• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Gay Exorcism!?!?!

Defining morality is tricky at best. However, if we're going to break it down in simplest terms, it has to do with right and wrong.

I just don't see how doing something that makes you happy and doesn't hurt anyone can be considered wrong.
 
Defining morality is tricky at best. However, if we're going to break it down in simplest terms, it has to do with right and wrong.

I just don't see how doing something that makes you happy and doesn't hurt anyone can be considered wrong.
What if it's self destructive? & This brings up a good point. What is RIGHT & WRONG anyway? you certainly can't see it. You can't talk to it.:vulcan:
 
Defining morality is tricky at best. However, if we're going to break it down in simplest terms, it has to do with right and wrong.

I just don't see how doing something that makes you happy and doesn't hurt anyone can be considered wrong.
What if it's self destructive? & This brings up a good point. What is RIGHT & WRONG anyway? you certainly can't see it. You can't talk to it.:vulcan:
If it is self-destructive, then it is hurting someone, so my conditions still apply.
 
Defining morality is tricky at best. However, if we're going to break it down in simplest terms, it has to do with right and wrong.

I just don't see how doing something that makes you happy and doesn't hurt anyone can be considered wrong.
What if it's self destructive? & This brings up a good point. What is RIGHT & WRONG anyway? you certainly can't see it. You can't talk to it.:vulcan:

Moral relativism can make anything seem okay. .
 
Defining morality is tricky at best. However, if we're going to break it down in simplest terms, it has to do with right and wrong.

I just don't see how doing something that makes you happy and doesn't hurt anyone can be considered wrong.
What if it's self destructive? & This brings up a good point. What is RIGHT & WRONG anyway? you certainly can't see it. You can't talk to it.:vulcan:
If it is self-destructive, then it is hurting someone, so my conditions still apply.
So if you used meth and even thou it can hurt you, as long as you didn't get someone else hooked that's okay?
 
Defining morality is tricky at best. However, if we're going to break it down in simplest terms, it has to do with right and wrong.

I just don't see how doing something that makes you happy and doesn't hurt anyone can be considered wrong.
What if it's self destructive? & This brings up a good point. What is RIGHT & WRONG anyway? you certainly can't see it. You can't talk to it.:vulcan:

Moral relativism can make anything seem okay. .
EXACTLY! Hitler thought he was saving & preserving the human race by getting rid of the ''unwanteds''. He REALLY thought he was doing the right thing.
 
What if it's self destructive? & This brings up a good point. What is RIGHT & WRONG anyway? you certainly can't see it. You can't talk to it.:vulcan:
If it is self-destructive, then it is hurting someone, so my conditions still apply.
So if you used meth and even thou it can hurt you, as long as you didn't get someone else hooked that's okay?
Learn how to read. That is exactly the opposite of what I said.

If you do something that hurts only you and nobody else, then you are still hurting someone. You are hurting yourself. I would consider that wrong.
 
What if it's self destructive? & This brings up a good point. What is RIGHT & WRONG anyway? you certainly can't see it. You can't talk to it.:vulcan:

Moral relativism can make anything seem okay. .
EXACTLY! Hitler thought he was saving & preserving the human race by getting rid of the ''unwanteds''. He REALLY thought he was doing the right thing.


Did you just bring up Hitler and the holocaust in a discussion about Gay Marriage?

Seriously?

Are you fucking kidding me?
 
I hate this slippery slope thing that comes up whenever gay marriage is discussed.

Whereas I dislike that most supportive of same-sex marriage shy away from supporting polygamy, whether for pragmatic reasons or because they genuinely believe state recognition of relationships should be limited to those between two people. The former is a mild form of cowardice, the latter is bigotry no less objectionable than that of those opposed to same-sex marriage.
How would this polygamy work?

Would the groups of husbands/wives have to be completely self-contained, where each person is only entitled to marry someone else who's already within that group?

Or if spousal connections can zig-zag and you can add your 3rd wife's 2nd husband to your Christmas Card list?
 
If you guys want gay marriage, I want the right to marry my sister.

You hear a lot these days about fighting for gay rights, but what about incestuous rights? Who is going to stand up for their rights?

I say it is high time we fight for the rights of incestuous couples. I am going to lead that charge and get on the ground floor of this movement.
 
If you guys want gay marriage, I want the right to marry my sister.

You hear a lot these days about fighting for gay rights, but what about incestuous rights? Who is going to stand up for their rights?

I say it is high time we fight for the rights of incestuous couples. I am going to lead that charge and get on the ground floor of this movement.

Can't you already do that in the south?
 
If you guys want gay marriage, I want the right to marry my sister.

You hear a lot these days about fighting for gay rights, but what about incestuous rights? Who is going to stand up for their rights?

I say it is high time we fight for the rights of incestuous couples. I am going to lead that charge and get on the ground floor of this movement.

Can't you already do that in the south?


Hey hey now..watch it. I resent that remark!!!;) Just because I'm from the south, doesn't necessarily make me a backwoods redneck with a brother for a husband.:rolleyes:
 
If you guys want gay marriage, I want the right to marry my sister.

You hear a lot these days about fighting for gay rights, but what about incestuous rights? Who is going to stand up for their rights?

I say it is high time we fight for the rights of incestuous couples. I am going to lead that charge and get on the ground floor of this movement.

Can't you already do that in the south?


Hey hey now..watch it. I resent that remark!!!;) Just because I'm from the south, doesn't necessarily make me a backwoods redneck with a brother for a husband.:rolleyes:

I'm not judging you.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top