This wasn't a warning; it was simply a caution, and a reminder about policy in ENT regarding these two ships. Allow me to clarify.That episode is TWILIGHT, where, ironically, Earth is destoryed, and the survivors end up living on what is later in the origianl timeline, Khan's planet. I particularly like how T'Pol is revealed to be in love with Archer after years of caring for him.
I thought this would have been a better romance than the nonsense we got with T'Pol and that moron Trip. Plus, Archer and T'Pol getting together would have been ironic, considering both characters initial views of each other's races.
Please, RandyS, No "Archer/T'Pol is better/worse than Trip/T'Pol." Feel free to express your personal opinion, but kindly refrain from turning it into a competition. I'd rather not break out the combat gear, thank you.
What? I thought I WAS expressing my personal opinion. I wasn't turning it into anything.
Strange thing to recieve a warning for.
"Archer/T'Pol rocked because 'Twilight' showed how touching it could have been." Fine.
"Trip/T'Pol was nonsense because Trip was a moron." No problem.
"Archer/T'Pol would have been better than that Trip/T'Pol nonsense!" Not so good. You're comparing the two ships and saying that one is better than the other. Considering our past history here in ENT with the shipper wars, declaring that either pairing is better than the other can be interpreted as inflammatory, because both T/T and A/T'P have dedicated fans.
Also, a general FYI to everyone: when you make a declarative statement that gives your personal, subjective opinion the appearance of cold, hard fact, rather than using "I" language such as "In my opinion..." "I think..." "From what I saw..." there's a bigger chance of putting off those whose opinion differs from yours.