And then her acidic blood burns through the hull, depressurizing the ship and killing everyone?
The full director's cut of Aliens is about as intelligent a big action film as you're going to get, and I mean that as a compliment. That "lovey dovey" stuff in Aliens is not lame. It's hard-won, at great expense, cost of life, and personal trauma through the course of the story. Aliens is one film that works for its "happy ending" and doesn't feel saccharine as the credits roll.
While Alien3 has some fascinating elements and half a bag of good ideas, no version of the film is a complete movie, or a polished story. It doesn't have the zen garden perfection of Alien's minimalism and patient horror. It can't match the industrialized action or frentic terror of Aliens. And no matter what anyone thinks of Aliens, it was a terrible move and a betrayal of the story to kill Hicks and Newt off-camera before the movie even begins.
Alien3 was the first movie I'd ever seen where a noticeable number of people disavow that it's canonical - that it really follows Aliens. And I hate to say it, but I have to agree; it is such a mess and it betrays far too much of the story, that it is a worse than useless sequel - it hurts the film that precedes it.
Yes the Alien series is survivalist but that means people SURVIVE! And Ripley and co have all more earned that right, not to be arbitarily killed off by some director who didn't give a damn about the series and just wanted to make an appalling slasher if in space.
Personally I've known plenty of soldiers like Hudson, he's a very beliveable and well rounded character, you can't expect everyone to be stoical in the face of such an extreme situation, it wouldn't be realistic if he was as calm as Hicks and Vasquez.
I think what makes James Cameron such a great director is that he can combine many different themes, he writes great action, great suspense, hugely imaginative technology, great characters and dialogue, a feminist sensibility and humour
Ripley's family is all good to me! Out of 200 colonists and 15 members of the rescue party there are 4 survivors? One of whom is horribly scarred and one of whom is ripped in half? Hardly Disney?
To say that every film that doesn't end like the original Night of the Living Dead is invalid is nonsense. Cameron's vision is much more in keeping with Scott's than Fincher's, in fact Alien3 is the ONLY film in the series with a 'stupid, nihilistic, slasher pic in space' quality
Hey, just because Aliens is intelligent doesn't mean it can't have a rousing, heartpumping punch the air moment!
(interestingly people did the same in the limo off the bridge scene in True Lies)
People don't want to accept Alien 3 as canonical because it ruins their enjoyment of the first 2 wonderful films, makes them pointless.
The 'it's all a dream' theory isn't actually that far fetched, it explained the confused and sometimes nonsensical nature of 3 and 4. Also the last lines of Aliens is Newt asking Ripley can they dream on the way home and she tells her they both can (beautiful scene, smiling just thinking of it).
This fanfic probably says it better than I ever could;
http://movies.adultfanfiction.net/story.php?no=544177708
(written by the Googlecaptain who writes happy endings to all films/TV/dark fanfic ever, he/she is the Captain Kirk in the Kubyashu-Maru of the fanfic world, won't accept a no win scenario)
Michael Jan Friedman's Aliens novel, Original Sin (which picks up after Alien: Resurrection, a period that Dark Horse has left untouched), is as close to a Firefly novel as you'll get.Alien4; Ripley, Call and the rest of the pirates land on Earth and presumably go off to become Firefly style adventurers with Ripley as a female Mal Reynolds
I liked "Alien", LOVED "Aliens" but I like to pretend that "Alien 3" doesn't even exist in the "Aliens continuity". I saw it once in the theater when it came out, hated it, and have never seen it again- nor did I see the next sequel movie either. After everything that they went through in "Aliens" to get off LV426, particularly at the end, the decision of the directors to simply kill off Newt, Hicks, Bishop, and, ultimately Ripley herself- all within the space of this movie is utterly unforgivable. Why they thought that THIS was the right way for the storyline to go escapes me plus the way that they got there, specifically explaining that the Queen Mother Alien supposedly laid an egg on the ship before she died wasn't even foreshadowed- retconning it to fit the storyline needs of "Alien 3". Any egg that might have got laid on the ship in the cargo hold should've conceivably been blown out into space when the Queen Mother was.
![]()
I like to think Ripley and co returned to Acheron to solve the mystery of the derelict then after a few years of Firefly style adventures she and Call make their fortune, get married and start an orphanage.
I like to think Ripley and co returned to Acheron to solve the mystery of the derelict then after a few years of Firefly style adventures she and Call make their fortune, get married and start an orphanage.
What a lame, lame, LAME story that would've been. Alien is not Star Wars.
Also "it hurts the film that precedes it" is also just daft. Nothing can damage something that precedes it. It can be lousy in its own right but it can't go back in time and change a previous film, in the same way that the AvP films are an abomination but do nothing to harm Alien.
I disagree. I think that a bad sequel can hurt the movie that came before it.
Also "it hurts the film that precedes it" is also just daft. Nothing can damage something that precedes it. It can be lousy in its own right but it can't go back in time and change a previous film, in the same way that the AvP films are an abomination but do nothing to harm Alien.
I disagree. I think that a bad sequel can hurt the movie that came before it.
Nah, Alien 3's ending is still brilliant even though they brought her back to life in Alien Resurrection.![]()
Nah, that's lame. Death is a GREAT ending to her character, it defies convention which is a major part of the Alien series. No one expected Captain Dallas to be killed off so quickly in "Alien", and no one expected them to so heartlessly (and REALISTICALLY) kill off characters in A3 including Ripley. It's what makes the movies so good.
Nah, that's lame. Death is a GREAT ending to her character, it defies convention which is a major part of the Alien series. No one expected Captain Dallas to be killed off so quickly in "Alien", and no one expected them to so heartlessly (and REALISTICALLY) kill off characters in A3 including Ripley. It's what makes the movies so good.
To be honest, no one expected Alien to be a franchise. It just ended up developing into one when James Cameron was looking for something to do.No one expected them to take a great franchise like alien and take a diherrea dump all over it when they made the third installment, but they did... It's what makes it so very, very ass.
Brilliant and cliche are not the same thing. Aliens was a cliche-storm. Alien 3 was complete un-cliche. See how that works?![]()
I disagree. I think that a bad sequel can hurt the movie that came before it.
Nah, Alien 3's ending is still brilliant even though they brought her back to life in Alien Resurrection.![]()
Brilliant and complete shit are not the same thing. Aliens was brilliant. Alien 3 was completE shit. See how that works?![]()
Glad they brought her back in part 4 and who knows, maybe Hicks and Newt were cloned too and they escaped the ship when the bugs broke loose?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.