To be honest, if you go by the rims of the saucers (both have a half, 2 whole and another half deck), they seem to be comparable in size.One is a model viewNew member here. You can tell that the new Enterprise is a helluva lot bigger than the original by comparing the saucers. Look how small the welders are compared to figures in the first picture.
![]()
![]()
one is a computer view
I guess that makes sense if you need to fit some 90 shuttlecraft and a beer brewery inside.
Which is why I said they may not have a ''official'' length.We've seen a few different lengths given, but all of them indicate that the ship is huge. It's almost as if they can't decide on a number...![]()
I just now realized the producers may not have an ''official'' length.
Which is why I said they may not have a ''official'' length.
CUSRE YOU J.J. CURSE YOU!!!!!!!!I just now realized the producers may not have an ''official'' length.
Clearly J.J Abrams has no idea what he's doing.![]()
Oh! Sorry. Thanks for agreeing with me then.Which is why I said they may not have a ''official'' length.
I was agreeing with you.![]()
I'd say that's practically a guarantee since the certain "attention to detail" Trek has had in the past was intentionally avoided... and if you look at Ryan Church's past work, it doesn't require or feature the attention to detail, plausibility and intricacy that someone like Rick Sternbach produces.I just now realized the producers may not have an ''official'' length.
Anyway, i will go for the new enterprise to be about excelsior size, no bigger!
Because you are clearly biased!
Oh? how? cause i dont want star wars sizes?? lol. i just dont think there is the need for that much space. i dont like change :P
I noticed that the new Enterprise looked a lot bigger when I saw the movie. When they did the shot of the shuttle bay, I thought it looked too big to be on the original sized Enterprise. Then I checked online to find some length figures and was shocked to see that they increased the size to somewhere between 762m and 914m. That's a huge increase in size. Not only did they double or triple the length, but you have to realize what that means in terms of overall volume (not only is it longer, it is taller and wider). If it is 762m, then by overall volume, it is approximately 18 times larger than the original Enterprise. If it is 914m, then by overall volume, it is approximately 31 times larger than the original Enterprise.
Here is a comparison chart I made up. It is to scale.
![]()
Nobody is certain of the exact size and there is some debate on the subject. However, it seems very likely that the size of this new ship is somewhere between 762m and 914m. Here is a thread over on startrekmovie.com on the subject.
http://www.startrekmovie.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7156
I'm not sure how I feel about it. It just seemed like an odd thing to do. I guess being fans of Star Wars, they were trying to increase the "wow" factor by increasing the scale of the ship.
I'm sorta with you there, I think something along the lines like the E-D is big enough as is, but something bigger I think is just a ''TAD'' ridiculous don't you think?I live pics like these. If the Ent is that huge I'm allll for it!![]()
Could that mean something in Morse code?They go long, short, long, 4 shorts, long, short, long, and then centered beneath this sequence is 2 short windows.
I'm sorta with you there, I think something along the lines like the E-D is big enough as is, but something bigger I think is just a ''TAD'' ridiculous don't you think?I love pics like these. If the Ent is that huge I'm allll for it!![]()
![]()
Actually, those are both CGI models.One is a model viewNew member here. You can tell that the new Enterprise is a helluva lot bigger than the original by comparing the saucers. Look how small the welders are compared to figures in the first picture.
![]()
![]()
one is a computer view
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.