Gorgeous, and I couldn't care less about the technical side of things.
Incidentally, the trailer reminded me of the Dinotopia books, and from there led to my discovery of
Journey to Chandara.
I dunno, it will probably look even better in 3D, but from what I've heard about the 15-20 minutes of film seen by preview audiences they weren't too thrilled with the dialogue. I've heard it's a bit wooden. And aside from the "avatars", the story certainly isn't original. Heck there was an animated movie that came out a year or two ago with a very similar premise as far as I can tell. It's a human invasion story told from the point of view of a human protagonist who has taken the side of the aliens being invaded. Yes I'm aware Cameron has been floating this idea around since 1995, but if you want we can start with the story of Pocahontas or a hundred other similar sci-fi tales.
Battle For Terra. Stylistically different, but thematically very similar. I think the environmental contamination of Earth and pressure from a military-industrial complex is even the main motivator for conquest in both movies, but I'm not positive about Avatar.
Hell, I wrote a short story in high-school with a very similar plot. The noble soldier rebelling to help the helpless fight a futile war against his own people wasn't even a new story when Dances With Wolves came out.
Someone should tell Hollywood that originality is a prerequisite for entertainment, they'll close up shop overnight.
I guess my only point is this...
Cameron hasn't done shit in mainstream fiction
for years. He has been working on this movie
for years. He has literally been hyping this movie as the very first hyper-real CGI film, something so jaw-droppingly gorgeous to look at that you'll forget about every movie you've ever seen. "I want to show them something that they couldn't have imagined for themselves" is a direct quote I just heard out of his mouth on TV. With a movie like that, as long as the plot and dialogue is serviceable he just
might make back his absolutely astounding budget. Original plot or not, it would be fun to watch, and I'm a big subscriber to the notion that it's not necessarily the basic plot of a story that's most important, it's the execution. Then again, if he's had 15 years to work on the script I'd expect better than a case of Lucas-itis.
But people are starting to get worried because, while not ywt seen in 3D, it just looks.... a bit played out. Plasticky. Not much better than what we've seen before in other places. We've seen the trailer, people have seen the 16 minute preview, and it quite simply doesn't look as real as Cameron claimed it would. Add in the fact that it has a generic plot and some (thus far) average dialogue and it makes people nervous. We're a bit past the point where CGI "wows" alone can draw in a crowd, if word gets around that it's boring or that parts of it are "creepy" because of uncanny valley issues or "cartoony", it's done for. People are also worried about what I mentioned before: Lucas-itis, which is what happens when you get so wrapped up in the technical side of things you forget everything else that makes a good movie and run the risk of
over-using special effects.
Oh, and I absolutely hate Michelle Rodriguez, that doesn't help from a personal perspective. Her sour face ruins every scene she's in, whether it's real or computer generated.
