You maniacs! You blew it up!!!
You maniacs! You blew it up!!!![]()
Compared to what actually looks like, I'm starting to think that this actually isn't that bad! The saucer's a mess but other than that, it looks right.
I really feel as though I'm missing something in my Trekkie brain that should make me want to care about this. People talk about the proportions not being right, but I truly can't see it. I see that they proportions vary from design to designs, but I'm not seeing how one way for a make believe spaceship is more "correct" than the other.
You maniacs! You blew it up!!!![]()
There was a GUNDAMPRISE!? WHERE!???I can't stand either of them but at least Vektor's Monsterprise gets the joke that it is supposed to be.
BTW, this ship does the Gundamprise one better: it was built underground, probably at the bottom of of mine shaft. The gravity of a planetary body and the increased air pressure are necessary to balance to transverse rectifubulating isodidecametric inducer coils.
See and this is why you fail.Well, they finally did it; they killed my fucking Star Trek!
See and this is why you fail.Well, they finally did it; they killed my fucking Star Trek!
Star Trek isn't yours.
I completely disagree. I like the new ship - if it were to be named anything other than Enterprise no one would have a problem with it.
See and this is why you fail.Well, they finally did it; they killed my fucking Star Trek!
Star Trek isn't yours.
No no you see it's that kind of thinking that WE own trek in some way that it is OURS that get people in trouble. It's a form of entertainment we buy a license to watch. We rent it, but we don't own it, until such time as we are officially writing it.See and this is why you fail.Well, they finally did it; they killed my fucking Star Trek!
Star Trek isn't yours.
???
Yes it is...just like it's Mine and Yours and Anybody else's who likes/loves it....
WE all have a version of Trek in OUR heads that WE consider OURS.
It's just not the Version that JJ & Company have in Their heads.
And there is Absolutely Nothing Wrong with that.
WE ALL just have to remember to look for the parts of TREK in this movie that WE like/love to enjoy it.
For some of US there may not be enough of that kind of Trek in the movie to enjoy it, and that's OK too.
![]()
No no you see it's that kind of thinking that WE own trek in some way that it is OURS that get people in trouble. It's a form of entertainment we buy a license to watch. We rent it, but we don't own it, until such time as we are officially writing it.See and this is why you fail.
Star Trek isn't yours.
???
Yes it is...just like it's Mine and Yours and Anybody else's who likes/loves it....
WE all have a version of Trek in OUR heads that WE consider OURS.
It's just not the Version that JJ & Company have in Their heads.
And there is Absolutely Nothing Wrong with that.
WE ALL just have to remember to look for the parts of TREK in this movie that WE like/love to enjoy it.
For some of US there may not be enough of that kind of Trek in the movie to enjoy it, and that's OK too.
![]()
This is the same thinking that got Battlestar Galactica Star Richard Hatch in trouble for the novels he was writing and had published, he thought he owned BSG, that it was his. Even Shatner had to get permission from the PTB to write Trek novels.
We are allowed to view Trek's world, but we are not a part of it. We are observers, we are not the weavers of the tapestry. When fans get that through their head they will have a much healthier relationship with Star Trek.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.