• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Are there any SPECIAL EFFECTS that you actually like in TFF?

We swallowed the supernatural thing pretty easily in ST3.

Because it could be rationalized as an alien psionic ability rather than something divine or magical. If you call it "telepathy" or "psionics," give it a Latin or Greek name, then people perceive it as Science even if it's functionally indistinguishable from mysticism.

Good point. If the original idea for STV had been realized, a lot of us would be screaming about a respected science fiction series presenting the Judeo-Christian entities of God and Satan as real, living beings.

Doug
 
Makes me think that Stargate has turned every God there is in human history into aliens, but not the Christian God. Hm...
 
If the original idea for STV had been realized, a lot of us would be screaming about a respected science fiction series presenting the Judeo-Christian entities of God and Satan as real, living beings.

Which would be nothing next to the screams of protest from religious groups if the movie had portrayed God and Satan as the same being. That was what the studio was worried about.
 
Yeah, just like Nimoy demanded to direct Star Trek III in order to return as Spock...

Seriously, all this hatred for Shatner is just amazing, especially since the thread was supposed to be a discussion of the SPFX for TFF.

Nimoy never demanded to direct Star Trek III. He simply suggested/asked after Paramount asked him in what capacity would he liked to be involved in the making of the film and they gave him the greenlight.
 
Yeah, just like Nimoy demanded to direct Star Trek III in order to return as Spock...

Seriously, all this hatred for Shatner is just amazing, especially since the thread was supposed to be a discussion of the SPFX for TFF.

Nimoy never demanded to direct Star Trek III. He simply suggested/asked after Paramount asked him in what capacity would he liked to be involved in the making of the film and they gave him the greenlight.

It always surprises me how readily they agreed to it, given how little experience he had as a director.
 
Yeah, just like Nimoy demanded to direct Star Trek III in order to return as Spock...

Seriously, all this hatred for Shatner is just amazing, especially since the thread was supposed to be a discussion of the SPFX for TFF.

Nimoy never demanded to direct Star Trek III. He simply suggested/asked after Paramount asked him in what capacity would he liked to be involved in the making of the film and they gave him the greenlight.

It always surprises me how readily they agreed to it, given how little experience he had as a director.

Well, he had already watched how it's done countless times, directed three TV episodes himself, he probably had a good plan, and it was at that time the only chance to get the names "Star Trek III" and "Leonard Nimoy" connected. They probably feared that a movie without Nimoy at all would bomb.
 
Well yeah, I assume that was the deal. Given the whole movie was "The Search for Spock", you need Nimoy on board, otherwise it will be a pretty brief search.
 
True. But I could say the same about Avatar's plot. They could've got someone else to write the screenplay and shatner could've just directed. Simples


Well it got nominated for Best Picture, STV didnt.

RAMA

And you seriously think Avatar would have been still nominated with only subpar VFX?

If you think that, then ST Empire Strikes Back, Terminator II, Blade Runner, Minority Report, I, Robot, Matrix, etc ALL should have been nominated for best picture right? It just doesn't work that way.

RAMA
 
And that when there's nothing wrong with the "search for God" idea at all. Indiana Jones was looking for the Holy Grail the same year for crying out loud!

Yeah, it's classic Trek. They find "God", he turns out to be a nasty alien with delusions of grandeur. God knows why Roddenberry hated this film, it's right up his street.

Oh wait, I know. It's because he had no say in it.

Because originally it was the REAL Christian "God". Shatner changed it to an alien because of GR's criticisms, but he thought it diluted his story.....Roddenberry's story dealing with God in the 70s was actually a much better idea. I'd prefer that they all pretty much leave that idea alone.

http://www.well.com/~sjroby/godthing.html

RAMA
 
Well, they're right though. The moment that Star Trek would say "God is fake and is an alien ahh-hole, so suck it Christians!" That would be the permanent end for anything Star Trek, pretty much forever at that point.
 
^ Exactly. That WAS what The God Thing said.

Looks like Gene had no problem with promoting HIS religion (or lack thereof)... :vulcan:

Then again, not even TGT was a threat. Just because an alien says - even thinks - it is God, doesn't mean it actually IS. ;)
 
Because originally it was the REAL Christian "God". Shatner changed it to an alien because of GR's criticisms...

I'm pretty sure it was changed because the studio and the producers were uneasy with the idea of confronting religion directly. Remember, Roddenberry was only an "executive consultant" on the post-TMP films -- which means that he was merely an advisor, not a direct participant in the production, and all he could do was make non-binding suggestions. Of all the people who had influence over shaping the story, Roddenberry was way, way down the list.

As I recall, pretty much everyone involved with the production was telling Shatner that it was a bad idea to do a story about God. If it actually were God, it would be way too controversial, so it would have to be a fake "God" and there'd be no real payoff. But Shatner stuck to his guns and they had to try to make it work. Which it didn't.
 
The silly thing is that they didn't go through the library of stock shots from the previous films to help beef up the anemic effects they had. There are a number of flyby shots of the E from TMP that would have worked (and are blurry enough where you wouldn't notice the missing -A), and several of the TSFS Klingon BOP effects could have been flopped and reused.
 
They still reused some shots, though, like the Enterprise-A in spacedock from the previous movie. Or is that really the only reused shot in the movie? It has been a while since I've seen it...
 
Yeah, just like Nimoy demanded to direct Star Trek III in order to return as Spock...

Seriously, all this hatred for Shatner is just amazing, especially since the thread was supposed to be a discussion of the SPFX for TFF.

Nimoy never demanded to direct Star Trek III. He simply suggested/asked after Paramount asked him in what capacity would he liked to be involved in the making of the film and they gave him the greenlight.

It always surprises me how readily they agreed to it, given how little experience he had as a director.

I think that Paramount had a really good working relationship with Nimoy. He was always a professional and gentlemen so I can see their willingness to give him a try and like someone said they most likely didn't want to go ahead with another film without him.
 
Because originally it was the REAL Christian "God". Shatner changed it to an alien because of GR's criticisms, but he thought it diluted his story.....Roddenberry's story dealing with God in the 70s was actually a much better idea. I'd prefer that they all pretty much leave that idea alone.

http://www.well.com/~sjroby/godthing.html

RAMA

I seriously doubt that Shatner conceived of it as the "Christian" God...

Doug
 
^Well, Jews, Christians, and Muslims all worship the same God, they just differ on the details.

My point was that Shatner is not a Christian, so why would he think to have a "Christian" god in the movie?

Which reminds me: Shatner was interviewed in Parade a month or so back, and I guffawed when I read a question from the interviewer: "Do you go to church on Sundays?" Shatner was very gracious, and just responded something about not going to any organized house of worship.

Doug
 
My point was that Shatner is not a Christian, so why would he think to have a "Christian" god in the movie?

I know what you intended, but my point is that it's an inaccurate choice of words to talk about the "Christian god" as if it's somehow a different entity from the "Jewish god." They're the same deity. There's just some disagreement over the specifics.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top