Pretty much describes my 35 year relationship with Star Trek.

And trust me I've seen alot that's been mishandled!
I think we ALL have. It's one of the things that unites us as Trek fans: we gripe.

But seriously, pointing out the flaws, logic gaps, etc. IS part of the whole experience, really.
Still waiting for Anwar to answer Guy Gardeners question about the Borg never seeing a knife (or bullets for that matter) prior to Star Trek: First Contact.
He can't answer it because there is no good answer.
If the Borg could adapt to "concepts", they would have LONG since become
completely invulnerable to all of the Ent-D's weapons before even "Q Who?". The Borg have already assimilated thousands of species by then. There is NO POSSIBILITY that they would not, during all those centuries of fighting, subduing, and assimilating other species, have encountered scores of weapons - energy, explosive, kinetic, melee. If they could adapt to concepts, NOTHING would have been able to hurt them at all in the slightest even once throughout the entirety of the Star Trek time frame.
Infantry maybe (and that makes sense, the personal shields of a Borg Drone can't be as strong as the Ships' shields),
Having different aspects of the Borg collective have shields with different levels of pure strength is incompatible with the (insane) notion that the Borg adapt to "concepts and ideas", and not simply to a specific form of damage.
but ship-wise they were impervious to all of the ENT-D's weapons except one phaser that lasted two seconds before it too became useless. All intents and purposes, invulnerable to the entire CONCEPT of phasers and torpedoes, for every episode of TNG they were in after "Q Who?"
No. You are wrong. I'm not going to waste time writing an essay about why you are wrong, because it's blindingly obvious. No one on the Trek creative team ever intended for the Borg to adapt to concepts. No single Borg ep or movie presents even a single shred of evidence that the Borg adapt to concepts. The fandom as a whole never believed that the Borg adapt to concepts. I have NEVER encountered this idea in any way, shape, or form until right now, in this thread, from
Anwar. You are
wrong.
As for the rest... Alright, I'm gonna do this huge, detailed rebuttal thing
once. No more responses on these points from me after this. This is ridiculous. (Yes, I know, I'm feeding the ridiculousness by responding, but I can't help myself; I still find this all somehow entertaining.

)
The ENT-D's weapons were adapted to within minutes of their first battle with the Borg in "Q Who?" and aside from one random phaser frequency in BOBW they remained useless. The battle in FC went on for hours yet the Borg never adapted to their weapons the entire time? Every shot and torpedo hit caused damage.
There is one very visible shot during the FC battle of an Akira class firing a phaser beam into the cube; there are NO visual effects for the impact. The ship just eats the beam. So it wasn't "every shot."
Beyond that, I would point out that in "Q Who?", many of the later torpedo shots that did "nothing" (as in, the dialog made it clear that zero damage was done) still hit the cube with a visual "explosion" special effect. So to assume that every shot that hits the cube in FC that has an explosion effect MUST be doing real damage is silly. The implication in in "Q Who?" and BoBW was that some shots were completely nullified, but some did SOME small amount of damage, but it was such a
tiny amount, that compared to the Borg's regenerative capability, it was irrelevant.

Ergo, "doing damage" isn't the issue. Doing damage that MATTERS is the issue. And nothing in FC goes against that concept: given that this huge fleet has been fighting the Borg for HOURS and still has only succeeded in doing moderate damage, it holds with "Q Who?" and BoBW.
Furthermore, this WAS an entire fleet, hand-picked to fight off the Borg. They DID allude to developing new "anti-Borg" weapons during BoBW (and the
Defiant herself was conceived as such). So it stands to reason that even the standard "phasers and photons" weapons being fired during FC are NOT exactly the same, functionally, as the Ent-D's weapons: they are both more powerful and specifically tailored to be harder for the Borg to adapt to. They WOULD eventually adapt, but if these new weapons are able to more rapidly adjust to new frequencies, and for longer, it would mean that - with an entire fleet firing - the Borg wouldn't COMPLETELY adapt to the Starfleet weapons for quite some time (possibly not until long after the scene where the Ent-E arrived, had the Ent-E NOT arrived and the battle continued as it had been). Plus, while the fleet was doing a hell of a lot better than in BoBW, they weren't
winning. Picard's link to the Borg proved vital to destroying the cube without taking even heavier losses than they already had. The "weak spot" seemed to me to represent a section that had LOST its adaptive shields. What the Borg were doing at that moment was trying to cover it up so that Starfleet wouldn't detect it - and they succeeded; none of the Starfleet ships could detect the massive gap in the Borg's defenses. Picard "heard" them discussing this gap, and thus was able to have the fleet target the gap, possibly hitting a vital and/or highly volatile internal component directly. The ability to adapt or not didn't matter in that instance, because the shields covering that area had collapsed, which is what MADE it a weak spot, and why Picard targeted it.
This isn't JUST my idea, by the way: the FC novelization suggests all of this, if memory serves.
In BoBW, that cube adapted to the weapons of the Ent-D. The weapons being fired by the FC fleet are better, and slightly different. And no, they would not be useless due to the Borg having adapted to the concept of phasers/torps because the Borg DON'T DO THAT.
Furthermore (again), it also stands to reason that Voyager - given it's launch date - would have up-to-date weapons. Thus, they could defend themselves against a Borg ship effectively FAR longer than the Ent-D in 2366 could.
This is why I've never said that Voyager shouldn't be able to even DAMAGE Borg ships with their standard weapons. Just that they shouldn't be able to easily beat them. My own analysis above indicates that Voyager should do BETTER in straight combat than the Ent-D of 2366-67 did, so I have no problem with that. But "able to put up a fight" and "beating the Borg easily" are two different things.
And besides, my main complaint about the Borg on Voyager has always been an ATTITUDE, a sort of "Borg? Oh yeah, so we might have to fight the Borg. Ok, whatever." feel, that works for lesser villains but not for Borg.
Whew!
That story-telling-wise, when dealing with writing a Borg episode, you cannot even use an idea more than once without "ruining" or "emasculating" the Borg. Once you use one "Hack" story, you can't do any more regardless of how different they might be. Once you use a "Natural Phenomena" story, you can't use any others no matter how different they might be.
False. This has nothing to do with how the Borg were conceived, how they were depicted on screen, or sound writing practice in general.
That's how overpowered and overblown the TNG fan's opinions of the Borg were.
Nobody believes this but you.