• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

13-year old not allowed to fly American flag at school.

But none of that really has anything to do with the kid flying a flag from his bike. The school cited "safety concerns" for asking him to stop flying the flag, but didn't go into any details. The kid himself and his parents didn't mention any kind of problems from other kids harassing him, so I think it's just a silly overreaction. But so is thinking this is some kind of major national issue that is indicative of a movement to trample on American's right to display their patriotism.
This sums it all up very well. Essentially people are trolling themselves into these broader, more incendiary concerns. The bikers trolled themselves, because this is what they're looking to get off on.
A lot of people are trolled into talking about patriotism vs. nationalism, free speech, etc., not realizing that this incident has little or nothing to do with any of that. You have to focus down to the level of the microcosm of the school environment - a very undemocratic, institutionalized building full of pubescent children, the safety of which the school is responsible for some 35+ hours/week. This can lead to some arbitrary and wrong situations, but it is not the battleground for all that is good and right and white in this world. It was just an admittedly bad decision.
 
I don't think anyone here said it was offensive nationalism. And, as others in this thread have said, it's not quite clear why the school originally asked the boy to not display the flag on his bike so it's quite a stretch to argue that that was what they were thinking. You're making a lot of assumptions here, Rush, that others might find insulting.
Actually, quite a few posters have said that nationalism is wrong. It is also quite wrong when those of opposing opinion keep saying "there must be more to it than reported" for the ban to occur.

Yes, of course, nationalism is wrong. Do you seriously disagree with that? How can thinking yourself superior to someone else only due to where you were born ever be right? :vulcan:
If you had read my post more closely, you would have noted that I said that no one in this thread has called what the boy did offensive nationalism (because it isn't), which was what Rush seemed to imply. Apparently, he just went on a rant only very slightly related to the topic at hand without telling us but I thought he was commenting on it.
And how can saying that there probably is more to the topic be wrong when the school actually hinted at that in its statement? Rush's rant implied certain motives for the school's action which aren't really in evidence from the few facts we know about this. So I pointed that out.


Personally I find any organized chanting of oaths, pledges, hymns or prayers very, very uncomfortable to watch and listen to.

Not a sports fan, I take it? ;)

The national anthem is hardly ever played at sports events here.
 
We definitively need a Dalek smiley.

Here you go:

DalekExtmnt.gif
 
That's a cute picture and all but despite the similarity to the Italian fascist's and later the Nazi's Roman-inspired salute (which is why FDR switched it to the hand over the heart) the earlier Bellamy salute has nothing to do with Nazi ideology and nationalism. You're just Godwinning the thread and mucking up a valid argument.

IIRC, the raised-arm salute was popular long before Fascism or Nazism because it was seen (wrongly) as being originally Roman.

The Italian Fascists used it because to them, 'Roman' meant 'Imperial Roman.' The French revolutionaries, by contrast, used it because to them, 'Roman' meant 'republican.'

Apparently, it was David's Oath of the Horatii which encouraged this perception:

the_oath_of_the_horatii-large.jpg


And later, his picture of the Tennis Court Oath:

the_tennis_court_oath-large.jpg


Oaths2.jpg


Oaths1.jpg


In each of these cases, the gesture is associated with oath-swearing and pledge-taking, rather than as a salute. I've also seen evidence that it was used in this way under Napoleon as well:

Couder_-_Installation_du_Conseil_dE.png


I assume that Bellamy had this sort of thing in mind. It's interesting to note that, in the United States, the fasces is used as a symbol for this reason as well, despite its association with Fascism--on the seal of the United States Senate, for example.

The difference, of course, is that the raised-arm salute was adopted by the Nazis, while the fasces was not.
 
I don't think anyone here said it was offensive nationalism. And, as others in this thread have said, it's not quite clear why the school originally asked the boy to not display the flag on his bike so it's quite a stretch to argue that that was what they were thinking. You're making a lot of assumptions here, Rush, that others might find insulting.
Actually, quite a few posters have said that nationalism is wrong. It is also quite wrong when those of opposing opinion keep saying "there must be more to it than reported" for the ban to occur.

Yes, of course, nationalism is wrong. Do you seriously disagree with that? How can thinking yourself superior to someone else only due to where you were born ever be right? :vulcan:
If you had read my post more closely, you would have noted that I said that no one in this thread has called what the boy did offensive nationalism (because it isn't), which was what Rush seemed to imply. Apparently, he just went on a rant only very slightly related to the topic at hand without telling us but I thought he was commenting on it.
And how can saying that there probably is more to the topic be wrong when the school actually hinted at that in its statement? Rush's rant implied certain motives for the school's action which aren't really in evidence from the few facts we know about this. So I pointed that out.


