Now I'm imagining an HBO executive saying something like "Per every million viewers each season gets, we grant you one dragon."GoT had to earn those fucking dragons from HBO, one wing at a time.![]()
Now I'm imagining an HBO executive saying something like "Per every million viewers each season gets, we grant you one dragon."
I don't even recall seeing a shuttle, much less a DISCO one.I would have rather seen a TOS shuttle there, but it doesn’t really matter since I missed it anyway.
Sure, why not. There's still a steam locomotive near my house, and my wife would love to have a carriage, so she wouldn't mind.Back to the original discussion, I wonder how many eyebrows would be raised if a steam locomotive where to appear in a contemporary drama...and think about some carriage from the 13th century!
Why? Trek fans, as established, are a varied group, and sarcasm is very much a part of most Trek fans I have known. Star Trek fans are still human and sometimes enjoy sarcasm, and looking at ideas as sideways. I slowly beginning to get that somehow Trek ships rise to the levels of characters for some-for reasons that continue to elude me, at least on an emotional level. But, even with things that I like I am very sarcastic.You should be above that type of behavior when you're part of this great Trek community.
There's joking sarcasm, and then there's derogatory sarcasm.So, I guess I'm not "above" such behavior and therefore don't belong in the "great" Trek community.
And both are part of human expression and experience.There's joking sarcasm, and then there's derogatory sarcasm.
One's meant in good jest, the other is meant to be offensive towards the other party.And both are part of human expression and experience.
Or, it's just making fun of an idea that the person finds ridiculous and is not intended as personal attack because ideas are not the same as people. I know it's easy to take offensive, especially online were sarcasm is less than clear but there is a line between attacking a person and heaping scorn upon an idea. At least, for me. My ideas, my opinions, are not me.One's meant in good jest, the other is meant to be offensive towards the other party.
Just because it's part of the human experience, doesn't mean it's necessary to pick a fight with another person.
That's why I have no issue with what you said to me while the other guy just acted douchey about the same issue.Or, it's just making fun of an idea that the person finds ridiculous and is not intended as personal attack because ideas are not the same as people. I know it's easy to take offensive, especially online were sarcasm is less than clear but there is a line between attacking a person and heaping scorn upon an idea. At least, for me. My ideas, my opinions, are not me.
Some things don't require comment. Most douchey things don't require a response.That's why I have no issue with what you said to me while the other guy just acted douchey about the same issue.
Why are the VFX artists so lazy as to re-use 2239 era Discovery Shuttles in 3188?
I tend to agree with Commander Cockins on this one, they must be trolling us.
Were the TNG guys trolling the fans when they used marker pens as warp nacelles? TNG needed background ships so they glued various model kits and a bunch of crap together. Discovery needed background traffic so they reused a 23rd century shuttle as one of the blurry flying cars.It’s the creators just trolling the fans
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.