Zach-why feed his fire with so much attention? Ignore him. Don't quote him, don't respond. And for your own sake-calm down. Getting that pissed can't be good for your blood pressure!![]()
How come we never find someone who says " I believe in aliens visiting the Earth, Bigfoot and the Loch Ness monster and ESP, but life after death? No...I'm not convinced on that one."
It seems like some people want the universe to be,well, a lot more like a TV show than it really is.
I have a bad habit of considering all of a person's posts in a thread, not just their latest bit of vitriol and self-denial./facepalm
The point of Zacahary's post was that he doesn't believe %100 in these things, he just finds them an interesting subject of discourse and does not rule them out completely. I have a similar view in regards to the paranormal.
In fact your entire post seems to bear little resemblance to any actual ideas presented in the post prior, it's like you are responding to something else entirely ...
How come we never find someone who says " I believe in aliens visiting the Earth, Bigfoot and the Loch Ness monster and ESP, but life after death? No...I'm not convinced on that one."
It seems like some people want the universe to be,well, a lot more like a TV show than it really is.
* shrugs *
I believe more strongly in the possibility of ghosts at present than I do in things like UFOs or cryptozoology. I believe there is more immediate evidence to be evaluated for them, and there is also the potential advantage (assuming for the sake of argument that a lot of traditional ghost lore is true) that hauntings are often repetitive events, a sort of echo caused by something. You can go to a location and have a decent idea of what to look for, instead of only having to evaluate the evidence long after the incident took place.
Does that mean I'm less skeptical of ghosts? No. There are plenty of instances where people have been mistaken, or have explained things in supernatural terms because that was the prevailing belief system at the time. There are other cases where people just made shit up to get attention. But beyond that, there are many cases that have been reported for decades or even centuries, and there is the fact that virtually every culture that has ever existed has had very similar ideas about what ghosts are and why they might exist. There's a layer of consistency there that is valuable for seeing whether there's any empirical evidence for ghosts.
And even if we should find that form of solid evidence, it would only answer some of our questions. I don't know whether an authentic ghost is really the remnants of a sentient being or just a sort of an echo of one; the potential evidence suggests that either of those options is possible. The metaphysical questions are a lot harder to answer, but I think it is a very interesting subject.
I have a bad habit of considering all of a person's posts in a thread, not just their latest bit of vitriol and self-denial./facepalm
The point of Zacahary's post was that he doesn't believe %100 in these things, he just finds them an interesting subject of discourse and does not rule them out completely. I have a similar view in regards to the paranormal.
In fact your entire post seems to bear little resemblance to any actual ideas presented in the post prior, it's like you are responding to something else entirely ...
He's made it clear in several posts that he's a hardcore believer, even if he's now "limited" that belief to such minor, inconsequential percentages. Just to, you know, prove to all the "skeptics" that he's actually a skeptic, too. If you wanna buy that, so be it.
Nut jobs are nut jobs, period. They're really easy to spot. When someone -- anyone -- doesn't believe whatever hoodoo they believe, they're an uneducated buffoon too young or mentally retarded to understand all the blatant, unquestionable proof that's Out There(tm). Just look at how he's presenting himself as some kind of supergenius extraordinaire right now (complete with Wile E. Coyote's finger waving for emphasis).
Some people don't deserve respect in my opinion. Nut jobs are one of 'em.
I cannot resist a quiz like this. My own answers below:Yes, but Zach -- do you believe in the following?:
1. The Tooth Fairy
2. Santa Claus
3. Gremlins
4. Demons
5. Angels
6. The Mothman
7. The Ogopogo Monster
8. The Firebird
9. El Chupacabra
10. Ghosts
11. Pixies
12. Banshees
13. Leprechans
14. Vampires
15. Werewolves
If I think of something else, I'll let you know...
![]()
Of course I am sure this confession sets ME up for all kinds of scorn and ridicule by the so called "educated, sophisticated and enlightened ones" on this forum.
Well, so be it...![]()
Of course I am sure this confession sets ME up for all kinds of scorn and ridicule by the so called "educated, sophisticated and enlightened ones" on this forum.
Well, so be it...![]()
Nah.
