Yes, thank you.We're talking directly killed by the war, as in killed in battle with the Jem'Hadar. Ziyal was killed by Damar, Gowron was killed by Worf, Kor basically committed suicide and Eddington met his end becuase he was a terrorist.
Yes, thank you.We're talking directly killed by the war, as in killed in battle with the Jem'Hadar. Ziyal was killed by Damar, Gowron was killed by Worf, Kor basically committed suicide and Eddington met his end becuase he was a terrorist.
Eddington died prior to the war due to his role as a terrorist,
Kor basically committed suicide (though it was in a war battle),
Ziyal was killed by Damar.
And anyways, Dax was only killed off due to Terry Farrell having some contract dispute not because it aided the story. If not for that then NO ONE in the primary cast would have died. And yet we have Niners calling for the mass execution of VOY's entire cast. Again with the double standard.
Yes, thank you.We're talking directly killed by the war, as in killed in battle with the Jem'Hadar. Ziyal was killed by Damar, Gowron was killed by Worf, Kor basically committed suicide and Eddington met his end becuase he was a terrorist.
You keep saying that, but would you care to give a reason that makes you think that?Double standard dude, double standard. It's okay for Sisko to take out a Borg cube with a runabout, but if VOY every destroyed a Jem'Hadar bug fighter there'd be hell to pay from the Niners.
Nobody gets paid for auditions.
Memory Alpha:Producers don't get paid extra for auditioning actors because that's expected of them and already factored into their salary.
She sounds good, I bet using her as a casting director is expensive. I bet the writers on Voyager wished they hadn't paid for her services so often.In addition to her work with the Star Trek, Lowry-Johnson has been the casting director for many other well-known television shows including NYPD Blue, Murder One, Six Feet Under, Tremors, Deadwood, Ugly Betty, and Desperate Housewives. She has also worked on a number of feature films, including La Bamba, The Hand That Rocks the Cradle, and America's Sweethearts. She and Ron Surma have cast a number of non-Trek movies together, including Liar Liar, Grosse Point Blank, and Bruce Almighty.
A member of the Casting Society of America, Lowry-Johnson has received six Emmy Awards for Outstanding Casting – two for NYPD Blue, two for Six Feet Under, one for Desperate Housewives, and one for Ugly Betty – as well as eight additional nominations for NYPD Blue, Deadwood, Big Love, Desperate Housewives, and the TV movies Gia and Mrs. Harris. Her Emmy awards and nominations for Six Feet Under, Deadwood, Big Love, Ugly Betty, Gia, and Mrs. Harris have been shared with Libbyann Goldstein, who worked with her on all of these productions. Lowry-Johnson has also received a total of 31 Artios nominations from the Casting Society of America, winning nine of them.
Nah, I'd be surprised if someone like Garrett Wang was being paid much more than the guest actors. It's not like as if the casts on Star Trek are Hollywood A-listers.Also I think people over estimate how much Trek actors get paid, which isn't as much as you'd think. It's very, very rare to get paid "Friends" or "CSI" salary.
This is the third thread where I have asked you to provide any evidence that DS9 was losing money and this is the third time that you have failed to do so. And this is the third time where I have pointed out that Voyager was getting fewer viewers than DS9 and this is the third time that you have dismissed that as being unimportant.It was syndicated, and they had VOY to make up for the money lost on DS9 (and they had their bases covered, in that after the show was done they could easily sell it into syndication thus increasing money made even if the show didn't make tons of cash).
It didn't break even, it was consistently beating Voyager.VOY was a network show, on a network not everyone got. DS9 was syndicated and thus should have been making more. That it broke even with VOY showed it wasn't.
Then why weren't characters like Chakotay and Kim utilised more? After all, they were contractually obliged to show up week after week, so why didn't the Voyager writers decide to focus more time on them rather than hiring guest actors if guest actors are considered to be so hideously expensive?And they stopped showing up or were killed off. If they made more money they likely would have kept coming back.
No, it's not. How many times must this be repeated?Double standard dude, double standard. It's okay for Sisko to take out a Borg cube with a runabout...
The slightest bit higher is enough of a difference.
This was your original comment in which you pointed out "the characters":Nobody gets paid for auditions.![]()
Memory Alpha:Producers don't get paid extra for auditioning actors because that's expected of them and already factored into their salary.
She sounds good, I bet using her as a casting director is expensive. I bet the writers on Voyager wished they hadn't paid for her services so often.
Nah, I'd be surprised if someone like Garrett Wang was being paid much more than the guest actors. It's not like as if the casts on Star Trek are Hollywood A-listers.
This is the third thread where I have asked you to provide any evidence that DS9 was losing money and this is the third time that you have failed to do so. And this is the third time where I have pointed out that Voyager was getting fewer viewers than DS9 and this is the third time that you have dismissed that as being unimportant.
Don't you see where the real double standard is in this thread?
It didn't break even, it was consistently beating Voyager.
Then why weren't characters like Chakotay and Kim utilised more? After all, they were contractually obliged to show up week after week, so why didn't the Voyager writers decide to focus more time on them rather than hiring guest actors if guest actors are considered to be so hideously expensive?
