• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Forward Swept Wing K'Tinga Request

Starscape,

I really appreciate your work. From my looking at it, I'd have to say the shorter neck looks better.

I think you might have narrowed the centerbody too much in the back, though...


Helen
 
^^You're welcome. :)

I think you might have narrowed the centerbody too much in the back, though...

One thing that's been bugging me, and is kind of related to that, is I think the impulse/shuttlebay block on top of the centerbody looks too big.

I've narrowed that block a little in this next image, I think it helps the design:

 
Starscape,

^^Okay, how about this:

The impulse-shuttlebay block looks about the same size as the D-7's, though I'm not sure. I really didn't want to mess with that particular detail.

As with the centerbody: The size and curve at the front is fine, but honestly, I think the size of the rear section of the centerbody on Post #33 on Page 2 (which was one of the first).


CuttingEdge100
 
Sorry, I guess I should describe the changes I've made. :alienblush:

The impulse-shuttlebay block looks about the same size as the D-7's, though I'm not sure. I really didn't want to mess with that particular detail.

Yes, that block is now back to being the same proportions as on the K'Tinga.

As with the centerbody: The size and curve at the front is fine, but honestly, I think the size of the rear section of the centerbody on Post #33 on Page 2 (which was one of the first).
CuttingEdge100

The last image is actually the first time I've changed width at the rear of the centerbody (it's wider in that image). :)

For the image in post #33 the detail and impulse-block on the centerbody was compressed during the inital manip' so the rear width may appear to be wider when in fact it isn't.
 
Starscape,

Yes, that block is now back to being the same proportions as on the K'Tinga.

That's good

The last image is actually the first time I've changed width at the rear of the centerbody (it's wider in that image). :)

For the image in post #33 the detail and impulse-block on the centerbody was compressed during the inital manip' so the rear width may appear to be wider when in fact it isn't.

I see your point. Still, can you widen the aft centerbody a little bit more? Ideally, if possible, I'd like the spacing between the impulse-block and the edge of the aft-centerbody to be about the same as the image in Post #33

Also, I think you were right about using the larger wingspan that you had used in Post #33. It actually makes more sense.

By the way despite the various revision requests, I think you have done a fantastic job so far and appreciate your work a great deal.


CuttingEdge100
 
:)

The next iteration:



-> Wingspan is the same as a K'Tinga.
-> The centerbody is wider.


Looks very good from the top now on to the elevation, Bow and Stern views Keep up the great work :techman:

Thanks. I'm not sure how easy it'll be to manip' the other views, I might give it a try once the top view is finalised, though. ;)
 
Starscape,

You have the aft centerbody width perfect! (Out of curiousity, did you adjust the width of the forward centerbody over what it was in Post #45?)

The curvature of the forward centerbody is a bit much. It looks too close to the sweep of the wing.

I drew an example of what I was going for

ktingafsw100.jpg

(BTW, it's actually your image, inverted, I played with the colors to get purple, printed it out, drew on it then re-scanned it in so it's probably going to be quite big)

I drew a line to illustrate the curvature of the forward centerbody I want (If possible cut the neck off, revise the wing, then move the neck back on to avoid "cutting" off pieces of the neck that join the centerbody) Everything else is fantastic.


CuttingEdge100
 
Starscape,

You have the aft centerbody width perfect! (Out of curiousity, did you adjust the width of the forward centerbody over what it was in Post #45?)

The curvature of the forward centerbody is a bit much. It looks too close to the sweep of the wing.

I drew an example of what I was going for

ktingafsw100.jpg

(BTW, it's actually your image, inverted, I played with the colors to get purple, printed it out, drew on it then re-scanned it in so it's probably going to be quite big)

I drew a line to illustrate the curvature of the forward centerbody I want (If possible cut the neck off, revise the wing, then move the neck back on to avoid "cutting" off pieces of the neck that join the centerbody) Everything else is fantastic.


CuttingEdge100

Coolies :) :techman:
 
Starscape,

You have the aft centerbody width perfect! (Out of curiousity, did you adjust the width of the forward centerbody over what it was in Post #45?)

Yeah, I just moved the wings out, so the forward part of the centerbody became wider too. I thought that was better than lessening the angle at which the wings join onto the centerbody.

The curvature of the forward centerbody is a bit much. It looks too close to the sweep of the wing.

Okay, and thanks for the sketch it helps a lot. :techman:

Here's that correction:

 
Starscape,

Can you can give me a length estimate of this vessel compared to the standard K'Tinga?

The regular D-7 was 228.3 meters, and the K'Tinga was 232.64 (similar hull, longer nacelles -- many sources list it as being smaller, but I did some study regarding the scaling and concluded it to be 232.64) meters.


CuttingEdge100
 
Starscape,

Excellent work. At this point, I can't think of any revisions to make.

Thanks! :)

Starscape,

Can you can give me a length estimate of this vessel compared to the standard K'Tinga?

The regular D-7 was 228.3 meters, and the K'Tinga was 232.64 (similar hull, longer nacelles -- many sources list it as being smaller, but I did some study regarding the scaling and concluded it to be 232.64) meters.

CuttingEdge100

No problem. Using your figure for the K'Tinga gives this ship a length of 178.88 m.
 
^^ Sounds about right. :lol:

Have you thought of a class-name or designation for it? I'm pretty useless at such things. :sigh:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top