I am looking forward to the forthcoming Avengers movie, and have so far seen most of the previous movies, aside from CapAm and Hulk.
CapAm simply because ive yet to get around to it, but Hulk, well whats up with the Hulk being inculded, his last two movies have hardy set the box office alight, could Hulks presence in the movie be bad for the Avengers?
The Incredible Hulk was only a sort of sequel to the Hulk movie before that.
I guess Robert Downey Jrs Tony Stars appearnce in The Incredible Hulk means that it is undenably part of the "Marvel Movie verse" or whatever its being called.
The Hulk isnt going to be a draw to the movie, and given how the auidence react to movies featuring him, is it too much of a risk, or just a waste of time?
CapAm simply because ive yet to get around to it, but Hulk, well whats up with the Hulk being inculded, his last two movies have hardy set the box office alight, could Hulks presence in the movie be bad for the Avengers?
The Incredible Hulk was only a sort of sequel to the Hulk movie before that.
I guess Robert Downey Jrs Tony Stars appearnce in The Incredible Hulk means that it is undenably part of the "Marvel Movie verse" or whatever its being called.
The Hulk isnt going to be a draw to the movie, and given how the auidence react to movies featuring him, is it too much of a risk, or just a waste of time?
. He's part of the Avengers' DNA, a founder of the original team (though in the late 1990s relaunch it was established that in-universe he wasn't considered an official founder. B*st*rds!) and an excellent opponent/ally for Thor, Iron Man and Cap. He's also one of Marvel's most complex and interesting characters, having once been described as a Rorschach Blot for writers and of course being the only Marvel character to have a successful live-action TV series. Seriously, an Avengers origin movie written by Joss Whedon and with no Hulk? That would be crazy or inspired.