No, it's not. How many times must this be repeated?Double standard dude, double standard. It's okay for Sisko to take out a Borg cube with a runabout...
The slightest bit higher is enough of a difference.![]()
Double standard dude, double standard. It's okay for Sisko to take out a Borg cube with a runabout, but if VOY every destroyed a Jem'Hadar bug fighter there'd be hell to pay from the Niners.
This was your original comment in which you pointed out "the characters":
"Yes, but they had guest characters showing up episode after episode, and you have to pay for the costs of auditioning them week after week. With recurring roles you just have to pay them for every day they show up, you don't have to go through the process of auditioning them."
Based upon your statement is what my reply is based on. No where did you mention production or casting agents, just the actors playing the characters and their salary.
It's a neat twist because this time you're criticising me for not saying something which I actually said, rather than for saying something I actually didn't.The Godfrey Steven Benn said:...and you have to pay for the costs of auditioning them week after week.
And I'm sure they could have had a better deal each season if they weren't going to be calling upon the services of the casting director as much. If I was the EP of a TV show and I went from needing 50 new actors a season to 25, I would renegotiate my casting director's salary because they're not going to be doing as much work.Casting is already factored into the shows original budget because they're held on retainer, like the contractors for lighting, set design, catering, etc.
That's not proof, it doesn't even make sense.I already gave the proof: That DS9's ratings were SO far below what TNG's had been shows it was losing money. Voyager was on a small network not everyone got, and that DS9's rating weren't even THAT much better than VOY even though it was syndicated means that it was losing money.
Fire them, hire some recurring actors. Problem solved.Why weren't Chakotay and Kim used more? There's only so much than can be done with a plank of wood.
And yes, if Sisko did everything that Janeway did against the Borg no one would've complained.
Vorik came back due to Nepotism, he's Jeri Taylor's son.
I already gave the proof: That DS9's ratings were SO far below what TNG's had been shows it was losing money. Voyager was on a small network not everyone got, and that DS9's rating weren't even THAT much better than VOY even though it was syndicated means that it was losing money.
Why weren't Chakotay and Kim used more? There's only so much than can be done with a plank of wood.
And yes, if Sisko did everything that Janeway did against the Borg no one would've complained. If Janeway had been the half-Prophet Emissary commander of DS9 everyone would've criticized her every decision and "In the Pale Moonlight" would be regarded the same as "Threshold".
That's not proof, it doesn't even make sense.Watch this:
The Belgian civil war lasted from 1642 to 1978, and 42,000,000,000 people died during the fighting.
See, I made that up, it has no basis in fact and no evidence to support it. Yes, I said it, but that doesn't make it factual unless I provide evidence, and in this case I'm not going to provide evidence because I know I've just made it up.
Fire them, hire some recurring actors. Problem solved.After all, every little cut helps...
I wish you'd pay attention to what everybody else but you says.
I'm sorry you view an explaintation as critisism.This was your original comment in which you pointed out "the characters":
"Yes, but they had guest characters showing up episode after episode, and you have to pay for the costs of auditioning them week after week. With recurring roles you just have to pay them for every day they show up, you don't have to go through the process of auditioning them."
Based upon your statement is what my reply is based on. No where did you mention production or casting agents, just the actors playing the characters and their salary.It's a neat twist because this time you're criticising me for not saying something which I actually said, rather than for saying something I actually didn't.The Godfrey Steven Benn said:...and you have to pay for the costs of auditioning them week after week.![]()
Sorry to barge in into this fascinating discussion that I really don't have the patience of reading all the way through, but Anwar, I really must ask, do you have any arguments based on reality, or does your every "argument" of yours consist of a hypothetical situation you made up?![]()
To each their own. I loved almost every major character and actor on DS9 - with some it was love at first sight (Kira, Garak, Odo...) but even those I did not appreciate at first grew on me or developed wonderfully in later seasons (Jadzia, Bashir). I was attached to all those characters, main and recurring ones, whether I love them, hated them, or both at the same time. On Voyager, I am only mildly interested in watching the episodes, because the characters are mostly 'meh'. Neelix is annoying, I somewhat like Tuvok and the Doctor, but most of them are neither here nor there. And I don't love any of them.I really tried to like DS9. I watched quite a bit of it. Ultimately, I found the characters uninteresting or downright repellent. I will certainly concede that DS9 was more "consistent" than VOY, and had better plotted seasons overall. But that doesnt make it a better show, though in my experience Niners use those good qualities as irrefutable evidence that it does. VOY moves me and engrosses me to this day because I simply love the characters and the actors. And I will passionately make a case for the sheer brilliance of many, many of its episodes.
No other Trek show has ever come closer to capturing the spirit of my beloved TOS than VOY has, which is why they are the Trek shows I love most. Both of them have heart, somehow, in a way the other series simply dont, imo.
^^Give me a break, they had no intentions of killing off another cast member on DS9 if Ferrell didn't leave. So his point still stands that nobody from the main cast would have died during a war.
Kes was part of the primary cast and they didn't kill her off, she just evolved and left................alive!
Damar was envious of Ziyal from day one. He was looking for any excuse to get her out of the picture. Calling her a traitor was just the excuse he needed. Ziyal didn't die due to war, she was murdered due to Damar's jealousy.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.