• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

2any better

I liked Star Trek V. Although the humour's very hit-and-miss, it captures the characters really well. The film most evocative of The Original Series itself.
 
Wow, think about this...

Here we have someone who just watched Khan FOR THE VERY FIRST TIME. And to boot, he's never seen Space Seed.

I can't fathom that.

Of course, I had seen Space Seed before Khan. And I remember seeing Khan in the theater, and have watched it so many times over the years I can't even guess at how many times.

Add to that I've seen everything of Trek that has aired, all the movies, all the TV shows, all of it.

Would almost be worth being able to selectively erase your memory just so you could have the feeling of experiencing something like Khan again for the first time.

Wow.


er, I'd never seen "space seed" when I first saw TWOK. It's not like it's impossible to follow on its own or any less enjoyable without having seen the episode first.
Yeah, you can easily follow it without having seen "Space Seed." I had probably seen TWOK a dozen times before I ever watched the TOS episode. The only line that always confused me was when Khan says, "On Earth, in 1996, I was a prince...." It's a weird line if you don't know the backstory!
 
The only line that always confused me was when Khan says, "On Earth, in 1996, I was a prince...." It's a weird line if you don't know the backstory!

Because that's not what he says.

"On Earth, two hundred years ago, I was a prince with power over millions..."
 
Actually, I just checked, and Khan did mention the year.

"You mean... he never told you the tale? To amuse your captain, no? Never told you how the the Enterprise picked up the Botany Bay lost in space from the year 1996, myself and the ship's company in cryogenic freeze?"

"I've never even met Admiral Kirk."

"Admiral Kirk? Admiral? Admiral...
 
I could have sworn he said 1996 in the movie...

http://www.scifiscripts.com/scripts/startrek2_wrathofkhan.txt

I tried a word search on "1996", but it was quoted as "... lost in space from the year nineteen-ninety-six..."

The date of Khan's departure also appeared in numerous press releases of the day.

I think they were shrewd enough not to reference the actual dates in the movie...

Certainly they kept the time of his reign to "1990s".
 
Actually, I just checked, and Khan did mention the year.

"You mean... he never told you the tale? To amuse your captain, no? Never told you how the the Enterprise picked up the Botany Bay lost in space from the year 1996, myself and the ship's company in cryogenic freeze?"

"I've never even met Admiral Kirk."

"Admiral Kirk? Admiral? Admiral...

Aha! I knew it! :lol:
 
I think the general consensus is that Star Trek II is a much better film than Star Trek: The Motion Picture as it returns to the roots of the original series more than the original movie. It's also got plenty of action, which the first movie lacked in spades but it made up for this in other ways.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, Khan does say both - he does say 1996 AND two hundred years ago. All during the scene on the planet.

And I never said you can't watch Khan without watching Space Seed. Just that many people had seen Space Seed before ST II.

As for TMP VS TWOK, yeah, most people consider Khan superior. It's a much more entertaining movie, with more action. And it has an entirely different look and feel. Just the change in the uniforms makes it feel completely different. Those uniforms got seen from Khan on, while TMP dress was never visited again AFAIK.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top