The "scorn" is coming from the crazies who go on about blackened text and all the other bullshit "proof that isn't proof but it is THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE GO EDUCATE YOURSELF" nutjobs.
I'm personally a believer in alien life (though not the regular-visitors-who've-been-coming-here-like-all-the-time-to-kill-our-cattle-and-shove-phallic-objects-up-our-totally-homophobic-asses-but-the-goverment-is-covering-it-up-by-blacking-everything-out-OMG variety) as well as a lot of other supernatural things.
Course, the nutjobs don't care about that. In fact, they never once even assumed one could doubt their undeniable proof while still believing in something. The fanaticism goes that far. Not only do you have to believe, but you have to believe just like them. You'll also note they're the only ones going around touting their own "education, sophistication and enlightment." Just because I, personally, think someone is mentally and/or socially ill, that doesn't make them stupid.
Absolutely nothing wrong with believing in things. But there's shit seriously wrong with the conspiracy freaks. As pointed out by practically every single foaming-at-the-mouth post in this thread alone. Hell, it's almost as entertaining as watching FOX news.
Yeah man, THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE GUYS! EDUCATE YOURSELF! OMG! Aliens and sasquatches are among us! We... uh, kinda sorta have proof of a lack of proof, so, yeah! TAKE THAT SKEPTIC GUYS! Nevermind, again, the invisibile domes surrounding Bigfoot's house or the instantly evaporting dung and stuff. Or, like, the fact that aliens have some super power science thing that destroys a camera's ability to focus. That's not the kind of proof we go by! We only adhere to a LACK of a LACK of proof! Double negatives! That's our gig! THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE! DON'T BELIEVE ME! QUIT BEING A DUMB OLD POOPYHEAD SKEPTIC AND GO EDUCATE YOURSELF! OMG OMG OMG!
No way. Blackened text = aliens. You've convinced me completely. There's no other explanation. NONE. Flat out PROOF that can NOT be denied. If it's blacked out, it has to be an alien conspiracy.
In fact, with a quick search on Google, I've found TONS of alien proof!
http://thenonist.com/images/par.jpg
http://gigaom.files.wordpress.com/2007/04/vz2.JPG
http://bailoutsleuth.com/ui/pwcc1.png
What's even worse is that I have found UNDENIABLE PROOF that they're even using forums/instant messengers to plot and scheme their evil alien plans.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2604/3718094517_7e39558765.jpg
And here's proof that they use Google in regards to their medical concerns!
http://blogoscoped.com/files/google-health/11.png
THEY'RE EVERYWHERE! Quick! Someone hook me up with a tinfoil hat!!!
Man, aliens are just so super awesomely smart. They can convince anyone and everyone to black out text relating to them (because, naturally, any blackened out text = aliens no matter what), and they have Super Science(tm!) technology that lets them get photographed ALL the time, but it makes it so that every single photo is always blurry! Even if it's taken with bad ass cameras in this high definition age where practically everyone has a self-focusing high quality camera in their pocket.
Aliens are real.
This all proves it.
Santa Claus?
Well, I might quibble on this one.
You see Santa Claus in French is Pere Noel (translated: Father Christmas). I'm French Canadian. It just so happens that my father was born on December 25th and my grandfather named him...Noel.
And so for me Pere Noel has always been very real. And in his senior years he has developed just a bit of a roundness about the middle and he stands only 5'-4". He also has a beard that's going whitish grey.
On the downside his laugh is nothing like Ho-ho-ho although it's quite loud. And he can swear a blue streak if his beloved Montreal Canadiens play lousy and particularly if they lose to the hated Toronto Maple Leafs.
All things considered, weellll...![]()
I cannot resist a quiz like this. My own answers below:Yes, but Zach -- do you believe in the following?:
1. The Tooth Fairy
2. Santa Claus
3. Gremlins
4. Demons
5. Angels
6. The Mothman
7. The Ogopogo Monster
8. The Firebird
9. El Chupacabra
10. Ghosts
11. Pixies
12. Banshees
13. Leprechans
14. Vampires
15. Werewolves
If I think of something else, I'll let you know...
