Well... since it's either the first and last names of deceased Beatles put together, or the inventor of the marine chronometer that keeps perfect time across longitude - I never figured it could be anything other than a nom de plume.
As long as he doesn't turn out to be Khan!
Not necessarily. He could turn out to be Pike's bastard son, or someone elses long lost family member or somethng. "Who he is" doesn't necessarily mean a named canon character
Wrong.
It tells us that when his identity is revealed it will be a big moment- someone known even to casual Trek viewers as bad ass.
It ain't Muddy nor Mitchell.
I think he is a rejuvenated Capt. Robert April with super strength and I think that ship that Kirk is space diving to is April's Enterprise.
Not necessarily. He could turn out to be Pike's bastard son, or someone.
Wrong.
It tells us that when his identity is revealed it will be a big moment- someone known even to casual Trek viewers as bad ass.
It ain't Muddy nor Mitchell.
...
It's not necessary to be so dismissive and arrogant about it all the time. Especially since you've been this way with both peple saying he is Khan and with people saying he isn't Khan at different times. Are you going to apologize to the folks you've treated harshly who said it's not Khan when it's discovered it isn't or if it turns out he actually is Khan, are you goig to apologize to those you teated harshly who said he is Khan?Not necessarily. He could turn out to be Pike's bastard son, or someone.Wrong.
It tells us that when his identity is revealed it will be a big moment- someone known even to casual Trek viewers as bad ass.
It ain't Muddy nor Mitchell.
...
Yes, necessarily. It's an adventure movie, not a soap opera.
My Name Is Legion said:It tells us that when his, identity is revealed it will be a big moment- someone known even to casual Trek viewers as bad ass.
It ain't Muddy nor Mitchell.
