the poster that I was commenting on has a very narrow minded and naive view of "Hollywood" writing, and the film industry. Laughable, actually...
You disagree that Hollywood picks which films to make based on which ones will likely make the most money?
So, why, exactly, do you think they're making films? Artistic merit? Fun? What?
I'd think that if you held such a minority view, you'd want to explain it. But you still haven't.
Hollywood is not one omniscient entity which "puts out" Serenity and "falls back" on Terminator... Like any other business, Hollywood plays a game of "trial and error"... but that was not the point of my initial post...
It's an industry like any other, with tens of thousands of individuals involved. Projects are proposed, developed, written, and produced. The success of a project depends upon a multitude of things... the writing, the marketing, the public awareness/perception, demographics, franchise, and a hundred other variables...
And before you jump on me, I am VERY aware of the distictions between market viability and critical artistic acclaim (of which the new Trek film has, REMARKABLY, seemingly achieved both...!)
My initial contention was with the poster's concept of "Hollywood" as a greater-than-though, single universal, penultimate entity that makes and breaks the end all, be all of what the unwitting public can and should appreciate: A single, unified force that is capable of making decisions on what could, should, and would be liked by the public. "Hollywood" (of which I am a part, though I live and write in NY) is a vast conglomeration of writers, directors, actors, crew, editors, producers, and more...
I didn't mean any offense (other that the initial sardonic jab, I must admit)---but having been writing for film/tv for quite some time (and no, I won't give any details, I joined this bbs to talk about Star Trek, not the film industry [my bad], and no, I've not done anything "big" like Trek" or BSG... my writing has been mostly cable network Discovery Channel, MSNBC, Discovery Channel, TLC stuff... [admittedly, I aspire to write for such great projects as Star Trek...])
But honestly, no offense was intended, but I was a bit taken aback at
hal9500's post, as it's an issue that I deal with daily, and which consistently drives me crazy...
Oh---and as to your jibe about the "q" vs. "g" typo, when you type at 80+ words a minute, there are many more kinds of typos than where letters fall on the keyboard. There's also how the mind perceives letter shapes, word forms, sounds, typography, and syntax. Just an FYI. EVERYONE makes typos... You do too... unless they're predominant, let's not make an issue, okay?