![]()
1. The Tooth Fairy --DOES NOT EXIST
2. Santa Claus--DOES NOT EXIST
3. Gremlins--DO NOT EXIST
4. Demons--DO EXIST. CASES ARE DOCUMENTED.
5. Angels--DO EXIST
6. The Mothman--DID EXIST, PROBABLY AN EXTRATERRESTRIAL BEING.
7. The Ogopogo Monster--PROBABLY REAL, MORE EVIDENCE NEEDED. POSSIBLY MISIDENTIFIED ANIMAL.
8. The Firebird--NEVER HEARD OF IT
9. El Chupacabra--POSSIBLY REAL, MORE EVIDENCE NEEDED
10. Ghosts--WELL DOCUMENTED. VERY REAL.
11. Pixies--DO NOT EXIST
12. Banshees--IF THEY ARE GHOSTS, PROBABLY REAL.
13. Leprechans--DO NOT EXIST
14. Vampires--DO NOT EXIST
15. Werewolves--DO NOT EXIST
EDIT TO ADD:
16. UFO Occupants--DO EXIST. TOO MANY DOCUMENTED CASES FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD.
Do not force me to say "Ni!" to you . . . Or you shall be required to cut down the mightiest tree in the forest WIIIIiiiiith . . . a HERRING!
I cannot resist a quiz like this. My own answers below:Yes, but Zach -- do you believe in the following?:
1. The Tooth Fairy
2. Santa Claus
3. Gremlins
4. Demons
5. Angels
6. The Mothman
7. The Ogopogo Monster
8. The Firebird
9. El Chupacabra
10. Ghosts
11. Pixies
12. Banshees
13. Leprechans
14. Vampires
15. Werewolves
If I think of something else, I'll let you know...
![]()
1. The Tooth Fairy --DOES NOT EXIST
2. Santa Claus--DOES NOT EXIST
3. Gremlins--DO NOT EXIST
4. Demons--DO EXIST. CASES ARE DOCUMENTED.
5. Angels--DO EXIST
6. The Mothman--DID EXIST, PROBABLY AN EXTRATERRESTRIAL BEING.
7. The Ogopogo Monster--PROBABLY REAL, MORE EVIDENCE NEEDED. POSSIBLY MISIDENTIFIED ANIMAL.
8. The Firebird--NEVER HEARD OF IT
9. El Chupacabra--POSSIBLY REAL, MORE EVIDENCE NEEDED
10. Ghosts--WELL DOCUMENTED. VERY REAL.
11. Pixies--DO NOT EXIST
12. Banshees--IF THEY ARE GHOSTS, PROBABLY REAL.
13. Leprechans--DO NOT EXIST
14. Vampires--DO NOT EXIST
15. Werewolves--DO NOT EXIST
EDIT TO ADD:
16. UFO Occupants--DO EXIST. TOO MANY DOCUMENTED CASES FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD.
Ok, now after reading that frightening list, please allow me to tell you something you may need to know: I'm 100% sure of STAR TREK IS NOT REAL.
You lie!I cannot resist a quiz like this. My own answers below:
1. The Tooth Fairy --DOES NOT EXIST
2. Santa Claus--DOES NOT EXIST
3. Gremlins--DO NOT EXIST
4. Demons--DO EXIST. CASES ARE DOCUMENTED.
5. Angels--DO EXIST
6. The Mothman--DID EXIST, PROBABLY AN EXTRATERRESTRIAL BEING.
7. The Ogopogo Monster--PROBABLY REAL, MORE EVIDENCE NEEDED. POSSIBLY MISIDENTIFIED ANIMAL.
8. The Firebird--NEVER HEARD OF IT
9. El Chupacabra--POSSIBLY REAL, MORE EVIDENCE NEEDED
10. Ghosts--WELL DOCUMENTED. VERY REAL.
11. Pixies--DO NOT EXIST
12. Banshees--IF THEY ARE GHOSTS, PROBABLY REAL.
13. Leprechans--DO NOT EXIST
14. Vampires--DO NOT EXIST
15. Werewolves--DO NOT EXIST
EDIT TO ADD:
16. UFO Occupants--DO EXIST. TOO MANY DOCUMENTED CASES FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD.
Ok, now after reading that frightening list, please allow me to tell you something you may need to know: I'm 100% sure of STAR TREK IS NOT REAL.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.