^ I agree. One of my best friends has called me Jack (his nickname for me) since shortly after we met many years ago (and not for any teasing reason). He still calls me Jack, and so does his wife, as she learned it from him once they started dating.
You've essentially nailed it. At the time of "What Are Little Girls Made Of" Kirk is the only one who calls him Sam. But if Kirk only refers to his brother as Sam when he speaks of him then why would McCoy refer to him as anything else for no reason?The mistake was not anywhere in this dialog. Reread my post in its entirety. The mistake was perpetrated by the writer of "Operation Annihilate" when they didn't pay attention to the line "Only you call him Sam."(emphasis mine) As for your dozens of reasons, I cite Occam's Razor and claim it was a younger brother's teasing that gave George the nickname 'Sam,' as only Jim used the name.
So when he's sitting around sipping a Saurian Brandy with McCoy, telling stories about the family he's from, how does he identify his brother?
And if Kirk calls him 'Sam', why would McCoy know any difference?
I said the above because that was the intent of the original dialog.
TAS is not canon, but that doesn't mean that some canon material (DS9, ENT, STVI) can't make oblique references to it.
TAS is not canon, but that doesn't mean that some canon material (DS9, ENT, STVI) can't make oblique references to it.
TAS is not canon, but that doesn't mean that some canon material (DS9, ENT, STVI) can't make oblique references to it.
What are some, if you know of any off the top of your head? I've never watched TAS, so I'm rather clueless about it.
TAS is not canon, but that doesn't mean that some canon material (DS9, ENT, STVI) can't make oblique references to it.
What are some, if you know of any off the top of your head? I've never watched TAS, so I'm rather clueless about it.
^^ You're being ridiculous. In all the time Kirk and McCoy know each other and are establishing a friendship Kirk likely referred to his brother and called him Sam (as he is wont to do) and so McCoy would naturally follow suit. I've seen this happen in real life often where we refer to someone by name that we've heard used and then found out later that it wasn't the proper name.
I gotta agree with Warped here. His opinion embraces something that would happen in real life, whereas you are making a literal interpretation of the events in those episodes.. Of course taken literally you would be correct, but real life isn't like that. Warped's statement would clearly be a more true and more realistic. The fact that it goes unstated is arbitrary. Clearly Bones and Jim are good friends and there's no reason to think that Bones wouldn't call Kirk's brother Sam. That characterization should need the spoonfed explanation that you apparently require.^^ You're being ridiculous. In all the time Kirk and McCoy know each other and are establishing a friendship Kirk likely referred to his brother and called him Sam (as he is wont to do) and so McCoy would naturally follow suit. I've seen this happen in real life often where we refer to someone by name that we've heard used and then found out later that it wasn't the proper name.
If McCoy had heard Kirk call his brother Sam, he would have asked why he was doing so, when, once again, only Jim calls him Sam. If Kirk says, "Oh, that's just my nickname for him." McCoy is not going to use the name. Despite BillJ's facetious retort about Robert Bloch's intentions regarding the audience interpretation of the dialog, if only Jim calls him Sam, only Jim calls him Sam. Therefore, as I've said too many times in this thread to justify your continued denials, the writer of "Operation Annihilate" screwed up, and had McCoy call Kirk's brother by the wrong name.
Kirk's brother's name was George Samuel Kirk. Calling him Sam isn't at all a stretch. It isn't a nickname pulled out of thin air, but a short form of his real middle name.
To be honest, I'm truly amazed that this has never occurred to you. Everyone I've discussed this with IRL has gotten it easily. And don't accuse me of mindreading, I said the above because that was the intent of the original dialog.
Despite BillJ's facetious retort about Robert Bloch's intentions regarding the audience interpretation of the dialog, if only Jim calls him Sam, only Jim calls him Sam.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.