the Dominion War, despite being framed as one of Starfleet's most powerful and advanced ships.