Didn't he start a thread a while ago about how he needed to change because people on this board viewed him in a negative light? What happened to that?
So did i! That and I found it more entertaining. I guess because it has the originality factor to it.I'm sure it is. Worse, I read the parody thread before I ever saw the original!
Locutus, even if you didn't mean the line about his job as an attack, he's not the only one to perceive it that way. Even I rolled my eyes and said "Uh-oh" with that one.
Didn't he start a thread a while ago about how he needed to change because people on this board viewed him in a negative light? What happened to that?
Didn't he start a thread a while ago about how he needed to change because people on this board viewed him in a negative light? What happened to that?
He probably realised that it's not worth giving a crap what people on the Internet think about you and give Locutus another chance to show what a wonderful, calm, well intentioned person he is.![]()
Thanks. Coming from you, that means a lot. And timely too, coming right after the apology and all to help diffuse the situation.![]()
Thanks. Coming from you, that means a lot. And timely too, coming right after the apology and all to help diffuse the situation.![]()
Is your apology going to stop you posting things like this again ? An apology is meaningless if you don't use it as an opportunity to correct your behaviour.
I gotta say though, he was pretty much dead on.
Maybe, maybe not. It's just funny that he spends so much time lecturing people on how to behave and then behaves in the same way. A little bit of practice what you preach wouldn't go amiss.
He's also a moderator, so it's kind of his job to give people feedback on how they post.
And as long as people are throwing stones, you're not so squeaky clean in the judgmental department either, Mr. Feminists-in-media-are-out-to-get-us-men. Locutus doesn't write like this that often, and when he does, he's 1.) articulate, and 2.) correct. That put his posts above 95% of what passes for critical thinking on this board. We could use more like it.
"Inherent hypocrisy?" It would be that if LoB started rant threads year in and year out, but he doesn't. He was using Trekker's other post as a starting point for a parody to make a point about the way Trekker presents himself here. Slightly different from being a ranting ranty rantlover himself.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.