The entire FLEET wasn't wiped out by Nero.
In TOS, Kirk was an Ensign while still at the academy. We know this because Captain Garrovick was his CO "from the day [he] left the academy", and Garrovick commanded the Farragut, where Kirk was a lieutenant.
Best idea I read in a while! They definitely should address this as a plot thread in the sequel.I see a plot thread in the sequel where Kirk is wondering whether he actually deserves his command. Some might say that he got promoted through politics. ie the Federation wanted their poster boy hero to get his own ship and thus he got it.
Either that, or have Kirk being confronted with the dissatisfaction of other command-track Starfleet officers over his quick promotion, even having it come up at a very inconvenient time during the mission -- "resentment rearing its ugly head"-type situation. Could be a huge test for Kirk to pass while at the same time keeping his eye on accomplishing the assigned mission.Best idea I read in a while! They definitely should address this as a plot thread in the sequel.I see a plot thread in the sequel where Kirk is wondering whether he actually deserves his command. Some might say that he got promoted through politics. ie the Federation wanted their poster boy hero to get his own ship and thus he got it.
Nonsense. Even setting aside the question of other officers elsewhere, the fact is that Spock deserved the promotion more than Kirk... yet, apparently, got no reward at all. After all...Not if he's the only one of all your officers whose orders saved the planet. Most of them were safe in the Laurentian System -- or trying their damndest to get there, against Kirk's advice. None of them deserve the command more than Kirk.Re: Problem with Kirk's immediate promotion to Captain
Indeed. And without the assistance of Spock (who, BTW, seemed awfully fit for duty immediately after declaring himself unfit)... not to mention a helluva lot of convenient coincidences... Kirk's "plan" would have failed. Miserably. Costing the lives of everyone on the Enterprise, and Earth as well. After all, what was his plan beyond "let's go back and fight the unbeatable bad guy single-handedly?"Spock could have stopped Nero all by himself, without any of the "contributions" of Kirk: he removed Nero's stores of red matter, he destroyed the drill that threatened Earth, he eventually destroyed Nero's ship. All Kirk did was save Pike's life; his antics onboard the Narada didn't even add up to distracting Nero on a critical moment.
QFT.He deserves a promotion, a commendation, and a medal. Promotion to captain is not a necessary step to reward him for his efforts. It was a childishly convenient way to set up the characters for their traditional roles on the Enterprise by the end of the film. It was daft.
And, perhaps a bit more importantly, without Spock's planning, piloting, and tactical ability.We and everything else living on the planet would be dead without Kirk's drive.
Absolutely right.A simple "four years later" at the end of the movie would have gone a long way to get rid of this discrepancy.
Kirk deserves a captaincy, that much we know. But not so damned soon.
Well, that's awfully damned convenient for the writers, isn't it? "We want the universe to be different, so we're not tied down... except when we want to keep it the same or excuse some outrageous coincidence, then we can say the universe is 'meant' to be that way."Isn't there an element in ST:XI's premise of the universe trying to 'correct' itself? The timeline branched off in a weird way and so the universe is performing equally strange acrobatics of fate to return to where it's supposed to be.
I think I heard that concept stated in an interview with the writers or something...I can't remember precisely where.
Why do you keep saying this, in the face of all contrary evidence?What's inconceivable is that any one of them deserves it more than he does. There are others who could do the job; but as I said, they can all get in line behind Kirk.But that's the thing. It's inconceivable that there is literally no one else in Starfleet who deserves the captaincy of Enterprise. Starfleet must have hundreds of thousands of officers, and it is unthinkable that none of those are competent.
Well, no. Wrong in at least two ways. First of all,Saving the planet is the ultimate priority; they should have been nowhere else.
...and second, as has also been pointed out, in the long history of Trek we've seen countless Starfleet officers heroically save countless planets, including Earth, without getting wildly unprecedented promotions like this....It's arrogant to assume that Earth is more important than the rest of the Federation.
Not wrong and not arrogant; Nero intended to destroy all the Federation planets, and Starfleet should have been at each one of them in turn.Well, no. Wrong in at least two ways. First of all,Saving the planet is the ultimate priority; they should have been nowhere else.
...It's arrogant to assume that Earth is more important than the rest of the Federation.
Not countless; and not lieutenants. They're already at the rank where they're responsible for whole sectors; i.e., doing their job. To repeat: none of the officers of captain rank did more than Kirk to deserve it; and they can all get in line behind him....and second, as has also been pointed out, in the long history of Trek we've seen countless Starfleet officers heroically save countless planets, including Earth, without getting wildly unprecedented promotions like this.
Not wrong and not arrogant; Nero intended to destroy all the Federation planets, and Starfleet should have been at each one of them in turn.
Not wrong and not arrogant; Nero intended to destroy all the Federation planets, and Starfleet should have been at each one of them in turn.
Only the audience knows Nero's intentions and motivations.
Spock knows and still plans to escape to the Laurentian. The point is, it is not arrogant to expect the fleet to protect Earth when it's the one under attack. They should have done so for any of them.Only the audience knows Nero's intentions and motivations...
And he was captain of the flagship.However, I will concede that there were plenty of TOS episodes where Kirk used ill-chosen, under-manned landing parties. That doesn't make it right![]()
Either that, or have Kirk being confronted with the dissatisfaction of other command-track Starfleet officers over his quick promotion, even having it come up at a very inconvenient time during the mission -- "resentment rearing its ugly head"-type situation. Could be a huge test for Kirk to pass while at the same time keeping his eye on accomplishing the assigned mission.Best idea I read in a while! They definitely should address this as a plot thread in the sequel.I see a plot thread in the sequel where Kirk is wondering whether he actually deserves his command. Some might say that he got promoted through politics. ie the Federation wanted their poster boy hero to get his own ship and thus he got it.
He deserves a promotion, a commendation, and a medal. Promotion to captain is not a necessary step to reward him for his efforts. It was a childishly convenient way to set up the characters for their traditional roles on the Enterprise by the end of the film. It was daft.
Spock knows and still plans to escape to the Laurentian. The point is, it is not arrogant to expect the fleet to protect Earth when it's the one under attack. They should have done so for any of them.Only the audience knows Nero's intentions and motivations...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.