Way to spoil the biggest twist in the film in your first paragraph, USA Today! If this is any indication, AoS will probably massively spoil the film for those who haven't seen it.
Deatails on the show being "retooled" for the final six episodes. But if this was the plan all along, how is really being re-tooled?
http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/...s-of-shield-tv-series/7313369/?linkId=7899022
It's clearly governed by an international council, though. So, either way, the United States doesn't control SHIELD.
Sci said:However, Natasha's reference to working for the KGB is anachronistic; the KGB was dissolved in late 1991, when Natasha would have been about seven years old. Either the KGB (and possibly the Soviet Union itself?) still exists in the Marvel Cinematic Universe of 2014, or Natasha actually worked for the FSB, the KGB's post-Soviet successor. (Which, admittedly, the FSB is made up largely of the same people operating
In The Avengers she enlists the help of a young girl, probably no older than 5 or so, to lure Banner to the meeting location. Banner quips/asks if they really "started them that young" (or words to that effect), BW: "I did."
So it's "possible" she worked for the KGB at a very young age for whatever reasons.
But it also seems likely the Soviet Union lasted a little longer in the MCU than it did our as also in Avengers BW says, grimmly, "Regimes rise and fall everyday. I'm Russian, I'm used to that."
The plan seemed a bit nuts to me though. I could see picking off people here and there but blitzing everyone at once seems like the turmoil would have been off the charts.
The KGB stopped a lot of it's official operation in 1991, but it took a while to dismantle. And could well have been continuing to carry out whatever it liked behind closed doors, training a new generation of assassins would not be out of the question.
The plan seemed a bit nuts to me though. I could see picking off people here and there but blitzing everyone at once seems like the turmoil would have been off the charts.
Well, yeah -- that was the point. It was a coup -- a global coup. One of their targets was the U.S. President himself. They wanted to cripple the world's governments, militaries, and superheroes, and take over in the resultant chaos.
Don't blame me, I voted for Ellis.
The plan seemed a bit nuts to me though. I could see picking off people here and there but blitzing everyone at once seems like the turmoil would have been off the charts.
Well, yeah -- that was the point. It was a coup -- a global coup. One of their targets was the U.S. President himself. They wanted to cripple the world's governments, militaries, and superheroes, and take over in the resultant chaos.
It just seems to me like that degree of immediate Chaos would be difficult to capitalize on. Wouldn't it be more effective to infiltrate and subvert existing organizations and power structures rather than rain hell?
What Rogers thought was especially wrong was assassinating people who hadn't actually done anything wrong, but who simply constituted "threats" to security.CorporalCaptain, Nick Fury in the beginning said that the gun platforms on the Hellicarriers could lock onto specific DNA.
Rogers felt that was wrong.
But he thought that it was bad that you could target someone with complete certainty from orbit, when really what a DNA scope is used for by someone after world peace is to whack entire families.
Sure you could've hit Bin Ladin with one bullet from 30 thousand feet and saved the world 10 year ago, but with those guns, you could have also exterminated his entire line, all his children, siblings, cousins, parents, grand parents, aunts and uncles...
All gone.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.