• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Peter Jackson Flic “Lovely Bones” Leaked

How is this news?... It happens to every film. (sooner or later)
The film has been out for a while now. (even though it has yet to go to wide release)
 
Though it hasn't been released in my area yet, hasn't it bee in release for several weeks? I know most of the major reviewers have already seen and evaluated it.
 
Though it hasn't been released in my area yet, hasn't it bee in release for several weeks? I know most of the major reviewers have already seen and evaluated it.

The Lovely Bones is currently being shown in 3 theaters right now according to boxofficemojo. The movie won't get a wide release until January 15.
 
Since there sending ocsar screeners may be they had a limited release (in 3 theaters) in December to qualify for this years consideration. I believe films realased after the end of 2009 can not be considered for the adademy awards this March.
 
A co-worker just burned a DVD of it for me...going to check it out later tonight, despite the 40% fresh rating at RT...
 
^^^will do. Haven't read the book yet, so my opinion won't be coloured by "how close" or "how far" from the book the movie is.
 
A co-worker just burned a DVD of it for me...going to check it out later tonight, despite the 40% fresh rating at RT...

Tell us if you liked it or not.


I saw a screening of it a few weeks ago--I put a review up in TV/Media...

...I didn't care for it. It felt all so precious to me, with an overuse of voice overs. Stanley Tucci, however, is great.

I'm unfamiliar with the book, so, I don't know how closely it follows it.

In the end, I was disappointed.
 
I must agree with Professor Zoom.

The Lovely Bones was a beautifully made film, with gorgeous special effects and some decent performances, especially by Stanley Tucci. However, the film comes off as overwrought, contrived, and forced. There are some truly fantastic moments -- like when Jack Salmon (Mark Walhberg) realizes George Harvey (Tucci) is the killer of his daughter -- but the film is strangely overly sentimental, lacking a certain emotional authenticity that comes with grief and loss. Everything is overblown, and there is no room for any emotional nuisance.

The film works surprisingly a lot better when it is trying to be a taut suspense thriller rather than when it is trying to be a heart-wrenching drama. The scene where Lindsay breaks into Mr. Harvey's room was well-staged and well-edited. Peter Jackson certainly knows how to build suspense. If only he handled the heavy-handed emotional material with a bit more ease. For a film with such delicate subject material, nothing is subtle or quiet.

Overall, The Lovely Bones is a disappointment. I'm an ardent fan of the book, which was so much better at relaying the emotional intricacy of loss. Naturally some of the details got lost in translation, and I think that's my biggest problem with The Lovely Bones: loss is all about the little details, the little moments, and that is something the film sorely misses.
 
Downloaded the screener. I enjoyed it, although some of of the tonal shifts were a little jarring. In the latter part of the film the "real world" and "dreamscape" threads seemed to diverge thematically as well as from a narratively, the resulting message being somewhat confused. In many ways it reminded me of The Fountain.

The CGI dreamscapes were for the most part very effective and occasionally beautiful, my favourite such scene being the ships in the bottles coming onto the rocks, inter-cut with the father destroying his collection in grief. I'll likely pick it up on Blu-Ray when it comes around.
 
I wonder what the reaction would be if I went online and told the community I stole pretty much anything other than a movie or music.
 
I wonder what the reaction would be if I went online and told the community I stole pretty much anything other than a movie or music.
Confusion?

It's a lot easier to steal movies and music than it is to steal, say, furniture.
 
I must say I am a bit disturbed by the open piracy admission in this thread as well.

I hope you pay for it (by seeing it or renting it) somewhere down the line. Otherwise, if you didn't really have an interest, why download it? If you weren't sure to begin with, read the reviews like the rest of us.

Kegg - Just because it is easier doesn't make ir right.
 
I hope you pay for it (by seeing it or renting it) somewhere down the line.

As I said, I'll probably pick it up on Blu-Ray. Not because I saw it, but because it was a good film. Blu-Ray because it was a good, shiny film. ;)

Otherwise, if you didn't really have an interest, why download it?

Because vague interest doesn't translate to payment when funds are limited and vague interests abound. I have a respectable DVD/Blu-Ray collection, and most of the films in that collection I originally saw illegally, or via some other free method. Lacking such methods I would certainly have spent far less money on such things over the last decade than I actually have.

If you weren't sure to begin with, read the reviews like the rest of us.

In this case I think I'm glad I didn't. I seem to have enjoyed it more than most critics. :lol:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top