Personally I find any organized chanting of oaths, pledges, hymns or prayers very, very uncomfortable to watch and listen to.

Not a sports fan, I take it? ;)

The national anthem is hardly ever played at sports events here.

Nationalism doesn't usually mean 'I am superior to you' it means 'I am proud of my nation and like it best.'

And it also refers to national movements, which I think we can agree rightly shaped Europe and the Americas. The Middle East and Africa are dysfunctional largely because they have arbitrary colonial divisions.
 
Nationalism doesn't usually mean 'I am superior to you' it means 'I am proud of my nation and like it best.'

I'd say that is commonly understood to be patriotism. Nationalism usually is rather exclusive concerning groups that don't fit the formula of national identity that's being promoted.


And it also refers to national movements, which I think we can agree rightly shaped Europe and the Americas. The Middle East and Africa are dysfunctional largely because they have arbitrary colonial divisions.

I don't think Sector 7 was using the word to mean that. Regardless, Europe only became functional after a lot of ethnic cleansing had taken place. So I'd say nationalist movements are a good thing.
 
We were careful at my own school, a bunch of us cadets in AFJROTC decided that if shit went down we'd break out the drill rifles (demilled, but heavy and good for bludgeoning) and rally round the flag. Fortunately we didn't have to.
I am proud to know you. Many of my fellow veterans have fought and died for the flag: the SYMBOL of our nation and its freedoms.

You two are quite scary.

Thank you. I realize that, as a German, you have understandably fused the concepts of nationalism and patriotism with racism, jingoism, and xenophobia. But elsewhere in the world, we value our national symbols.

We remember everyone who fought and died for that same flag. We haven't had a revolving door of governments in the US like you have in Europe. We've had a single nation in a single incarnation. And we would do whatever we need to protect it.

That doesn't mean we're going to round people up and kill them because of their race. Americans are not any one race, religion, or political ideology.
 
I'd say that is commonly understood to be patriotism. Nationalism usually is rather exclusive concerning groups that don't fit the formula of national identity that's being promoted.

Patriotism is passively supportive, nationalism is actively supporting your country.
 
I am proud to know you. Many of my fellow veterans have fought and died for the flag: the SYMBOL of our nation and its freedoms.

You two are quite scary.

Thank you. I realize that, as a German, you have understandably fused the concepts of nationalism and patriotism with racism, jingoism, and xenophobia. But elsewhere in the world, we value our national symbols.

We remember everyone who fought and died for that same flag. We haven't had a revolving door of governments in the US like you have in Europe. We've had a single nation in a single incarnation. And we would do whatever we need to protect it.

Including wanting to illegally bludgeon teenagers with the butt of your rifle over vandalism. You're a real hero.
 
Ok, you have your own definition of the term, it seems. I was using the word the way it's usually used. But maybe that explains Sector 7's reaction though. He might have a similar notion about nationalism as you do.
 
I am in agreement with a Constitutional Amendment to make the burning of the flag of the United States of America illegal.
Then you are an enemy of freedom.

It should be banned on a lower level. Publicly setting fires should be considered arson and when politically motivated to cause fear or anger it is incitement or menacing.

No burning anything in public.
So no grilling burgers and brats in the park?
 
I am in agreement with a Constitutional Amendment to make the burning of the flag of the United States of America illegal.
Then you are an enemy of freedom.

It should be banned on a lower level. Publicly setting fires should be considered arson and when politically motivated to cause fear or anger it is incitement or menacing.

No burning anything in public.

Which is funny given that many would support a flag burning ammendment are the same who get out there an want to burn books they disagree with and I'm pretty sure they'll be mightly pissed if they can't burn the Koran, the King James Bible or the latest Harry Potter.

But hey as long as you apply it to the book burner, the flag burners and everyone else in between then fairer than just banning on side.
 
^ What about during the game?

Except for World Cup football, I don't watch any kind of sport.
Is there any other kind of sport? :confused:


We definitively need a Dalek smiley.

Here you go:

DalekExtmnt.gif
:techman:

I am proud to know you.
You two are quite scary.
Thank you.
:wtf:

We remember everyone who fought and died for that same flag. We haven't had a revolving door of governments in the US like you have in Europe. We've had a single nation in a single incarnation. And we would do whatever we need to protect it.
:wtf:

I'd say that is commonly understood to be patriotism. Nationalism usually is rather exclusive concerning groups that don't fit the formula of national identity that's being promoted.
Patriotism is passively supportive, nationalism is actively supporting your country.
Isn't it nice to invent your own meaning for words?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top