With insurance it is not a coerced helping of someone else who will not or cannot pay for anything. You will then bring up that there are people who would pay for insurance but can't because of pre-existing conditions. Well if I can do it then there must be a way others can do it. The only time (and I'm not saying that this is the only times) I've heard about pre-existing conditons causing you to be denied is life insurance and I have run into that. I've yet to hear, at least all the times I've gotten health insurance, that I will be denied because of my pre-existing condition.
For most of your life you have been one form of public assistance or another concerning your health issues. (or so you told us)
You've had the good luck to get insurance when you started to work.
But, conveniently, you are leaving out of this discussion that you, now that you are not working, you youself do not have health insurance of your own. You rely solely on the employer-base health insurance of your wife. And to top that off, your wife isn't even paying for it; her employer (and in turn all her co-workers) is, out of his good will I guess, paying for it.
You've got lucky. Very much so.
But there are millions in your country who aren't as lucky.
They, for the good of the whole society, rely upon the help of the society as a whole, because your entirely market-driven system is crushing them.
But perhaps you and
TLS, who (how did he put it?)
'doesn't feel the need to respond to a person such as [myself]', feel that your country is too stupid, too incompetent to accomplish what a great many nations managed: to ensure the wellbeing, 'the general wellfare' of their citizens.
I don't care if you call a afordable public health insurance 'socialism'; all governmental, tax-financed programmes are socialist anyway.
BTW: Just as a nice historical anecdote, Reichskanzler Bismarck instituted the first public health insurance in the late 19th century in Germany as a way to take away political and societal power from the Socialist.