Not sure I understand the reasoning behind Kent and Vyxsin not telling the other teams they were going to be assessed a penalty. I would have let other teams know about the time penalty reasoning that knowing that, other teams would then be less likely to use the U-turn.
Not sure I understand the reasoning behind Kent and Vyxsin not telling the other teams they were going to be assessed a penalty. I would have let other teams know about the time penalty reasoning that knowing that, other teams would then be less likely to use the U-turn.
Btw I thought it was also pretty funny that the dad-daughter duo used their get-out-of-jail-free card and still didn't win; well played...
Not sure I understand the reasoning behind Kent and Vyxsin not telling the other teams they were going to be assessed a penalty. I would have let other teams know about the time penalty reasoning that knowing that, other teams would then be less likely to use the U-turn.
People prefer to u-turn teams they think won't be around in the next leg. They don't want a u-turned team to come back and haunt them on later legs.
That means u-turning a team that's in the back of the pack and/or getting ready to serve a long penalty. It's quite possible that the lie saved them from a u-turn.
Yeah, I thought of that a few seasons back when they had that hay bale challenge. I suppose one could argue there's also less incorrect answers as well, but there's probably a lower percentage of correct choices. And if a team ahead knocks out an extra correct choice (say, accidently spilling a cup of tea that was the correct choice), there's even less of a chance.The part I hate about such challenges is that it puts teams at the back of the pack at even more of a disadvantage (as there are fewer right answers as more teams make it through the challenge).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.