THISPoor FX in the original SW triology, sorry but the space battle in ROTJ, is far superior to the one at the start of ROTS, which looks artifical.
The originals are absolute classics. Some of the finest sci-fi/fantasy films ever made. They hold up spectacularly, and always will, because they are timeless.
The enemy forces might still mow down clones that are the same species as them, or even are them, genetically, but I'll bet it would be an effective psychological weapon.
Whofan said:Clone Storm Troopers were actually not a concept that originated with the prequels. Zahn pretty much started using them in his novels, although the cloning technique used in his trilogy differs considerably.
The "originals" include ROTJ, the first prequel, which gets a pass due to association with its superior predecessors.
or would it just be impossible to watch something with such archaic visual effects after watching something with spectacular visual effects
The "originals" include ROTJ, the first prequel, which gets a pass due to association with its superior predecessors.
i have a couple weeks off soon so i'm pondering what i can look forward to.
ok, here's my situation: i saw the original trilogy when i was a young kid, an age of around, 7 or 8. i can barely remember them or any scenes at all. recently, i've been spending time watching the prequels, and especially, ROTS. with this in mind, is it possible for me to go back and watch the originals with my 'blank slate' after watching the ultra modern and CGI'ed prequels? how do the originals hold up now?
or would it just be impossible to watch something with such archaic visual effects after watching something with spectacular visual effects?
thanks
'The Empire Strikes Back'
By Judith Martin
Washington Post Staff Writer
May 23, 1980
To call "The Empire Strikes Back" a good junk movie is no insult: There is enough bad junk around. And surely we're getting over the snobbery of pretending that it is undemocratic to recognize any hierarchy of culture, as if both low and high can't be appreciated, often be the same people.
But when light entertainment is done well, someone is bound to make extravagant and unsupportable claims for its being great art. You will hear that this sequel to "Star Wars" is part of a vast new mythology, as if it were the Oresteia. Its originator, George Lucas, has revealed that the two pictures are actually parts four and five of a nine-part sage, as if audiences will some day receive the total the way devotees now go to Seattle for a week of immersion in Wagner's complete Ring Cycle.
Nonsense. This is no monumental artistic work, but a science-fiction movie done more snappily than most, including its own predecessor. A chocolate bar is a marvelous sweet that does not need to pretend to be a chocolate soufflé; musical comedies are wonderful entertainment without trying to compete with opera; blue jeans are a perfect garment that shouldn't be compared with haute couture. There are times when you would much rather have a really good hot dog than any steak, but you can still recognize that one is junk food and the other isn't.
"The Empire Strikes Back" has no plot structure, no character studies let alone character development, no emotional or philosophical point to make. It has no original vision of the future, which is depicted as a pastiche of other junk-culture formulae, such as the western, the costume epic and the Would War II movie. Its specialty is "special effects" or visual tricks, some of which are playful, imaginative and impressive, but others of which have become space-movie clichés. But the total effect is fast and attractive and occasionally amusing. Like a good hot dog, that's something of an achievement in a field where unpalatable junk is the rule.
i have a couple weeks off soon so i'm pondering what i can look forward to.
ok, here's my situation: i saw the original trilogy when i was a young kid, an age of around, 7 or 8. i can barely remember them or any scenes at all. recently, i've been spending time watching the prequels, and especially, ROTS. with this in mind, is it possible for me to go back and watch the originals with my 'blank slate' after watching the ultra modern and CGI'ed prequels? how do the originals hold up now?
or would it just be impossible to watch something with such archaic visual effects after watching something with spectacular visual effects?
thanks![]()
ReadyAndWaiting, you need to try a bit more restraint on starting new threads on similar topics. Much of what you're posting really can be covered in existing threads. It isn't necessary to have every little facet have its own thread.
I understand not liking ROTJ, but it was in no way a prequel.
Words have meanings independant of what we want them to mean.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.